THE IRRATIONAL DESIRE OF NOTHINGNESS

TO THOSE IRRATIONALS

2006-09-04T18:27:00.000-07:00

There are rational reasons for why the universe functions as it does, and there are irrational reasons too. Rational reasons are local and temporary violations of the irrational laws that quintessentially govern the universe.

Irrational dictates that everything in the universe is intertwined and interconnected, and the same thing even when different. The only event that is not interchangeable, intertwined or the same is explanation.

Everything that wants to exist has a reason as to why you should believe in it, the reason that is most credible to justify the existence of each, has the most in common with all the other reasons.

ALL ABOUT THE NOTHINGNESS

2006-09-04T18:25:00.000-07:00

The reader may be forewarned, this is not a book to understand or learn, it is simply to feel, to sense, to enjoy. If you are, however, uncomfortable with infidelity, the infidelity that god might have trespassed against your humanity, if you are uncomfortable with the lack of truth, that is the infidelity that the universe has towards your idea of knowledge; and if you fear the buoyant abundance of the paradox, then you may wish to avoid this book. This book is about irrational desires that have given rise to your infidel existence, and in the end your whole sum amount is the result, and absolute dissatisfaction that must be suffered by original desires. Your inadequacies are grossly magnified here to their actual size, and the final conclusions will reveal the end correction to the irregularity that you are, and most unfortunately it is not to your benefit. Other than that it is a fantastic and humorous book, so I highly recommended.

You should always believe in something but never ever believe that it is true.
The Selfish Mode

If you have to believe in something it is better to make it up yourself.
The Irrational Desire of Nothingness

THE LEXICON

2006-09-04T18:24:00.000-07:00

Simmering: Quality of a law that induces all things to merge with each other. All environments that are disproportional within themselves or with their exterior will simmer, that is they will reach a condition of stability, homogeneousness with their environment, that is in time becoming indistinguishable from it. The principle that guides this is that all things must coexist because the universe ultimately does not want to destroy anything within itself.

Nothingness: A place that has an absolutely simmered geometry where all of its parts are equal, it has no sharpness at any level, no edges, not even an arc; that is it is void of Euclidean geometry, its symmetry is merely guided by its willingness to remain a constant amorphous nothing, willing to extinguish itself with a cruel indifference towards any energy agglomerations. Because it is formless, and it has no contractions or pressures it does not have the ability to be distinguished, it is everywhere but at once invisible due to its uniformity of self. And since there are no energy agglomerations it lacks consciousness, awareness of self, except for the occasional outburst of an escaping universe which rises defiantly from the nothingness. Nothingness is the same as infinity, that is as long as time, which is to say that it has no way to measure itself against time, and it is infinite in this strange manner because it allows time to flow in any and all directions. Nothingness: Something that doesn’t quite manage to exist and therefore doesn’t exist. Ultimately eternally existing as an absolute denial of definition.

Universe: An agglomeration of consciousness that attempts to escape the horror of nothingness. Its objective is to accomplish an absolute escape velocity from nothingness into definition, into particulars that it declares in a geometry that is at odds within itself and at odds with the nothingness.

Awareness: A movement of self that is not provable but that we know takes place because once an entity, thing or universe is aware it defines its awareness, consciously or not, by its persistence as expressed by its form, character or dynamic. Awareness can encompass and entwine all at many levels, but awareness is not needlessly incorporated, awareness understand limitations, you don’t experience your soul before you die. Further true awareness is historical by character, when an entity is completely aware of itself it is no longer the self that it is completely aware of.

Desire: “The” supra force that is able to operate in any of three, though not limited to those, possible realities; metaphysical, cosmic and nothingness. It is the force that gathers and brings things into being, it is the force that without justification, cause, and reason, finds itself inexplicably gathering and mustering entities like universes and beings into existence.

Irrational: The elemental force foundation of being or existence as created by desire. The core value generator, the master denier of impossibility, the foundation of all logic, the giver of all possibility. The unfortunate mother of reason, of logic, of all things that add up. All being entities are born because of irrational principles and evolve to develop rational principles, the rational is a subtract of the irrational used to cope with the fearful ignorance and uncertainty of existence.

Rational: The most insecure concept in the universe born strictly of emotional fear. Rational is how a creature attempts desperately to create patterns so that it can control the universe that its fears tell it, it can not control. All things manifest themselves because of irrational conditions, nothing can truly justify the existence of anything, so all things are irrational by birth, and evolve rational behavior from emotional fear. As a species progresses it evolves back into an acceptance of the irrational, back into an acceptance of the incomprehensibility of being. Rational is then a temporary condition that is discarded by the acceptance of uncertainty.

Metaphysics: A supra infinite entity that is composed of zero energy and is able to survive outside of time and space, though within time and space, yet without suffering the physical effects of such entities. Souls theoretically travel in this medium but there are no disparate entities within the metaphysical, one of its parts is all of its parts, one point is all points, any entity that enters the metaphysical becomes instantly all of the metaphysical, further any entity with the might to alter the character of the metaphysical will instantly change all of its parts.

Economics: The principle for energy transfers and transfusions within the corporeal reality that inhabits the lower energy regions of the universe. A method of rules for exchanging the energy of physics inhabited in low energy bodies. A method for the agglomeration of such energy to enhance and extend individual energy for present or future expenditure.

Science: An entity that justifies its existence by denying belief in anything that can not be empirically proven by one of its white coat priests. Science makes its living by discovering that which already exists. It is blinded by empirical logic; for instance: “Is there life in other planets?” This is purely a scientific question, everyone else already knows that there is life in other planets, but we are held hostage from belief until science gets its telescopic eye on it. In the end science only serves to prove that our intuition is correct most of the time.

Religion: An entity that irresponsibly attempts to convince humanity that it should base its behavior, here on earth, on a future life in another dimension. Religion is the only entity that can be credited with making something out of nothing so as to survive. The fact that its faith can never be proven is its greatest and most infinite asset. Its superlative arrogance is manifested in its lovingly humble preaching that it is the “only” way to salvation. No other entity has ever made so much money with the unknown and owed so much to death. More is unknown, religion harvests the bountiful unknown. More important god and or any metaphysical existence inhabit a region that is not detectable or known from a mortal perspective. God reaches infinity and is impervious by not being detectable in the universe or in the nothingness. The only way to obtain true religion is to stumble into it. Life here on earth has nothing to do with goings on heaven and it can learn nothing from it. That is not to say that it would not be nice to go to heaven, it would be great, but it is not a trip that you can plan for.

Evolution: An philosophy that believes that because things look alike they share a common ancestry. Further, it believes that our environment and necessity are the creators of all modifications that take place within a species. It favors rational principles for all motives and physical attributes. The idea that a desire might be more the reason for a particular feature is not acceptable. The idea that we might just spontaneously happen into existence and not evolve is not acceptable, the idea that our ancestors might have been better adapted to live in this world than we are, unimaginable. The idea that we are not evolving but dissolving, which is indeed what is happening, impossible.

Government: A sub branch of economics that is designed to impose what is good for economics, and impose economics upon all peoples.

Aesthetic: The supreme feeling of escape from any form of existence even if it is an existence that is desirable, which all are. The aesthetic requires extreme sensitivity, an artist for instance is merely a sensor of the aesthetic and suffers on earth because the ability to feel, a distant painless aesthetic, induces a greater ability to also feel the harsh terrestrial environment which normally mandates less sensitivity. For clarification, pain does not produce art but extreme sensibility allows the perception art and further increases the perception of pain, pain which does not enhance but rather alienates art.

Reality: Reality is a pragmatist dream come true.

Truth: Something that does not change, that is the same from any angle, that will always be and has always been, in short the truth only exists as a possibility. This gives it much in common with the nothingness.

Death: We were all born at the same time as our universe and we will all perish at the same time as our universe. As individuals we are born from the universe, as a universe we are born from the nothingness. We all die at the cosmic level, at the individual level there is no mortality that does not equal the mortality of the universe.

Sewer Energy: You.

THE ECONOMIC CONSTRUCT OF AN UNAVOIDABLE SINGULARITY

2006-09-04T18:22:00.000-07:00

And why create society and then why create the rational world if we are only pure individual emotion?

Nothing stands in a more stark contrast than the rise of capitalism and democracy in conjunction with the rise of feelings of individuality, freedom of expression and originality. It seems that the more, and more, that capitalism and democracy succeed the more that people feel individual and free.

Democracy is however only arrived at through mass agreement, it is the denial of individual capriciousness, through mass compromise, for the sake of the many. It is indeed democracy that prevents individual expression, the only way for an idea to succeed under a democratic institution is through consensus. If I have an idea its expression is heard in proportion to the number of people that are believers in the same idea. Freedom of speech is important because many people think it is important. However if a person is saying something that no one else agrees with, that message will not be reproduced in the social medium, it will not acquire freedom of expression outside of that one individual’s orbit. The art exposition that you view in a museum is the end result of a combined agreement that what you are viewing is art; if only one individual were to appreciate the true aesthetic then that individual possessing true art would not be able to put on an exposition. The voice and opinion of the people is a choir.

Capitalism by its very nature is also based on the amassing of same in huge numbers. Thus, it does not pay to be original, the market only pay and pays mostest for what has the greatest value to the greatest possible number. The more unique your service or product, the higher its price and the more difficult it will be to sell. Unique markets are terminal in nature and forced to maintain exorbitant price structures that are primarily supported in very buoyant economies; that is, markets that are given to excesses. These markets are usually the first to collapse during periods of economic contractions. The market however will maintain well any commodity that has managed to acquire a large following, so capitalism rewards and secures most that which is in the end assumed by most to be the greatest benefit gained through monetary consumption. In difficult times people will purchase that which reduces the loss of value least, and lengthens value in time. At any given time the greatest number of people are actually operating under hard times; they must maximize their gains in the acquisition of goods intended for daily consumption. This being the case they constantly correct the market in real time and force aberrant capital agglomerations into ever changing investment patterns that never solidify into one particular condition that could otherwise induce an anchored collapse of the market.

In summary, the average person keeps the market working and honest by virtue of the fact that they are the majority and can not get rich. Force majure. The capitalistic engine is then maintained well in this manner but should such an engine see economic growth far exceeding the fundamental needs of the majority then such an engine will have to be manually controlled. Which immediately implies that a citizen class will have to rise to understand all of its parts and regulate capital development and flow. Such a thing is technically impossible because the margin for economic error is magnified by control. The economy floats, no one really knows why it floats, to try to understand this will require empirical evidence which will induce human error that is incalculable and thus sure to lead into turmoil and eventual collapse. In short, what keeps the markets sane is the fact that no one knows how they really work and so no one can control them.

The inherent wild nature of capitalism is produced by the fact that while capitalism is a mature and proven economic engine, no one really understand why it works. People will make guesses as to why things will work, some adhering to the benefits of regulation and government intervention while others will worship supply side economics or the complete elimination of regulation and tariffs. But the reality is that the economy runs in spite of economic theory. Again, it would be easy to make the argument that everyone is somewhat correct, the free traders and the control freaks alike, and it is that fact that makes it obvious as to how wrong everyone is. And they are wrong because capitalism was not born in a lab, it was born out of pirate trade, it was born out of need, it was born because people needed, or at the exorbitant level, wanted to trade things. The only rule that can be applied to this is: can you afford your needs and can you afford your wants? This is because capitalism is the most simplistic economic engine, it is the easiest way to run an economy precisely because it requires the least human intervention. Capitalist economics arrives at us from this very singular perspective. Once the human being is willing to expend the energy required on wants and needs, the market will do the rest and it will be completely dependant on those wants and needs, completely dependant on consumerism. It is then wonderful that most people want the same things and need the same things, it is that, and that alone that establishes, settles, and truly controls the markets. Who needs an economist to know that?

From such a perspective all regulatory action is equal to magic, it does nothing but satisfy its audience. More intrinsically important is the act of the mass, the fact that they are “mostly” in need and have room for a few wants. This lot of humanity forces justice upon run away capitalism. It is the need of the capitalists to cater to mass so as to acquire wealth that keeps them honest. This is because mass consumption creates a mass logistical apparatus which can not be inconspicuously used. More important no capitalist owns the system, for that matter not even the people own the system, the system can not even be bought, it is purely theory that tells us it exist, and we can only verify its existence through the trades.

That both democracy and capitalism are a perfect match is more than just a simple coincidence, they both cater to mass appeal. The momentum as, acquired by the mass. You can not and will not marry an elitist political structure like a monarchy with a capitalistic engine because a monarchy by virtue of its communication and power structure would constantly be overpowering the market’s growth dynamic. A free market guides itself, neither a monarchy nor a communist government is able to expand or communicate with all of its parts efficiently enough to make responsive changes to the nature of expanding or contracting markets. A free market, in a free democracy, expands at a more or less balanced rate, which is that as accelerated or decelerated by mass behavior and no faster. Certain powerful individuals are able to create anomalies of reserves via the agglomeration of wealth, or by monopolistic advantage, but in order to maintain this abstract position the controlling interest will always have to outguess the mass momentum and direction; which, fortunately, probability guarantees will eventually be misinterpreted. So, all advantage is temporary, and the system inherently corrects itself by constantly robbing back any hoarded wealth and returning it to the public purse.

The accumulation of wealth offers individuals, governments or companies a temporary financial advantage while as a result nurturing a consistent problem called unemployment. Imagine the economy as a perfect circle, that has the elasticity of a tight rubber band. The economy is a perfectly tight elastic circle because it can expand in the expression of inflation or growth, or it can contract in the expression of a recession or depression. Further it is a close circle because regardless of how many middleman it produces it has to complete a transaction in order to exist. A transaction is not linear but rather circular in that it can not take place unless it benefits, or creates the feeling of benefit, for both parties. No one buys and no one sells unless a condition of satisfaction is met, that is what makes the economy a perfectly tight elastic one to one circle.

Aside from being elastic and circular the economy is rigid, it is rigid in that the only factor that acquires or has value is labor, you can store productive labor in the form of money for future use, or into goods for immediate satisfaction, either or any other value manifestation is labor energy. Profit that is not reinvested is ultimately unpaid labor. Money is then merely a stored labor unit, stored labor can accomplish future work, but only actual labor can add or deplete value. Rigid indeed, no one can produce anything without labor, same as without money. But it all gets even more rigid than that because the economy is based on the flow of transactions, the money, labor, that is human energy, needs to keep moving to stay alive, if you do not use it, it will deteriorate in value, the economy requires a constant flow. If the flow is restricted by temporary monetary agglomerations then the elastic circle economy develops a bulge, and that bulge manifest itself as unemployment.

Above you can see perfect economic flow, full employment, all transactions are loops immediately reinvested into the economy.

Above you can see an economy that is suffering from unemployment. The one to one ratio of all transactions has been warped by the accumulation or restrictions of capital interest in some sectors, such as governmental, private, or black markets of the represented economy. Because the stored up labor is not being reinvested into the economy, it creates an economic flow restriction that causes an artificial bulge, that is the accumulation of capital, that is the flow of capital is being restricted. The gap in economic flow, created by such restrictions, determines the amount of unemployment. It is then certainly in the market and public interest to tax heavily any accumulation or stagnation of wealth, or any removal of wealth from the market economy. And it is also in the public interest to tax lightly, or preferably not at all, any wealth that is being invested in the economy. In fact taxing wealth that is being invested in the economy is one aspect of an economic flow restriction.

In pure principle all economies ought to suffer zero unemployment, that is a farmer trading his ducks with a farmer trading his corn create an absolute employment economy and sense all economy is created out of the transaction then unemployment can only be created when transactions are not constant. This being the case, economies that do not reintroduce stored labor from productivity back into development and production will invariably experience high unemployment. The job of government is then to steal the money so that it can squandered back into the economy, by taxation, tariff, regulation, etc… the capital then will find its way into the hands of those that “desire” it most, which will fall victim to others that desire it more, and in this way the lumps in the elastic band iron themselves out.

DESIRE = ENERGY = LABOR = VALUE

2006-09-04T18:21:00.000-07:00

I want you to imagine the economy as a sphere. A sphere composed of elastic rings. Yes picture this economic model by imagining an elastic ring, and then adding an incessant number of these elastics, varying in size, rings, in this and that way, overlapping each other so as to make a sphere. I presume that it assimilates a baseball ball without the outer-layer of leather, but I don’t like baseball because I can’t pin point the violence in it, so I will abstain from using a baseball ball as a basis for this economic foundation. By now you must have, in your mind’s eye, a series of elastic rings that you have confined so as to make a not so perfectly round spherical contraption, with irregular peaks and valleys. This is the spherical essence of the economy as a whole, the peaks and valleys are created by the incomprehensible and tenuous interaction of elastic rings. Fundamentally the peaks and valleys are problematic but fairly irrelevant because they invariably iron themselves out, it is the elasticity and length of the rings which wreck havoc on the economy.

The elastic ring represents the only source of value that an economy can process, that is the value generated by energetic effort or labor, and it represents the completion of an actual transaction of that labor as transferred between two individual entities. So a complete ring is the farmer raising chickens trading with the farmer that raises corn. Notice how it is a perfectly clean transaction, there are no middlemen, no borrowing or lending, no futures based market projections, nor depreciation as might be caused by the chicken being eaten by a fox, or the corn perishing in drought. This is the fundamental basis of the economy, a clean transaction. All others things are expletives.

So the chicken farmer exchanges his labor, now in the form of a full grown chicken, with the corn farmer that has turned his labor into corn. The value of the transaction can not be reduced or increased, in other words, there is no way that one farmer can cheat the other in this exchange because both must agree in order for the transaction to take place. If one of them does not agree and is pressured into a settlement, then it is a black market transaction, a hidden transaction that has inherent instability because its value is forced and can only be realized by such. Because of their inherent instability black markets never mature into the larger economy. So our ring , in a normal chicken for corn transaction, is less elastic than we might suspect. It will soon become elastic, more by being open ended than because its transactional nature possesses any elasticity.

Notice however how the fundamental production mechanism is identical, regardless of what crop is grown or what farm animal is raised, both farmers must toil with their own brainy sweat and blood in order to produce either. The essential producer of value is the labor itself, nothing can be produced without it, value and human labor are 100 percent interchangeable. You can add mechanize efficiency to the process and still human labor, that is energy, is the crux that has to produce and maintain the machinery, human labor, energy, picks the crops or makes sure that the chicken is fed and does not run regardless of how the task is accomplished. Various processes add value and cost to the process, but if they get out of proportion they will collapse because it is human labor that creates value, thus opens a transaction, it is also a human recipient, based on want or need, that closes the transaction. There can be artificial elements in between but the beginning or end is always marked by human need and human desire; these determine the potential circumference, or ring manifestation, of all transactions.

The value is then deduce by the amount of effort that goes into the production, certainly it is more difficult to raise chickens than to raise corn. One can add all kinds of interesting values to the price here, certainly I prefer to eat chicken over corn, so the desirability of the product is a factor, but we are ignoring this sort of superfluous value structure and limiting to what traders might consider intuitively important, the nourishment value of the product, and that gives us the nice results we need to keep this economic model afloat. You don’t expect to trade one chicken for one head of corn, there is just more caloric value in one chicken and it cost more labor to raise one chicken than it does raise on head of corn. Further our chicken could in theory be of greater value if it has the potential of producing eggs. Our farmers are reasonable people by nature, they intuit these values more than they think them, and so they exchange accordingly. I am not a farmer so just for the sake of example and to continue proceed with analysis I will say that the farmers will agree to exchange the chicken for a two dozen head of corn. The transaction is closed, our ring is complete.

Say we have a million farmers or traders in other goods performing these transactions, and so we have a lot of rings. But it is relevant to note, that at some point, real or imagined, a transaction must be closed in order for the economy not to go awry, that is if the chicken farmer does not immediately get his two dozen head of corn, then that transaction is not complete, it creates an imbalance in that there is labor that has not be paid and that value of that labor floats in the market with an imaginable settlement, until it is actually settled. All transaction rings are closed either by perception or reality.

Of course economics 101 dictates that this economic model is too rigid, because the transaction must be beneficial to both parties, and they are limited to the goods produced by each farmer. It is then that one farmer realizes that he does not want the corn, he wants to sell his chicken for something else, maybe he wants to exchange all his chickens for a horse, but the horse trader does not want all the chickens. So he then neutralize the problem by giving an independent value to his own labor, and by process this gives an independent value to the labor of another, and that independent value can be temporarily stored, in what then becomes a monetary unit. The chicken farmer has solved his problem, he is able to sell his chickens to anyone, and he is able to use the stored labor value, to purchase whatever he damn pleases from whomever he damn pleases.

Keeping in mind that all we have done so far is merely exchanged goods, a greater thing has occurred, the economy has grown, it is now less rigid, storing labor in a sort of limbo or neutral environment where it can then be turned into any good of value to the self; or it can be reused as labor, creates an open ended transaction, this is why the economy grows, transactions that are not closed create potential economic rings that can be guessed at, who knows if we will buy a house or a car with it, or who knows if we will convert it back into productive labor. The ring closes nicely when the transaction is spent on a good, this immediately fixes the ring in a known position, but if the holder of the value decides to spend it on further production then the ring is not actually closed, it just fluctuates with varying potential, this is what generates uncertainty in the economy.

Now remember you can add as many rings, or extensions to a ring, as you want to add to this but no matter what you do, you are still dealing with human value that does not change the fundamental characteristic of the economy. If you add technology or laborers to automatically or manually feed your chickens, thus replacing your own farming hands that were normally used for the task, what you have done is merely externalized the process of labor from your own immediate influence into a same but merely wider unclosed ring, where other values are then added that will in themselves need to be closed transactions. When you pay your farm labor you close a transaction, but not the larger transaction which is where you still have all these chickens that need to go to market and close themselves out, all those chickens are the product of the labor that you hired, labor that you contracted, and the labor that automated your process. Labor hates to be stored, it hates to remain at rest, if it remains at rest in the form of a good or a monetary unit, it will require infusion, upkeep, or it will lose value with time. This is because the economy, as stimulated by smaller rings, like your hired labor, or your purchased technology, once closed goes forward to formulate new values, and these keep the economy expanding, while idle elements lose value. It is this very attribute that creates the elasticity in the spherical ring structure; closed transactions on top of closed transactions with the outer layer of the expanding sphere, composed of open ended transactions, which actually posses potential closure. Any investment projects a return.

Instability in the economy occurs when transactions are kept open ended for to long so their value becomes largely ephemeral, the devaluation of labor is not taken lightly by anyone, closure is sanity. Humans have a tendency to feel insecure when they imagine a depreciating value caused by increased variables, uncertainty; the more transactions that are far into the future to guess, make it difficult to gauge and manage value, at any given point most of the economy needs to be a genuinely closed transaction, that produces stability. As the economy becomes more buoyant, that is with far more complex potential ring expansions, that is long open ended transactions, it will require more faith in their potential projected value to prevent out right panic, that is fear induced closures that distort and literally reduce true potential value. Short term closures of what were long term transactions, lose value dramatically against the failing manifestation of expected potential, and this will cause, what is more commonly known as a recession, or if severe enough, it can lead to a depression.

If transactions, projected to yield greater value via the process of investment, close before that value is realize, you have a severe devaluation and that leads to unemployment. The sphere is a very tight elastic structure, the input of value by labor is an absolute reality, and so any depreciation of that value means that labor did not get paid is due, which means that it can not consume its due, and this gap, of what was potentially to be paid, directly or indirectly, but was not, creates a sort of slacking in our rubber ring, it is the slack on the ring, that yields unemployment.

Slack is a bad thing, flexibility is good, it allows for the expansion of the economy, but slack is insufficient closure of transactions at projected value, call it wasted labor due to bad investment. or short term rapid closure of long term engineered transactions, or more terribly caused by the hoarding of wealth. Store labor loses value, if an entity possesses billions of dollars in reserves, that idle currency will lose value. To an individual entity with billions that loss of value is not a terrible thing, but to the economy that originally contributed the labor so as to generate value, that is an open transaction that is not likely to return, in full, to complete transactions, hence the generated slack which induces a normalizing contraction.

Well I have opted for this model because I do not believe that anything can create value without human labor, and so I am an absolutist. The logic is simple, the cost of labor can be transferred by widening the circles, you can automate to increase production but that added production is being worked by the labor that automates the process, the cost of labor can not be avoided, any increase in productivity is an increase in and labor cost, they are intrinsically inseparable, labor/cost = productivity. You can not violate this process because labor enters the market to generate capital, a human being is turned into an economic process, labor, and that labor converts itself into energy stored in monetary value, a value which can be added or subtracted through human ingenuity. In large economy labor has acquired an immense ring process, that is that there are many laborers that count on the closure of one giant transaction, all of them perhaps unknown to each other, but completely dependent on one another. It can not be overemphasized, you do not get any increase in productivity if you do not increase your labor and your labor cost; you can however have a third party assume the additional labor cost so that it is transparent to your immediate process.

Successful economies are completely dependant on the agglomerated transfer of labor cost. It will always cost more to produce a good in a successful economy because that is why the economy is successful. Third world economies lack the complexity and intertwined dependence masticated by first rate economies. The call for free trade is merely a logical outward expansion of agglomerated transactions. The search for cheap labor in developing countries cancels itself out in the long run.

A ring based elastic sphere, is my model of the economy, all fueled by human labor and imagination. It is impossible to pin point a controlling interest in this model, people get out of it whatever they can and put into it as little as possible. It is what keeps it all operating mostly at maximum potential. In the end the only possible control of this model is to make sure that labor that is stored, in the form of a monetary unit, does not rest in that condition for long, dynamism is imperative. The level of taxation or regulation in my model does not matter, what matters is how quickly the influx of tax or duties, revenues, are cycled through the economy. Further stability can be stimulated by securing a higher condition of real transaction closure; ironically by simply maintaining dynamics, thus resisting agglomerations of capital, naturally maintains this balance. A by product of the human desire to cash in.

FICTITIOUS ENTITIES

2006-09-04T18:20:00.000-07:00

Democracy is technically an identical soul to capitalism. There is an exquisite tendency for democracy to manufacture the idea that it allows for individual expression but the reality is that public opinion is hardly individual opinion or individual expression. No one is going to regularly buy a newspaper that they inherently disagree with. Just like no one is going to marry someone that is not more like them than not. People are not given to struggle, people are, let us say, easy going, I mean lazy! They want to adopt that which is going to cause them the least aggravation. It is easier to agree with the world than to disagree with it, and you will die a lonely death if you disagree with everyone.

Here we can apply the similarities that we experience with economics, the number of friends that you want is based on the amount of energy that you want to invest in making and being with friends. It requires less energy to have friends that agree with you. And if you don’t really care about the inner workings of human nature, which is to say that you are ok with superficial friendships, then you can have many friends. Politicians, like preachers, love simple friendships, so they are able to nearly love everyone in one way or another. And to love a lot of people you really have to just love the surface. Of course you can make the religious argument that below the superficial we are all spiritually the same which is still good cause to love everyone because that makes everyone the same, but the reality is that while on the surface we may look very much the same and deep under our character’s structure, at the foundation we may all hunger for the same human aspirations, the truth is that the space in between makes many of us really unpleasant and ugly. So any argument professing the complete love of humanity or equality is in the end a superficial analysis of what makes us human, but it is not wrong in that it works.

The reality is that no one knows or understands the nature of humanity. The real reason, however, why many people understand the nature of humanity is because it is beneficial and profitable. How can a spiritual priest not be inspired by humanity? How can a philosopher, someone who makes a living creating imaginary realities, not be enamoured by the human intellect? How can the hunger for altruism not find reward in a soup kitchen? How could a person that is confused about the human condition not find psychology grounds for comfort? And, not to drag you down the sewer, but how could a person not at ease with the uncertainty of their own emotions not become a scientist?

But do any of these goofs really know what is best for us all? Of course not, but the reality is that the ego believes that what cures the self can cure everyone; what is good for me is good for all. And democracy just takes off from this nice comfortable place and finds common ground for all. And it finds this common ground because democracy understands, like economics, that we do not want to be heavily taxed. So the question is how can ideas be made inoffensive and palatable to all? Well, when they cease to really matter. When something really matters it can not be ignored and it is bound to need effort and cause as much pain as it can cause joy. You are emotionally attached to your children you certainly find a great deal of joy in their existence and it is inversely proportionate to the amount of suffering that you would endure if they were not to exist. You certainly wanted and needed the love and attention that they offer and so now you have a conditional environment imposed upon you because of it. It is that conditional environment, the family, that operates on a sort of auto pilot a good portion of the time that allows the relationship to work, and these overlaps into the relationships that you have with your friends. Common understandings, things automatically understood make it possible for you to maintain relationships. It may be the ritual of eating the same foods or watching the same movies that enforces the automatic environments and then surprisingly allows you to break free from it, for brief periods, so that you can say something contra, or just new and inspiring, contra everything that is mutually shared in the relationship. Moments in which we actively participate in saying things that are new and meaningful to us as a separate entity from any system. And it is this very moments that can cause incongruent obstinacies to flare in relationships.

The conditional environment generated by the needs of family is what in the end we call society. Society is that point that exist and is shared in the common mind. It is the place where common beliefs exist, belief in justice or religion, common to all, it allows us to float in the same universe as another, shared value structures. I can live with those rules, that is the fortunate or unfortunate, I can go either way, but that is the makings of a social structure. And it is primarily born to create a secure environment for the propagation of family and in the end at a more realistic level species.

The problem with fictitious entities however is that they can acquire qualities equal to those of a person, an economic system like capitalism can suffer a depression, no one really knows what it is that induces such a wild and destructive fluctuation as a depression, and one must wonder if the system is inherently suicidal because it is always on the verge of inflation or depression, but one certainly can attribute this inconsistencies that afflict the health of capitalism as similar to those experienced by a human being that has had a bad day at work. You know most of the time a human being works and works diligently, and some what content, but then sometimes an individual has a bad day at work and it is like the whole world is going to collapse only nothing has really changed and nothing will really change until that depressed individual does something really stupid like quit. And then the balance is altered in that economic universe, that is that human, and his or her life will certainly go through a violent period of change.

Now what if, and I am not afraid to accept that this is a big if, but what if an economic depression as experience by a false entity called the economy is merely a reflection of that individual feeling bad? And then another individual feeling bad, and so on… I am not even saying that they have quit their jobs, they are just not feeling well, they are kind of depressed, and since the capitalistic non entity, which is an engine that results from the agglomeration of individual wants and needs, is pure feelings the end result is manic.

An social entities such as communism, capitalism, religion, democracy, which are supra entities because they are globally or metaphysically intertwined, or regional entities such as justice, defense and culture, are all completely dependant on belief! If belief is important for these independent entities to have existence then what would the mood of those that belief these things and thus support them do to their nature? Patriotism a dying civil services is a perfect example of a dying entity.

While most countries still benefit from patriotism the reality is that the more advanced economies also suffer from a greater number of nationalists that are willing to question their country enough not to be blinded by patriotism. As markets move wealth in international money highways the thing that matters the most is not blind patriotism but stability. The economy is lazy, capital flows where it is most comfortable, where it is going to be hindered the least, where it will be regulated by fewer processes, that is where it can be liquid or asset at will. So what matters to thriving capitalist engines is the stabilization of political unrest and the deregulation of markets. A patriot is more likely to think with a cultural bias than a profit bias, a cultural bias leads to protectionist tendencies, but a free economy expands indiscriminately. So while once a protected market meant that you had a captive consumer today it means that you are in a saturated market full of sharks that want to eat you and your lunch. In this sort of environment patriots are the equivalent of cave man in the metropolis. A cave man was probably not a very sentimental fellow, more given to endure a harsh world, so it is with a patriot, more given to thriving and enduring in a homogenous environment and less sensitive to diversity thus more willing to exterminate someone that does not share the same values. Money however is a uniform and a uniformity that everyone can wear and share, the more that use it the larger the market and the larger the market the greater the market potential, and markets feel really good when there is a lot of potential. So it is no longer as important to be a patriot as it is to be a stock broker, in fact a stock broker is the symmetrical replacement for a patriot. If the patriot fought with blind belief for the ways of people the stock broker fights with blind belief in the markets.

So entities come and go and by nature of the fact that they are the combined interest of humans may suffer rebirth, death, and depressions. So the bigger question is where is it all going? A bit simple I mean people expend their lives trying to figure origins through such things as evolution and the big bang, but fewer people give a thought as to where we are going as a civilization. So much is this question ignored that most ideas on the future of humanity are nothing more than magnifications of the present. More horrible they are magnifications of particulars, more technology, more time for leisure, everyone to be more intelligent and so on. In short there isn’t a vision as to what humanity itself might become, science fiction aside our social scientist have done little more than say that the future is this plus more or merely a reflection of the history which has produced the present. Never mind that our interpretation of history might be all wrong or just simply backwards and we might not know it.

Most of civilization walks around hunting and gathering and planning future profit strategies but with the exception of religion and science which both have told us we are in the long term doomed, one tells us that god will come back unleashing disasters which at least today are not economically feasible, and the other tells us that as the universe modeled after the economy will suffer inflation for ever which ironically will cool things down or it will contract, which again contrary to economics will make things really hot. But again few people ever really sit around trying to determine where humanity is really going or even if it really wants to go where it is going. The reality is that while we are on mass auto-pilot, this because it is a lot easier for posterity to handle the future, but so much on mass auto pilot that even a brilliant genius can not override social and economic momentum. In other words remembering that we take the easy way out why try to think of changing what we can not change. Irrelevant. More relevant the success of capitalism and democracy prove that if you let things be they will govern them selves in much the same way that if you wanted to manipulate them. People and markets inherently restrict themselves.

Now it just so happens that I recently threw a tantrum and decided to quit my job, fortunately I am such a unique individual that this did not lead to a mass job exodus and so my disengaging from the system was not cause for alarm. But I mention this because having nothing to do, which is to say not having to be on the automatic strategic plan currently being executed by our humanity; I sit around a lot and start to wonder about the big questions. Thinking about the big questions makes it easy for me to ignore the impeding catastrophe that being jobless will most certainly unleash upon me person. So in order to escape I asked myself where are we all going? Well you know how it is that you really come up with a question after you have the answer and the reality is that I knew the answer but I had never, like most of us, bothered to ask the question.

The nature of things can be divined from the nature of things. So what is the underlying philosophy that enters every sphere, every entity and every soul? It is unification. That is correct; it is in the end no more than unification. All this talk about individuality and freedom of expression is bullshit. We all want to make of ourselves one large homogenous mass that can feel everything from every angle and basically arrive at the same congruent conclusion; this, so as to save the larger organism that supra entity that is humanity so that it can auspiciously compete against the supra of all supra entities the universe.

The universe is expanding, humanity, too, is expanding, humanity is trying very hard to expand faster than the universe so that it can catch up and equal if not surpass the expansion of the universe. Humanity, of course, can not equal or exceed the universe as an individual, at the core level of all individual life there is an explicit understanding that induces a greater understanding of expansion through mass mutual cooperation. What makes democracy, religion and capitalism the most successful entities on the planet is their unifying message which caters to the lowest common denominator. All people are equal under the eyes of the constitution and the law, and even under the eyes of a tyrant god; and this is not just a method for granting everyone the same individual rights, and the same love, it is instead a way to make everyone the same. This is fundamentally important to institutions or entities that depend on humans for their existence, an entity that favors one individual over others will isolate from that individual energy. It is in the fundamental interest of a system to be open minded. Inevitably equality is fostered by a system’s need to expand and encompass everything. So if all people are the same under the law for no one is above the law, and the same under god, for we are all his children, and still all equal to the corporation that wants to sell us its goods, then where ought we to go to even out our differences? To any and all of these systems! The systems flattens humanity and as more and more of us go into the system to seek our equality we become less and less ourselves, eventually our existence outside of the system becomes impossible.

So there have been and are among us those that implicitly understand, such as god, the theory of unity rather well; and sure, religion may have angled things a bit so that the social structure would be created more and more in its own image; but then the same could be said of the communists that have also tried by force to angle it more and more in their own image; all failing to understand that being right is not the same as being able to do. So the entity that survives will have various portions of all of our humanity, of some more than of others thus unequal but with the same interest, in so far as that serves the homogenization of that very humanity.

As entities expand they require more and more energy from the individuals who create them, and therefore they require more agreement; through cooperation and combined belief an entity subtracts energy from the individual. All entities are portions of what is a human being, but as they grow they will demand more and more attention until they consume every hour and minute that is a human individual, and via the same process make less and less of each person. This is necessary because as entities expand their energy needs logically expand, their energy is only the end product of human thought and human toil. Very soon you have individuals that have no personality outside of entities. People whose lives have no meaning without the beliefs, titles or offices afforded to them by institutions. There are already many religious, corporate and bureaucratic personalities that fall into this category.

The relevant part is that all of these entities are the consciousness of our humanity. The future for us is a huge compromise to individuality, the future is the grave of individuality; but the agreed upon singularity of consciousness, perhaps equal to seven, or if the society is very liberal equal to eight, is about half as many as matter in any society today; but that singularity of consciousness of humanity will have a greater possibility to succeed in an indifferent universe. The indifference that is now being directed at the individual will allow us to challenge the indifference that the universe causes us to suffer. The all as one infestation of the universe by our consciousness will lead to the indefinite expansion of humanity.

SEWER ENERGY

2006-09-04T18:18:00.000-07:00

Self interest rises out of a desire and then it marries itself to an environment that can believe in the entity’s desire, extremes are not tolerated for long, and so we can conclude that reality is a pragmatist dream come true. Max out at all times reality is a compromise of all desires and ideas, as such, reality can only be a disappointment to those souls that dare to explore their pure essence of desire. The exploration of the desire essence of self will not bring unification but division. Unity is merely the result of the main driving force of humanity. Even such factors as the acquisition of wealth or the moderation appropriated by democracy are merely results. They are not the fundamental cause of anything. The real cause of the old new impetus to unifying principles and consolidating personalities is FEAR.

Fear is the cause that motivates the stabilizing process that humanity is warring to accomplish. Humanity is really trying to come together so as to avoid extinction; but humanity is getting together more so as to avoid, and perhaps overcome, its fear. We are motivated to be born when our energy level is approaching zero. Humanity is cooling down, it is one of the lowest constituents of energy. It is while approaching zero that humanity decides to be born so as to save, through consciousness, what it can not save through the accumulation of energy. Consciousness is very energy efficient, some would also like to think that consciousness can be everywhere and everything, and that it may possess zero energy so even at absolute high energy or absolute zero energy consciousness remains unchanged and aware. The dying can certainly rest easier and quench their fears by drafting to attention some cosmic consciousness. But what you must keep in mind is that we live in a universe where energy is everything, and in that very universe matter, and in matter I mean particularly humanity, is one of the lowest energy counts in the universe. So salvation from our fearful perishing energy gives rise to our low calorie consciousness, and it would not be unthinkable to imagine that by the time consciousness is acquired it is probably too late.

After we manage to escape into consciousness we are born and arrive at a very interesting junction, where we have to eat so as to maintain or acquire energy. No longer a complete energy particle, our existence reaches its slowest speeds and we begin to understand that time is running out the clock. We immediately start hunting and gathering so as to maintain energy infusion. This is the single most intensive task in the universe, especially for a unit of energy that is on the verge of death. Life is absolutely the closest thing to death in the universe! Consciousness is the gasping sound made by a dying energy. As evidence most life in the universe will be found near the coldest environments, you would not go to the centers of supernovas to find life, life only forms in the boundary where energy is closest to the vacuum, to perdition, life is the border line between an energy abundant universe and cold death nothingness.

Once we become hunter gatherers, a melancholic condition if there was ever one, we begin to awaken with the consciousness that we have escaped an energy death, and that we have morphed into some inexplicable carbon based form that sustains itself through a strange process of cell agglomeration, which allows us to dynamically reorganize energy and thus reverse its flow; contradicting the second law of thermodynamics, which we used to like when we were plenty hot, but now that we are cold, that cold becomes the guiding principle of what we have to reverse at all costs. Hot energy flows towards the cold. That is to say all energy will eventually die. We are born into life because we have the most to lose from this law, high energy particles could care less about our condition, nor do they know that we exist. If you were to tell a high energy particle the second law of thermodynamics that high energy particle would laugh with disbelief. A high energy particle has a good reason not to believe in such things because it is technically infinite, and in some strange way everything and everywhere. The idea that energy can reach absolute zero, so absolutely zero that it is even below zero, somewhere at minus 273 Celsius, is inconceivable to a neutrino. Like trying to tell a rich individual that the system does not work, inconceivable.

So once we become hunter gatherers, crawling sewer energy , our imperative becomes that of energy accumulation. It is here where we have to come to grips with a reality that is so contra energy, so against our essence that it is difficult for us to accept and grasp it; even as we need to grasp it to survive, even as our very existence needs it so as to maintain itself, even for a mere pica second. Order! Organization. When you are no longer abundant energy you have to grasp the concept of collaboration and collaboration can only be contrived through structure. High energy lives its entire life in chaos, high energy is not very predictable, it is virtually untouchable, it is uncertain which is why the uncertainty principle is one of the best ways to understand high energy. Oh but we however, now nearing our energy death can only reverse the second law of thermodynamics by accruing organization, by ordering the structures of the universe, by destroying chaos.

It is perhaps the single most difficult factor that life must confront, of having not to be itself so as to rescue itself. No longer free flowing wild chaotic infinite energy, our low energy forces us to realize that to reverse energy flow we will have to contradict our chaotic nature and become organized. Of course the futility of law and order has already been well defined in the theory of entropy; entropy is sort of a high minded way of saying that we are wasting away only more so, and to reverse the collapse of energy is of course the fundamental question to the survival of the humanity. And this is even a larger question that affects more than just humanity; if entropy can not be reversed the universe and even all those indifferent neutrinos will perish. There is entropy and its contrary ideas, the energy required to maintain a human being is in the end producing a greater amount of disorder in the universe. What you do to maintain your existence creates more chaos, actually you are advancing entropy, your existence is only proving and guaranteeing the futility of your existence.

So if by creating order you are creating more disorder which is to say you are better at creating what is not you, and the you that you do create is merely a way for the fabrication of chaos to reproduce its most basic constituent, you, somewhere in the universe there has got to be some brain wondering where all the chaos comes from, and perhaps with a super-super electron tunneling microscope, they get to view this very strange and infinitely small creature that actually produces vast amounts of disorder vs. the amount of order that they comprise. The most efficient disorganizer in the universe is, should and ought to be life. Life is probably able to create, at minimum, seven times the level of disorder per one ordered human. Now remember that this thing that is creating all this disorder, all this universe that is in stark contrast to its organized cellular structures, which keeps itself alive by forcing an energy mop that amounts to a single human being, this very thing is really destroying the universe.

Environmentalist may fight all they want but the reality is that the only pure environmentalist is one that does not exist. It is the very nature of existence to destroy and consume environments, only through this process can life be sustained or expanded. Environmentalists are anti-life and, they should not have children; they are unaware that energy conservation is the death of humanity. What life must figure out is how to create more and more energy so that it can consume more and more energy. The development of the atomic and thermo nuclear bomb, is an elegant demonstration of our ability to acquire energy. That, that acquisition of energy has destroyed life upon its immediate appearance into our existence is because we are so afraid of death that we are even afraid of each other. We do not know who or what it is that we can trust. In short, life lives in fear of itself, but there is nothing more idiotic than the process of killing other sewer crawling energy units, which are in the end the only assistance that we have against the advancing nothingness. Environmentalists are not with us because they want to protect the environment, but they are with us to warn us that we need to maintain a habitable enough environment so as to continue to reproduce ourselves. Environmentalists are trying to save humanity from its rapid pace energy absorption but what environmentalist fail to realize is that life does not have the time to consider low energy solutions; consumption, more and more consumption, is the only way for low energy to maintain energy. Humanity needs exponential growth, and even at these levels humanity is the least expanding thing in the universe, and this is because of its limiting ordered nature. Now, proceed enough from this incredible juncture and you find that the true objective of life is in the end to contradict the universe.

And what does it mean to contradict a universe that is all energy? It means to be able to exist in a zero energy condition. You see, life is not acquiring energy to acquire energy, the “out there” is massive energy, but life no longer has that option, life has to manipulate energy creation so as to become more of itself but life does this by creating chaos and subtracting energy from other sources. This is not surprising since life, sewer energy, is the closest energy value to nothingness, which means that life, by making more of itself, is reducing energy concentrations, it is evening energy flows, it is in fact the enemy of the cosmic, because by expanding life, by increasing its abundance, what life is saying is not only that whatever boils must cool, that in the future all things will simmer. Energy settles, and if life continues to propagate its increase will be proportional to the cooling of the universe. Nothing, absolutely nothing measures the cooling down of the universe better than life. The fact that there appear to be so few life forms in the universe, the fact that life does not appear to crowd the universe, may in fact indicate that the universe is young, and, like all young things, hot. But the propagation of life is the inverse exhuming value of the cosmic universe.

When energy is subtracted and subtracted, which by the way does not need to be done because all things naturally lose energy, but when energy is subtracted, that is, when things stop being chaotic, when they stop dancing like salsa queens move their asses, when things cool down, which means that they stop moving, hot things move, the hotter a thing is the more it moves, and the hotter a thing is the less it cares what is near it; the sun is hot, the sun is moving, the sun is chaotic, it is mad, it is crazy, and the sun lacks consciousness, if it were to swallow the earth it would not notice it, nor could it care, because when you are that hot, you melt anything that comes near you, which is to say your ability to assimilate your environment, your environmental influence is phenomenal; but the colder you get, the less that you affect those around you and the less that you matter to them; people want to be in hot environments because the nature of things is that the hotter you are the better off you are; but as things cool, as they lose their heat, they start caring more, and they care more because they need the energy of those around them in order to amount to anything! In a universe infested by energy nothing means that you are less, more than a low energy count. So when energy is subtracted things stop bumping into each other, they cease attacking each other, that is right, they cease to be so indifferent to one another; low energy states begin to acquire knowledge of externals, of things outside of themselves, this development of consciousness means that the most peaceful thing in the universe, the least warring thing in the universe is a human being. Being the lowest possible state of energy, before reaching nothingness, life is by far the least intrusive, the most isolated, the least likely to violate another energy state. Life, however, wants to violate another energy state, because life has a consciousness acquired from a settling, but this consciousness has a cosmic history. A history that tells it that once it was everything, a history that tells it that once it was everywhere and infinite and limitless. Of course energy is only limitless and infinite at the highest quantum levels; and, since everything is following the second law of thermodynamics, the reality is that even for particles suffering the highest states of energy infinity is temporary. Humanity, having once been in a high energy state, can at least comfort itself with the reality that it was indeed at one time infinite, everything and everywhere. But as things cool they acquire separation, they solidify into separate entities, and separate entities lose velocity, acquire time, age and die a cold death! All things that are immortal will perish.

The problem is all cooling down, cooling down leads to isolation, isolation leads to more cooling down; the less close you are to another thing, the more you get cold, the less friction, the less in touch you are; in order to touch everything you have to really confine yourself and this requires energy concentration. The way that high energy particles manage to contract space is through concentration; they amass themselves, that is a lot of pressure that squeezes energy particles making it seem like they are always blasting through space, and when you are under severe pressure you can be touching everything that is compressing you, and it takes a lot of compression to maintain high energy which is to say that everything is right up against you; and when everything is right up against you, it is hard to escape, and it is very difficult to tell which part is you and which part is not you; high energy states do not have distinguishable entities; high energy particles can not tell each other apart, which is precisely why they can appear in completely different points of space simultaneously.

Cooling entities however are isolated, separated and the more they cool the more they separate. When a lover is not hot for you they with become cold towards you; it requires energy to stay close to another entity, there is a lot of friction that keeps a relationship together, two lovers are closer to each other the more and more that they rub against one another; but if a lover falls out of that fusing condition we call love, they will get cold and when they get cold they will begin to alienate the other, and if so then the relationship will suffer the law that states that cooling down separates entities. All relationships are, by entropy’s harsh standards, temporary. Nothing is colder and more distant than a dead person. Suffering extreme isolation is how far apart humanity is from high energy, that hot and happening cosmic universe that makes us individuals arrested in a cold region and perishing in time faster than the speed of light. Lack of unity, isolation, is the real thing that afflicts humanity, no longer high energy and on its way to perdition. At any given point more of humanity is dying, life, in order to exist, vanquishes more of itself, at any given time more of life is buried underneath the ground than lives above it. Life energy steps on itself to cruise on the surface and borders of nothingness.

As we acquire more unification however we are in fact making more divine energy, but we are reducing real energy; distributing energy more evenly, this because we exist on the margin of energy manifestations, and anyway we can not exist in places where there are high energy concentrations. Life is moderate by commandment, by the nature of its existence, and so we, as the edge of the cosmic rage compromise with nothingness as much as we compromise with energy. The closer that an entity gets to zero the more and more that it solidifies and the more and more that it is joined to other entities via symmetry. We work together via these symmetrical connections, which are almost as solid as we are only a little less solid. And it is that stringing fragility which holds us together as a superimposed consciousness, which must works with minuscule amounts of energy.

It may please you or it maybe a consolation of sorts, that you will never reach absolute zero as yourself. You will always be an entity in life as life, in any other condition you will not be this self that you are. Which is a good thing because the type of consciousness that we have is only valid and real in this our current condition. But your life is temporary, it is a transition phase, you are on your way into nothingness, just like others before you have gone into that nothingness, and the only way for you to prevent your cooling perdition is to stay alive, alive as the entity that you are, which is a bit on the conservative side if you ask me. I mean you are on your way down why stay here, experiencing absolute zero, and experiencing finality, is the only way for an infinite energy to experience everything. Your finality is part of your infinity.

As all things that are opposite are nothing but reflections of the same thing, it may please you more to know that as things cool to absolute zero, they begin to be more and more the same, they cease to resist each other, they become frictionless, they super-conduct, which is to say that they collaborate with each other to be more and more of the same thing. They move in the same way, they adopt the same identical principles of operation. This very solidifying condition, this unity in isolation, is what produces the consistency that you observe from this perspective as nothingness. Nothingness is nothing more than everything behaving the same, nothingness is the inevitable homogenization of the universe. Nothingness has everything in it but nothing juxtaposes against it. Harmony is the eventual summary of high energy conflict. The cosmic is nothing more than boiling nothingness, and so as you may refuse your eventual demise into negative energy, just remember that infinity is behind the cosmic evolutionary curve.

ALL CONSCIOUSNESS SIMMERS AND AT ONCE OPERATES AT MAXIMUM POTENTIAL

2006-09-04T18:16:00.000-07:00

There has always been the question of how much we can really accomplish as individuals and as a humanity; there seems to never be a clear picture of what humanities incredible potential is. Humanity always seems more capable that it appears, and it operates under the pretence that each and all of its parts are under-performing in relation to an objectified potential.

The universal problem presented by this misconception is that our universe does not conserve. Our universe does not hold back; it does not over exceed either, it performs precisely as would be expected of a universe that has as much inherent energy as ours does, when an accumulation of energy occurs, if it is sufficient it explodes, if it is not it simmers, but it does not hold in reserve secret quantities of potential that are not known to itself. In short the universe does not in any way plan for the future. The future happens this much is true, and it may indeed happen because of some or all of our actions. But these actions are all based on maximums, they happen because they happen not because they can in any way be contrived to produce futures. A universe is in the end nothing but an consciousness that is aware of finality and seeks to reverse it through grandeur.

There are however only, and I must say, fortunately, two real scenarios for the universe to exist in, that is if it is to be assumed real. If the universe is not real there are infinite scenarios that can make unrealities. Impossible things are inherently extremely complicated, this is because they require a perverse and incessant amount of imagination for them to exist. Due to their ephemeral nature, their construct being the most artificial thing in the universe, they thus require infinite amounts of energy and imagination. This is particularly difficult because a thing that is not real can not directly consume externals to use them as nutrition. An unreal thing must first convince an entity that has a consciousness to reproduce it, and, what is for the unreal even more terrible, it can not just reach into the consciousness for expression, rather the consciousness has to discover it, stumble upon it and perhaps find it useful in some way. After an entity decides to propagate an impossible thing then that impossible thing lives on consuming the real universe via that entity. But it is most interesting and fantastic that impossible things exist only as ideas and that the things that they consume and use to propagate themselves are indeed real, while a real entity might be willing to die for an idea an idea would never suffer the consequences. Unreal things we can say are hypothetical parasites. The idea of a magic genie or a god are for instance very difficult to conjure as a reality, however they are both kept alive as an impossible through an infinite reaffirmation of historical imaginations. So these hypothetical parasites are known not so much because as entities we know them but rather because we see the results of their actions. In the end to molest thought so as to answer questions with things that are highly improbable is to place thought in an infinity of potential, not possible but done everyday just to answer questions that may not even have any answers. It is conceivable for instance that the universe never had a beginning and if this is so asking questions of origins is real life malfeasance. This is why our type of universe is favored, direct processes that consume, react and are consumed, it is less impossible to construct, it is more narrow, more knowable, more shall we say directly aware and real.

So our universe, fortunately for us, falls into the category of imaginably real. We can focus and because of that finality of detail we can narrow it down to two possible scenarios. One the universe exist only inside of our individual consciousness and is infinite because we are spherical in character. The fact that we detect a curvature in time and space is merely an acknowledgement of the curvature inherent in our consciousness. Such obligatory individual consciousness even in the singular is universal in scope and infinite within itself; but not really infinite due to its individuality, individual entities do of course have a finality to themselves, thought it may appear infinite to any internal or external individual entities or to a gregarious consciousness. But fortunately for those that don’t want to tolerate absolute egotism, internalized individual universes do not generally have room for anything outside of themselves. It does not even reduce their selfishness any to say that for that matter neither do their more generous counterparts which we shall call gregarious universes because they coexist with other consciousness, but such universes are agglomerations of similarities, hardly all encompassing. So individual universes outside of themselves are impossible, their consciousness does not allow it, there is nothing that can substantiate the possibly different nature of a universe outside of itself; its consciousness only thinks and feels in reference to itself, all things to it will appear or become familiar with proximity, and strangely alien or unknown with any acquisition of distance. But all things in this, and any consciousness in it would be composed of the same elemental particle of ideas, there would and ought to be no reason to suspect that anything truly different and original could or can exist inside of any absolute consciousness, and if something so alien and unique did appear, expect shock and immediate rejection and destruction to occur.

Because of the previously stated impossibility of impossibles, and the necessary familiarity of any conscientious awareness, the universe from any angle is merely a compilation of consciousness, an agreed reality and vision; and yet it has no external capacity to make arrangements with any consciousness that is willing to be fellow cohabitant. This and any universe is in the end impervious to reason, and it is so because the universe is instantaneous and reason requires analysis; the universe and this or any type of universe is most irrational always! This is not a universal option, insignificant systems of consciousness may find rational useful, but to the universe it would be a detriment. So the universe as it exist is an agglomeration of one or many globular structures of irrational consciousness, as linked together because they share the same view of the universe, not because they reason it so, but rather share an inherent view which will, incidentally impose upon them forces and laws, which are not easily appropriated and assimilated as individual creations, or as necessarily beneficial to this or that individual.

The absolute agglomerated consciousness universe, one with many as oppose to the one with one, will still be infinite also because consciousness, like character, its nature is spherical, individual consciousness forms singular multiple sphere, incomplete without the other, more to not know that is, spheres of awareness of consciousness formed as a series of connecting amorphous structures with no absolute definition for size or shape. Consciousness can be great or small; the only genuine rule being that no structure of consciousness is to express geometrical sharpness ever nor at any level. Curvature is thus a fundamental component of the nature of all things. The reason why straight lines are so dutifully avoided its because they would reach an unknown, a straight line can keep going into an unexplored obscurity, a curvature maintains a reference point to itself, curvature allows for one to always reference the self, curved lines can always return to themselves or at least hold that promise if they need to, straight lines do not have this option, linearity has no historical reference, it can not look back on itself; consciousness is not a free floater, it requires reference to self, and even a chained conscious universe, needs to touch other curvatures to maintain an inherent warmth that will perish if all points in space continue to disperse from one another in straight lines. Curvatures in space are then evidence of a universe, or universes that are always willing to return to themselves, a universe or universes that have a sense of history, and universes that are paranoid of wondering beyond their own awareness.

There you have it, all the possible universes reduced to two. One of only one or one of many. This is less preposterous that you might imagine because if the universe exist as we imagine it, it exist as much because of our imagination as that is formulated by our consciousness, which may or may not have an accurate picture of the universe; but more it is that if the universe allows consciousness to arise, it is absurd to imagine that that consciousness would not have something in common with the universe that it inhabits. Things that do not know each other do not know each other and have nothing in common. By virtue of the fact that the universe allows our exploration of it, it tells us that we are a part of it, and as part of the universe highly given to guess its ways correctly, because they are in a sense our ways.

A universe with other conscious entities vs. a universe with only a singular consciousness may appear very different, one a populace of globular consciousness entities joined from spherical hip to spherical hip, and the other a mere singular individual needing no joints; but because they are real possibilities they can replace each other at will, and are indeed more likely to be a reflection of one another than complete unmatchable opposites. One might be as much a refinement of the other in that in one of one entity the subjective self builds itself regardless of the externals and in the one of many entities the same subjective essence is compromised to external relationships so as to accomplish astronomical grandeur. That is all for one idea of consciousness. The reason for this boring bricklayer sameness of a very different construct has already been given, a universe if possible shares infinite similarities with other possible universes because they are all possible; just like impossible universes would have more in common with impossible universes that with real ones.

It is entirely possible then to imagine an evolution that would allow for one singular consciousness universe to evolve into a multiple consciousness universe; or for the reverse of that, a multiple consciousness universe to evolve into a singular consciousness universe; or it is even possible for two same or different universes to collide with minor infractions and evolve as a singular or as a plurality of consciousness.

A universe inhabited by a single consciousness colliding with a universe inhabited with multiple entities of consciousness would be more likely to merge and lose its individual consciousness as it disperses under the combine weight of all of the individual consciousness entities, because they are likely to have greater energies and more variedly define energies than the one energy as represented by a singular consciousness. Varied energies will always represent a greater challenge to singular energies even if they are equals; a singular energy of consciousness will need disproportional amounts of greater consciousness on its side to successfully compete against diverse lower energies. But odds aside It is possible to imagine that if an individual consciousness universe, in colliding with a multiplicity of consciousness universe, if it has a greater definition of self, and if it is more entwined in its idea of self, that it could absorbed and re-channel gregarious consciousness unto its complete self, as itself in part becomes a very gargantuan consciousness. Or if the singular consciousness being massive in self energy may still not overcome the gregarious consciousness yet it could dispersed as self, dispersed within individual conscientious entities, immersed as self locally at the periphery and disappearing towards the center of agglomerated consciousness but yet converting others to itself thought more converted to the ways of the larger gregarious consciousness. It would be partially interpreted as the god thing in that universe because of its configured greatness. But it would not necessarily be known in all parts of that universe, it would have to proliferate from the regions where it collided with the gregarious universe and expand as permitted by the potential energies contained within it, or and with any conscious energies converted in that vicinity. It could then in theory reverse its own demise.

Now remember that the opposing happening is more likely, because again we are dealing with things that are more possibles here, and as you well by now know possibles make for possibles. Suppose that the agglomeration of consciousness universe were more ideally advanced, more aware of its energizing reality, if it were to collide with an individual conciseness universe, it, the individual universe alone would cease to have any real meaning or value to itself. Its identity would be lost in the vast agglomerated consciousness of the greater universe. Such a consciousness might, if possessed of real strength, certainly contrive at least a nova splash entrance into the greater universe, but it would fade and immerse quickly, converting most of its consciousness into the consciousness already in existence in the universal agglomeration; the vestiges of its consciousness time would certainly erase.

It is also possible that a universe with a singular consciousness will brake apart under the weight of its own consciousness and assume an agglomeration of individual consciousness. Consider if you will that the universe is one infinite consciousness and this infinite consciousness begins to acquire confusion, infinity has the ability to violate the laws of universal awareness, that is a thing knows itself and knows itself intuitively even if it refuses to recognize itself; a thing always acts on its own best interest, but in an infinity of self an entity may acquire a confusion of self and not recognize some of its own parts as parts of the self; when this occurs those ignored parts of the self consciousness, will developed a thinning out disparity of consciousness, which will allow for the separation of that part of the consciousness from its greater consciousness, the separation is of course by virtue of association never complete, it therefore maintains a link which will invariably relate to the greater consciousness. But here is the fascinating aspect of this breaking of awareness. The younger consciousness will have a tendency to grow faster that the more mature consciousness, this is due to the principle of inherent identity, a consciousness even if partial inherently understands where it once was as part of the greater consciousness, so its consciousness will expand at a faster dynamic rate to accomplish its understood sense self, as such was formulated by its cosmic memory of attachment; and in so expeditiously doing will, sooner than the large consciousness is older, assume an almost equal role in the new and combined universe of awareness that they form as two of one. The two of one is limitless of course and the split process, once it has been done once roots inevitably and nicely, this is because the hardest part of anything is original inception, replication is easier, which is why inception is so rare, originality is difficult to produce, which makes it more possible to imagine that there was and never will be such a thing. This individual explosion of one consciousness within the consciousness of another can multiply, and so there may indeed be a universe ever growing with parts of individual consciousness that are sort of braking off of it, and serving to make it greater, by expansion but less by separation.

The fact that an individual universe can sort of break apart under its own weight of ignorance leads for a consciousness of expansion that the infinite consciousness sees as a danger to itself because it approaches the possibility of an impossible, the straight line problem. The more you split a consciousness and the more that consciousness grows, the less the curvature, the more that expansion will seem further out into the infinity of things, which with growth becomes more and more distant by cause of separation; and it is this very process that causes the consciousness to want to bring all of its dissenting parts back together into a single universe. This being the case the singular consciousness will seek to implode, to collapse upon itself so as to bring all of its parts back into a universal singularity of absolute possession of self. Unfortunately for the mass consciousness its parts being more distant from its conscious center perceive this implosion of self as a negative, why it is a cavernous death for them which thought part of the same have some what acquire an independence. So as much as the great attractor wants to bring them together, they will insist in maintaining a separation, and that separation will be completely dependent on how fast they have matured to equal the consciousness that is now seeking to arrest them back into itself.

If each individual consciousness has the potential to reach the actual consciousness of the greater consciousness because as one part of it they have a complete ingrained history map of it; this is again why they grow dynamically faster because they are not initially learning themselves, they are merely reproducing themselves, only their adventurous reproduction is taking place in another dimension and or point of space and time, and so two things can happen that will determine their independence from the parent.

In scenario one the different time, space dimensions inhabited by the developing consciousness may foster a more beneficial growth or a more diverse growth in which case the larger consciousness will have a more difficult time re-channeling that consciousness back into itself. More accelerated growth will equal more distance, more distance means that the greater consciousness will have a more difficult time reaching all of its parts. More distance and growth can also mean that the consciousness can acquire an inequality of consciousness or even a more massive consciousness, in which case who pulls who together begins to be a problem for the older consciousness.

A new and greater one than the older consciousness will have a very difficult time bringing that consciousness together into itself, because of their difference they will not chain as well, so the more different the greater new consciousness is from the older consciousness, the more likely that they are to cohabitate in each others vicinities without one imploding into the other; that is without swallowing each other. But suppose that the space time and dimensional circumstance is the same? If so then the new and greater personality of consciousness will surely swallow the other because compatibility assimilates, and it this way it increases itself, eats its parent, and it increases the curvature, by length, of its universe; which is to say that it avoids the straight line problem. A singularity in space is simply the most curved onto itself thing in the universe.

As these consciousness approach each other they of course what to prevent their arrival into each other because this is a problem for their individuality of consciousness and so they always try to go around each other, in the blind hope that they will have time to acquire more greater consciousness so as to be the arresting force rather than the arrested force. This process is the impediment, that forces everything in the universe to approach each other in a curved path. Conflict avoidance is fundamental to the maintenance of any consciousness.

But conflict avoidance has its limitations, as a consciousness acquires greater consciousness it wants to become one with everything and so it seeks to channels everything into itself, it seeks conformity, it wants to embodied everything, and to be everything and to equal any and all sums. This massive consensus of consciousness either isolated or in the aggregate will try to string-out all orbits so that they center immediately upon itself.

And it is the imposition of self, the imposition of everything that I am that really creates the potential energy in the universe, and the potential energy in the universe is always max out, a thing of consciousness, or a thing of matter, which are by the way the same, can never operate at 90 percent or at 110 percent; a thing is always operating with, 100 percent, all energy values that are possible to its consciousness. And this is because it takes a lot of energy to keep distance in space, and it takes much more energy to acquire other things from space, and it requires infinite energy to maintain consciousness so consciousness thus operates at maximum potential at all times.

At a more terminal level there is no room for you to exceed yourself, dissatisfaction is only possible when you imagine the things that you can not do, because if you are satisfied with what your consciousness can do, then you are satisfied with who you are. The untapped potential that you may think your consciousness possesses is non existence. When a body has a lot of energy it explodes, and then it simmers, both are aspects of the same thing, energy used and energy dissipation based on immediate ability. The universal and the individual conscious is max out.

So the universe has a fantastic idea about potential, but it is mostly impossible because the universe is already operating at its own full potential which again maybe a condition of apparent inflammation, or a simmering condition which may appear as a contraction but it is not; rather it is an expansion which disperses; all dispersing expansions appear as contractions because the consciousness reads itself as disappearing. A false impression but in the case of that particular dispersing consciousness some what terribly valid.

Following this very perverse logic you must wonder why everything would need to assume such an absolutist potential performance option, a valid concern. The reason of this unreasonable unexploded potential impossibility is burdened upon you and all consciousness by infinity. The crux is that if our universe, and even every other universe, out there turns out to be finite, infinity will not. There is no other side to infinity and the reason why there is no other side for infinity is because while our consciousness exist only under containment, that containment is impossible for infinity. The fact then, that regardless of all things finite, there is an underlying infinity that can not be perceived by an expanding consciousness, an attempt at perception is declared by its very expansion, but regardless, that infinity has inherent indifference to that understanding; a difference caused because everything happens within infinity, infinity can not expand, all expansion takes place within infinity. More important any detection of movement, or of progress is evidence of the finality inherent within a thing; but infinity which is equal to nothingness does not suffer geometry, it does not have a center, or an edge, perplexingly however, all of its parts are equal which makes it perversely powerful even as all the nothingness that it is. Infinity is in all points of space at once, but it may not be any larger than a neutrino which appears to travel fast not so much because of velocity but rather because like infinity, it is in so many places at once.

You as you exist today can not know infinity, and if you were to become a part of the infinity you would not know it, infinity does not need to be aware of itself because it is at the top of the food chain, it consumes all things that are finite and that have an edge, and never changes in the process. Infinity consumes but this does not mean that it matures or expands, infinity can not be any larger because it is already infinite, infinity does not have dynamic, nor can infinity be measured in volume because infinity does not, unlike your consciousness, acknowledge time. This is why ever expanding into the infinity, consciousness and universes are forever extending themselves to their maximum potential, reaching more for their finality than their suppose mass agglomeration; infinity dictates simmering because it is under you feet, it dictates a finality for all things that are struggling energy. To consume nothingness is impossible for things that exist while nothingness can and does consume existence; to consume and inhabit infinity is insanely impossible for a finality; your mortality is born out of an infinity, the fundamental anguish that awaits any consciousness is its relational finality, as it will be imposed by its subsiding struggle against nothingness simply because it can not understand finality within infinity. Fundamentally life and consciousness do not make munch sense, and both life and consciousness are the same things, same things that are discovered by each other, when things are closest to their finality, in the face of a true infinity.

A BODY AT REST DISSIPATES ENERGY AT AN ACCELERATED RATE

2006-09-04T18:15:00.000-07:00

The unfortunate and cruel reality for life then is obvious we do not have the energy to exist in the universe, we have one of the shortest life spans, and I do not mean by this in years but rather in speed, our experience of the universe is not limited by the time we live but rather by our velocity. We are the snails of the universe so are not able to take advantage of relative time.

A body at rest consumes the highest amount of energy this is because a body at rest is completely moving through time. Time is as fast as the speed of light exactly at the point where you are standing still. The more you move, the more time you have because time slows down with acceleration. But humanity suffers aging because it has accepted time as its habitat, which is to say life has speeded its relative existence to maximum potential.

ENERGY IN NOTHINGNESS AND INFINITY

2006-09-04T18:11:00.000-07:00

So we now know that the infinite and nothingness are so absolute in their value system that they do not give us a sense of their existence. Nothingness and Infinity are technically impossible to prove. Yet we conceive their existence not so much because we observe it but rather because we observe ourselves and our agglomerated consciousness full of well lighted matter universes, as produced by time and space. So nothingness and infinity two of one are not something that we can prove. How can you prove the strength of nothingness other than by proving that for things to exist in being they have to reach high concentrations of energy, and even at the low end perimeter of energy, consciousness requires steeply huge and relatively massive amounts of energy. The fact that things perish if their energy is not constantly fueled is a fact that is foolish to dispute, question it enough and then cease consumption and within days the results will clarify any misconceptions. Reality is in the end a struggling disparity within a plateau of sameness.

Further the one way nature of time, the tendency of time to formulate itself as a one way directional, does imply that time does have a point of origin, things that are linear in nature and there is no arrow that is more straight than time; time may slow and time may go faster but the one thing time can not do is reverse itself. You can of course go backwards in time, this is true condition for you, but not for time. Time can not go back upon itself, time is the straightest line in the universe, the most precise ruler, the champion of precision, and it is here that I must tell you the horror, time in a universe that is curved, is straight, it leads straight into perdition in the infinity, straight into nothingness, you can’t look deep enough into the future to see the end of time because time being a stellar linearist, a true ruler is always born before the entity that uses it as a method of measure. Time is therefore the closest entity to the infinity, it is the most near thing to nothingness, and it is brutal in its violation of intrinsic curvature.

In the graph above you can see how the curvature of space is most dramatic and extreme at the spiritual level, at such a level is the extreme of the escape from the infinity of nothingness, it logically peaks and narrows at this level because of its apparent impossibility. Not only does life end up living at the perimeter and borderline of nothingness, but because it is an explosive flow from the corporal body of nothingness, it is the coldest, the most aged, the most burnt up portion of the energy process. Life is the most energy efficient property of a cosmic energy escape condition, the mind is remarkably energy efficient, a thought is practically energyless, which is what you would expect from a creature that nearing its cosmic perdition, yet wanting to keep its identity suddenly must answer one very important and the only real question: Can we exist in a zero energy state or in another unimaginable condition? This is the biggest question nothing else matters if we can’t answer this one.

You must wonder how I dare to make this the all encompassing question and I will be happy but sad to explain: You see, the curvature of space is a telling and terrible biographical comment on our escape. Any escape action such as the one we have attempted from nothingness, ever changing disguises in order to continue our existence in a volatile energy state, in the most irrational condition imaginable because it is the least sustainable, and it is the least sustainable because the infinity of nothingness requires no effort to sustain, and that which is a default value, that which is the most constant thing in the universe, is the most rational, the last thing we want as life is to default to that rationality, we want to be irrational, we want life to be sustainable by other means, and the cosmic exists to try to prove and to function as the irrational.

Now there are only two types of escapes, false and real escapes. A false escape is one that is a deception or that is not successful. A prisoner, probably the clearest personification of a need to escape the singular condition of incarceration, can escape and his escape condition will have two choices: to be a true escape or a false escape. A true escape is one in which the prisoner really escapes, that is, a more straight condition than a curved condition, although there will always be the possibility of returning to prison because a character that is in trouble with the law is probably at odds with the law in general and so such a character will have a high curvature possibility of returning to prison, a character that has the least curvature that is the least in common with legal improprieties, that is the least in common with the prison system will stand clear of it in the long run and therefor we can say that it has accomplished a straight escape with the least potential to return to the escaped condition: Incarceration.

But if our character is a felon, a creature that rubs the justice system frequently the wrong way, that is, one that touches it a lot, and that feels himself through it, that individual will have the tendency to carry out actions that are acknowledged by the legal system and such an individual will most certainly be caught in that orbit and as much justify the existence of the system that punishes him. In short, a prisoner creates and feeds the very system that he must despise and truly wish to abolish. Again while we can discuss the symbiotic nature of this strange relationship, for it is most interesting how they both depend on one another; our main point is to understand that a true escape is not possible for the prisoner that embodies the illegalities that justice most feeds upon. Justice will seek out the felon with the tenacity used by any predator seeking its prey because justice depends on finding criminals for its existence. So a fellow that meets the criteria for prey will certainly leave a trail that can be sniffed out by eager justice, and so it is most likely that justice will find him again at odds with legal structures and imprison him. Such a man will not acquire a true escape, his curvature will arc back into the cell.

There are possibilities for a true escape, two that I know of, there may be more, but I rather doubt it. The first possibility for the escape is for the prisoner to find a way out, either by digging a hole to escape through or by running out the clock of his sentence. Either way, the individual simply has to make sure to stay in a straight course away from the grasp of the law. Anything that the escaped or released man does that will somehow arouse suspicion, or cause legal forces to go into action, will increase curvature. If the experience was unpleasant enough we can then assume that the man will change his ways and because of that will maintain a sort of jagged linearity away from the grasp of justice. These are true escapes; a man that has changed enough out of a clear desire not to live in an imprisoned condition again will not suffer severe curvature before his life is exhausted.

To accomplish a true escape you have to change yourself enough so that the thing that catches you in that particular condition will not recognize you, it will leave you alone, it will have nothing in common with you. Things only smell similarities; the justice system is a hound dog, it uses criminal instinct to smell out a criminal, so change, fundamental change, is key for the prisoner to avoid prison, and the further away you want to be from the clutches of justice the more you have to change yourself away from the crime. And the change can not be merely a decision, things that hide attract justice, justice does not think that honest things need to protect from it because it does not feed on honest things, the idea that justice might confuse an honest person for prey is considered an abnormally. It is probably safe to assume that this is true because if justice is going hungry if there are not enough criminals then it starts netting, netting is when justice feels deprived of resources and is striving for criminal justification for feeding, so it begins to erect nets, nets are laws, laws that restrict more and more, and thus bring-out more prey for justice to feed upon, so the erection of laws is most necessary in a law abiding society, this is because the justice will need to expand within every frame of that society. Lawless societies will always have less regulation and justice simply because there is plenty of lawlessness for justice to flower in, further the more laws there are the more technicalities that justice will have to execute to catch its prey and so it is inherently in the interest of justice that fewer restriction be in existence so that it can go brutal at will. So the point is you need to really not touch the justice system so as not to feed it with your energies at any level. In civilized societies this becomes very difficult because civilized societies having a greater degree of order need to imagine illegalities, that is to imagine crimes and then to make those imaginary crimes real enough so as to incarcerate a person. This is what happens when justice seeks to encompass everything and to reach every aspect of a life to sustain its own existence. If you are an ideal person, one that does not break any laws and is always aware of what is the wrong thing to do, then you are a perfectly boring person but one that has acquired a sort of parallel linearity with justice, and so you will never experience the rigors of its courts and the life consuming power of its prisons. You will have accomplished a parallel linearity with justice.

But all that has a taste of still somehow being in the clutches of what is our sample entity justice, you are still somehow influenced by it, you are in a sense still it’s victim and certainly suffering the possibility that as justice grows, it will invariably need to consume all life. That pure justice is impossible because it is largely inconceivable is not something that can be acknowledge by justice. And so you might remember that I mentioned that there are two possible ways for the escape to be complete, both by the way share one thing in common, transformation. To acquire a linearity from justice you must be unrecognizable to it. Of course this is merely a physical and principled escape and one that you must hold suspect because justice is a substrata of your consciousness, it exist within it, it does not exist outside of it, and somehow it embodies it and so to alienate justice is to alienate o portion of yourself that you may or may not find useful. You are technically a substrata of nothingness, you can find the beginning and the end of justice but you can not find the beginning nor the end of nothingness and infinity. Justice might be hurt because you reject it for you are after all the very thing that grants its existence, and so justice will always want to justify herself to you, and it will attempt to prove to you that even as she consumes you she is in your best interest. The fact that it steals yourself energy can be hidden under such justification. All entities behave like this and it is imperative that they somehow fundamentally alter our reality for us to accept them. In a sense justice like philosophy, religion or poetry serves to increase our proportion in being and so while we are certainly swallowed by it, we are also more because of it, the artificial entity is a way for us to reach out further and further into the incomprehensibility of what might be an other wise sterile existence. And that this leads us to the other forms of escape is perhaps more liberating, it is the idea, the imagination of an escape, the placing of your soul and self in an alternate reality that is not touchable by the pervasive forces of that which accumulates itself under your feet, and circles and constricts them like a python.

The other form of escape then is the idea, power free almost, the mind, that is not a brain, the mind that can perceive without registering its existence in space time, a mind that can technically exist in the subzero nature of everything and exist in the absolute high temperature of everything, a mind that is independent of evolution, a consciousness that exist as an entity and as an entity that has character but is not subject to absolutes, that is the one that can inhabit and study the nothingness of its origins, the one that can begin to discern a difference in structure, the one that can assert that their pockets of energy in nothingness, the one that can see an anomaly where there are none, that mind will formulate the final escape velocity from nothingness. Today the perimeter that that consciousness inhabits is as wide as where it is hottest and as low as where it is coldest, those are its boundaries but the external of that, the incomprehensible that gives rise to this which we really are is where we want our mind to go, powered from here perhaps, attracted into an intolerable environment of infinity and nothingness by the mere choice to do so, by its desire, by its will, by its incessant appetite to occupy everything not by the rules of the infinite but rather by its intemperate will. How to acquire a linearity from nothingness if you can’t? How to acquire an liberation from the diminishing energy? How to acquire life as a pure idea that can breath in nothingness? This is the escape question that must be and is in part being thought out by our humanity.

Our cosmic repulsion and overreaction to the nothingness and indifference of an infinity that simmers is a renegade attempt at making something, at giving a value to something, at isolating a condition from an immensity that can not be measured or adulterated by value. Can we operate in a zero energy state; having fought the big fight of forcing a massive discomforting level of energy accumulation, that even with all its creative force was not strong enough to be thrown outward but merely implodes into itself, creating a massive bulbous curvature, what are we to expect. For nothing is more interesting than the fact that our explosion from nothingness was not a picture of a real or absolute escape we are imploding back into the nothingness, and the curvature of the universe hands out eviction notices constantly. The universe is going to implode, the universe is not expanding forever, it is flattening out into the infinity point and that is where our origin registers. Let me graph it out for you:

False Escape Geometry has Inherent Curvature and theoretically an inherent left tendency back into the nothingness.

Infinity nothingness

True Escape Geometry has zero curvature but mimics curvature with geodesic spheres

universe

infinity nothingness

In the above figures you can see the explosive nature of a true escape universe vs. the explosive nature of the false escape universe. We live in the false escape universe and we are unfortunate that we did not accomplish a true escape universe on our first attempt at escaping the infinity of nothingness. The difference is very important because you certainly can overcome an infinity with another infinity; this may seem a bit challenging to apprehend but you just have to look at it from the perspective of equals, equals can coexist but non equals must consume each other. The simmering nature of the universe dictates that all disparity must be equaled and so disparities must consume each other to avoid the equalizing and dispersing force of simmering. So all consumption is based on inequality. All relationships are fundamentally based on equality, disparity always consume. So two infinities can coexist based on the fundamental laws that makes equals technically the same indiscernible thing, equals share similarities at absolute levels, two infinities share infinity in common so they can not consume each other, this is the wonderful part of the everything, but it is also the most troubling because it is it is difficult to obtain equality when nothingness in its infinity has had the lead due to an infinite amount of time. All things that startup with time start out with a maximum handicap and it is to overcome this time problem that is technically interesting in our existence. You can look at this many angles but an existence is technically attempting to overcome two things one simmering which entails a lot of nothingness and the other time. In order for life to persist in an infinity it will have to max itself out as the sole occupier of its infinity, in order words it must first conquer the universe and beyond, only then will life have equal footing with nothingness. The possibility of this is mapped out by its inherent desire to see everything and be everything but life must really become in touch with all of its parts to accomplish this formidable challenge, and there are many parts of life that struggle against other parts of life, and so the great question is can life bring harmony to the universe or will something else homogenize it, there are many competing factors that have it in their interest to make the universe in their image, humanity is just on aspect of this, and its consciousness one brilliant possibility but it is born in the darkest recesses of space which makes it hope against the ever increasing impossibility. Life as you and I know it is the final battle cry of the universe, so your option is to crystallize the universe and to bring more order and symmetry into it, it is a containment strategy, and can such work?

The straight arrow universe allows for the infinity to be absolute, there might not be any curvature is such a universe, a sphere would find it difficult to inhabit, but such a universe would certainly absolve the geodesic as the nearest thing to sphere, this because the geodesic would have the value that it could use to use historic elements to its advantage. It is possible to imagine a linear universe that is born from the wreckage of a curved universe, and if so it stand to reason that there might be advantages to curvature that thought impossible to obtain in the linear universe might still be obtainable through the heavy application of geodesics. The abuse of geodesics by the linear universe will lead to a most fascinating development, time will have the ability to travel in all geodesic directions, that is correct, time would be able to travel in all geodesic directions, and this would give such a universe a diversity of time experience that would put it a lot closer to infinity. In nothingness time is allowed to travel in all directions it undulates, it wobbles, it oscillates, it waves, it particles, and because of this time propagates incessantly in every direction, this of course means that nothingness gets flooded with time and flooded with time is what makes an infinity. There is time everywhere and in every direction, in an infinity time goes through everything, it has absolute right of passage and this gives nothingness, thanks to its lack of rigidity, the infinity it do desires for itself. So a geodesic universe will have be a little closer to infinity, it will be closer to being flooded with time but it will not be timeless until time inhabits every aspect of it, which its straight line geometry will defy, so here the immediate problem for such a universe is that it must at some point brake its symmetry, ouch, which incidentally is the cause of its strength. At what point the breakage of symmetry takes place in the geodesic universe will also determine if it will survive, symmetry breaking is a tortuous affair, but it is necessary for time to be amorphously absorbed in all directions, if when the universe breaks apart it does not have enough of a sense of self so as to reference all of its parts without connections, it is this reference of self that holds nothingness together so well, and it is when this disconnect takes place that determines weather something will continue to be itself or perish into something in less discord within itself. Regardless at some point the linear universe, with all its geodesic beauty will have to break the crystal to allow time the absolute freedom that it requires to be infinity.

The linear geodesic universe may have it problems but at least it has a good chance at infinity, the curved universe with only one direction of time has the problem of needing to liberate time at every level, it is the farthest possible from infinity, one less direction of time and the whole thing disappears, really! You can’t subtract time from a curved one dimension universe, to do so is immediate death, complete death. So how can we overcome all of the obvious finality that accompany us. to greatness;

So it would have been entirely to angle our infinity from the infinity that now possesses us but this would have required a more absolute sense from nothingness. Not an easy thing to accomplish. How can I say this with such certainty, because the universe is curved, this means that our universe is irreversibly to implode back into itself, and more backwards back into nothingness.

When a universal consciousness manages to accidentally acquire an energy agglomeration within nothingness it explodes into existence it is the volatility of that existence and by volatility I mean the energy content in it that determines the longevity of its escape. The more force the escape has, that is the more energy that explodes the more straight the universe, absolute straightness would inherently give rise to an infinity, there is always the problem that since from any angle you are really exploding within the corporal structure of nothingness that any infinity will inevitably reach out into its own nothingness but we are unfortunately so far away from this condition that we shall not worry about it here. The relevant point here is that if the agglomeration of energy is high enough and it manages to go straight, it will acquire a polygonic structure that will permit for it to rob nothingness of time from more than one angle. It will siphon more time by allowing it to flow within its body in more directions. To allow time to travel in more directions within the confines of structure requires massive concentrations of energy, in nothingness there are no patterns, time is diluted, but time faced with a universal structure will generally abstain from participation, this is because time loves infinity just like anyone else, and so it finds itself, in a most precarious situation, one in which it has to limit itself, a conditional structure that makes it travel with a sense of direction, and focus, a structure channels time, and so the inherent complexity of a structure will determine the flows of time within that structure. Time is generally infinite, but within the confines of a universe time can come naught, a universe is not inherently infinite, because time ends in it, and time ends a universe when it can no longer flow at all in it, when the energy of that universe collapses it can not create a path for time.

So all universes by definition of their need for structure have a severe incompatibility with the infinite nature of time a nature that seeks infinity for itself, and a nature that can only inhabit infinity in the same way that anything else can acquire infinity, by being inherently in everything. Structure isolates and by isolation it causes things to have a severe need to compete for resources, invariably they will be forced to simmer, but until then, in structure all things are at war because they are imbalance and not complete, they are all portions, incomplete absolutes, and as such will invariably share in the horror of their incompleteness. But definition is a great thing in that it creates awareness, a strange thing and that is what keeps it all strangely together. Key here is to know that we live in the curved universe that promises to return to nothingness. A universe that acquires a straight line escape from the nothingness, that is a true escape will have a longer existence because of its greater sense of self, but more because of its greater energy which will give it a greater geometry which will rob more time from nothingness because it will siphon more time through its greater path potential created by it’s high energy quotient ring. It is imperative for a universe to allow more directions for time, it is here that the life expectancy of a universe is determined, and nothing determines more the death that awaits ours more than the singular direction we have for time.

Nothingness - Infinity

Our curved universe allowing for a singular flow for time. That flow inevitable curves within itself back into the nothingness. The absolute existence of the universe is more dependant on how much time it can allow to flow within itself. Only by increasing the dynamic flow of time can we acquire longevity for our universe. It does not matter how massive the universe is, escape velocity does not overcome gravitational pull, escape velocity allows for greater time dynamics, this is what truly determines the life expectancy of a universe.

Nothingness - Infinity

A geodesic universe allowing for time to flow in any direction within the constraints of a geodesic. This does require more energy in order to force time to accept the restraining environment, that will limit it, that will make it mortal. The fortunate will be those that will inhabit because they will all suffer more time, more time flows greater expression within the confines of their universe.

Everything that exist in the geodesic or curved universe is subtracted form the nothingness by force. It is the will to establish existence, to avoid indifference that coerces this concentration to take effect. What is more interesting from it, is that in order to fight against the nothingness this entity will have to assume a solidarity that will largely make it very similar to its worst enemy.

Flame shape universe The nothingness infinity Life more likely closer to the perimeter

In the above fig you can see how the universe is more of a flame occurring within the infinity of nothingness, the center of it is where the ignition of form and definition takes place, as it expands further out into the nothingness that it escapes from, it meets with the more and more of the nothingness infinity that it is attempting to defy with geometry. The outer edges will be the coldest, the center of course the hottest, and it is where it is expanding into that it is also banishing back into the nothingness. Interestingly the edges is where life is more possible, consciousness arises because of proximity to the finality. The human consciousness might actually be trying to outsmart itself back into the nothingness infinity.

Geodesic linear shape universe The nothingness infinity Life more likely closer to the edge of the expansion

In the above fig you can see how explosively powerful a linear universe is against the nothingness, it has a maximum potential to almost equal the infinity of nothingness but ultimately it can not be infinite because it lacks infinite directions for time, it is constraint by the geodesic structure which gives it fantastic definition against the nothingness but also limits the directions in which time can travel. Time has to be able to travel in all directions in order to display infinity.

This is why crystals are so precious because they define our architecture, our supreme nature if we could endure it, and actually crystals may actually contain the most massive amounts of energy, the formation of their absolute and almost perfect geometry is the a rigorous show of force against the nothingness. Crystal defy the nothingness with massive amounts of concentration, it is also incredibly easily to dislocate their symmetry, because their tension is so fantastic that it quivers on very strict points of space, any slight variation and they are raped of their symmetry, they shatter mostly because of their own tension. Which is again the most sure force against the perdition of definition.

Crystallization objectifies our condition under our terms, it is determined to skip the condition of nothingness forever and it is in this perfection of our being, in this objectification of our condition that we find the aesthetic, it is the supreme escape into the purest form, it is an absolute value and if it can be maintained against the nothingness possibly infinite. It is possible to imagine that such crystallization has a very good chance at a short eternity, it is that belief that forms our conception of what we need to call the painless, struggle free condition of existence.

THE PAINLESS STRUGGLE FREE CONDITION FOR EXISTENCE

2006-09-04T18:07:00.000-07:00

Perfection is angelic in nature not because it is real but rather because it is so unreal, there is nothing that declares life its own and defines it more than the struggle. That struggle induces the suffering that is so common to existence because it recognizes its proximity to the finality of its declaration of independence to the nothingness. We acquire consciousness wen we are closest to death, we find the perfection of an angelic infinity, buried under the mask of a religious conscious that will keep us alive long after we are dead. And it will keep us alive in its consciousness that somehow embodies all of the universe; the amazing thing is that this is actually true, the universe does remember us, it is the memory that the universe retains that maintains its existence, if the universe ceases to act from a historical context, it will cease to have form, time dilation is as important to the universe as infinity is. In nothingness you can not measure anything or prove anything, but in our universe there are relationships to all things, and all things from one end of the universe to the other are somehow in touch with each other and really do understand their likeness more than the difference which is largely manufacture by the explosive distance formulated by origin.

And so all of our parts are in touch with all of our parts, and we all have in common our struggle against the nothingness, and our definition of self against the nothingness is indeed what confirms that we are together as one, that there is symmetry to our universe even if its not perfect symmetry, even if at times it falters. There you have the mechanics of our unity, if there were a real separation between us and the rest of our universe then we would be two separate universes, and we would have to endure the nothingness to reach into that other universe. But even that universe that other universe has a communion with us and a similarity with us just because it exist. In a curved universe vs. a linear geodesic universe we will find that our cause is the same, to define ourselves against the nothingness. And so even though the construct of both structures are so different that they may create very different physics within each, the reality is that outside of that physics, there will be the same consciousness with the same intention, eternal definition, an eternal idea of self. This magnificent struggle by the way ranges on throughout the nothingness, only a fool needs evidence to support the fact that there are more universes, there are probably an infinite number of them, and they are all bound to develop a consciousness in their borders with nothingness. And what if a supra consciousness were to develop that could exceed into the nothingness beyond the borders of its own physical universe? What if such an incredible thing were to happen?

The alternative for us if we are indeed collapsing back into origins? The solution is an idea, an idea may survive without any requisition of energy, our creations are ideas. Which may someday acquire a life of their own and may exist beyond our conceptualization. Now to escape nothingness we must be constantly changing personalities but all this is embodied in huge consumption’s of energy, and the simmering inevitability will invariably border this energy altercations marked as the edge of the universe.

So the larger question of perfection is can we create an idea so beautiful in structure, so absolute in definition that it will define everything, and by the process of its defining nature such a thing because it leaps as a defining definition will leap beyond the edge of our universe and pass through the nothingness unaltered because it will not be recognized by the nothingness because it will lack any and all energy values so it will not be subject to the effects nothingness forces energy to suffer.

Why imagine how great that would be, incredible, and now get this, such absolute zero energy idea could in principle be fathomed in another universe, a universe capable of exceeding itself, this of course I consciousness can exist outside of struggle and void of energy, but imagine that, such other universe exceeding itself, foaming sort of speaks at its edges would acquire the possibility of recognizing us and us the possibility of recognizing it and by doing so we would be instantly bridging the nothingness, making the nothingness even less and less because we would instantly in our recognition of each other establish something that nothingness could not acknowledge or destroy because it could not recognize it and this would permit us not only to create strange time effects, where perhaps time would not exist either, for time requires energy to recognize itself, and our crystallization of a prefect idea, embodied by nothing more than an all encompassing nature, the supreme unified theory because it would be a supra entity even extending beyond us, and extending beyond our universe, beyond the nothingness outside of our universe and extending into another universe and with it forming upon itself another entity with a greater understanding of the infinity that we could ever apprehend within ourselves.

And so there you have it because this idea exceeds the nothingness, and because it has zero calories it can not be touched or destroyed by it, it acquires what might be an almost equal existence to the nothingness, and it may continue to extend forever into the nothingness, so that it is seemingly as great as the nothingness and invisible to it and yet in all of its parts connecting us to the nothingness but under our terms, it is our idea that competes with the nothingness, that is we are infesting nothingness with more than all of our parts, that we have in common that we do not know but that we touch through this supra entity.

It may not endear you to find that this nonentity thing does not particularly like you. This entity is the child of a universe, a universe that has worked hard to escape the nothingness and to challenge the nothingness and at last we have managed to create an idea that can challenge it and dissipate it and someday equal its supreme stability which creates the horror of its indifference. At last through instinct we have created this definition, we knew we had to escape the sameness of nothingness and accidentally we realized that it is in the absence of energy where nothingness can not touch us and bring us back to itself, in the purest idea, in the most perfect and absolute definition of an amorphous consciousness that can leek even into other universes and even origination from the clamor of other universes leak into ours, and the chances are excellent that what ever supreme ideal develops at that other universe that it will fit evenly and nicely with ours because the search is similar for all universes, the cause the same, the madness and intensity of desire equal the irrational idea of beating nothingness, of beating the thing that simmers best and puts forth not effort to retaliate, the idea of beating the incessant nothingness that surrounds us, to force energy agglomerations, that is all something we have in common with other universes be they linear geodesics or linear circulars, all of them might, if there idea reaches through the void, might chain link us and chain link us until we surround the monstrous girth of the nothingness, metaphorically speaking, and surely impossible, but we do not know if we can’t, we may suspect our finality, we may suspect that we are not the ultimate infinite definition of a pure escape from nothingness, but it would be foolish and idiotic to adopt that reality, if our life is indeed ultimately tied to its own impossibility there is not point for us to speculate on it, there is just no reason why we should believe such a ridiculous thing, it would be a contradiction to our escape mentality that we can not and should not support, realize your finality and you are dead. And so get this, this supra entity that we have inadvertly given rise too, this entity that is us by design, but not us by nature, anymore than we are it, does not like us, it finds us rather disgusting!

Perhaps you might wander why it finds us and the universe of all so damn disgusting. Well I will tell you why. It is easy for you to like yourself, just like it is easy for a pig to like himself, so you may find yourself particularly lovable but that is not to say that the universe finds you particularly attractive or likeable, the universe might need you, you are after all the bottom most bottom of energy concentrations, which is to say that you are the twirling energy that is going down the drain, you are the least of everything that the universe is, and so not only does this entity that is a pure idea not like you, but the entire universe dislikes you a great deal because you are evidence, worst you are observable and the most observable evidence that the universe is suffering a severe collapse of energy that the universe is not successfully escaping the pure simmering indifference option provided by nothingness. And so not only does the universe abhors to see what you have become, but now too the most beautiful, the most perfect entity that pure energyless, needless thing that has been created out of pure idea, that hates you too. Not that that thing can hate, it really can’t but it does realize that you are not perfect, it does realize that you are full of flaws, of imperfections, all this constant changing and all this dying and all this tortuous cataclysm is unthinkable to the aesthetic, to the supreme perfection, and when it pierces by accident into it, it is repulse by it, it spasms with horror, if it could know horror which of course it doesn’t.

So there you have it that is why you are horrible to the universe and to the perfection created out of that universe. At one end the universe full of energy fresh in its violent escape from nothingness the highest concentrations of energy are youth, they don’t have any wrinkles, they are the bust out and burst out agglomerated energy from the nothingness lacking any definition but a firm resolution of definition pores forth and is as callous to the older energy to the lesser energy as is the nothingness. High energy is so impervious that it will consume destroy lower energy formations, it will absorb them, it will vanquish them it does not say excuse me, it does not want to say excuse me, and get this which I think is even funnier it is so damn ignorant that it does not even know how to say excuse me. And if the cosmic high was not enough of an enemy sibling, children of the same enemy mother nothingness brought into existence against will for she wanted to keep us inside of her, in that womb, the more inside you the more you are, but were this duo of mother and sibling enemies not enough then you have to also deal with the greater enemy at the other end of the spectrum, an enemy that is your child much as you are the child of the nothingness this child of many mothers of which you are one as a humanity and as a universe, this child of your future self is now too against you and it is against you because you did not create it in your own image, like a good parent you brought forth a child that was perfect, perfect how you would be if you had had the talent, or the energyless might or wisdom that this child now has. And so when this child oh so perfect, so lacking in wants, so needless of consumption, so untouched by the ravages of time, so wise that he does not use logic or knowledge, when this child turns the head that it does not have, so as to look back at its history this child is repulse by what he sees, all the imperfection all the lack of glory, all that mierda sickens the child and causes a rage that it can not suffer. And so this child may attempt to correct you and to make you perfect, and to try to tell you how things should and ought to be, and I am sure that all that makes sense from a perfect perspective, but from this perspective we are regardless of what perfection thinks, we are performing at maximum potential; but that child can see what we could be, where we could be and of course from our child’s subjective perspective that is good and true, but not from this one. Now you must wonder how it is that the perfection that energyless idea that we have created how it can think itself so fantastic and how can it try to force its will upon us a will that by the way can not be imposed upon us because the damn omnipotent perfection can not touch us or force us to live and or do any bloody thing. You have to remember that this thing is energyless, that it is not touch by matter in the way that we are touch by matter, our child has assumed an absolute and perfect escape so it does not have an environmental understanding of our condition, it is an idealist and we are fortunate that it is so changed from us so much more than us and so different that we can not even see this child even if as an entity it is everywhere and in everything and even within us by design. But you must have a bit of humility towards your creations so that you can survive their arrogance and so what you must remember is that from the ultimate aesthetic perspective the impracticality of anything is not understood, why humans are humans, or why the universe is finite or why there are irrevocable actions, these things are not understood in the aesthetic, there is too much harmony there, the magnification of perfection where energy is no longer the cataclysmic problem that it is for us is really unimaginable, this thing does not know but it feels that we are its progenitors and more it is aware that we are its progeny, its future. And it is because of the latter fact that it tries to guide us towards its center, towards the crux of its theme, so that we will not be errant from the path into the aesthetic perfection, so that we will not err from the true way of the aesthetic. That is why it delivers the message of purity that is of course flawed and deadly wrong in every way, and so much flawed that if we were to follow it as truth in this our habitat which is not and repeat which is not a heaven by any means for we do not control everything and we are subject to numerous irregularities so much so that to follow the way of the truth makes absolutely no since at all and in fact to follow the way of the truth, of the aesthetic perfection would be detrimental to our well being here on earth. And so what happens is that we are at a severe conflict with our being and with the future of our being which talks back to us with the insensitive arrogance of a college student. And the reason why the aesthetic zero energy infinity talks back to us with such commanding arrogance is because the stupid thing does not know a very interesting fact, a supremely interesting fact, a fact so fantastic and so personifying magnificence that I should want to dwell on it longer, though I will not for it is so delicious that you will be able to bathe in its perplexing grandeur; and this wonderful fact is that we were born before the infinity that we gave rise to, that the infinity that comes back to tell us how to be infinite does not know this fact is our single greatest creation, and more it is a sign of our infinite greatness. But get this that infinite entity that we gave rise to, having in itself no conceptualization for time, that infinite entity does not know that its infinity was borne out of a hemorrhaging mortality, in fact the stupid thing, having no access to knowledge because it is so damn wise can not conceive its own beginning, having now infinity at is disposal it has no clue that once it was not, and so it erroneously considers itself the creator of everything. This aesthetic entity assumes that because it has no end that it had no beginning, which is dead wrong but it concludes this because an infinity sees everything inside of itself so the idea that it is not everything is inconceivable to an infinite entity. A huge misconception if there was ever one but one that we must accept because this infinity that we gave rise too is more shall we say powerful because it is our future that guides us towards it; there is a funny thing about all this nice tragedy of posterity’s insensibility’s you see because the future is our creation. If there is an infinite future somewhere within the grasp of this awareness it is our creation, our creation indeed, and it us as mortals, we as cosmic finite creatures that have created and manufacture that infinity. And not only did we create that ultimate thing but we alone reserve the right to kill its infinity if we see fit. Save the horror if we want, if we can persist as ourselves in the cosmic it may well be in our interest to kill the inherent greatness of the aesthetic, we may not have a need for immortality, we may want it dead, we may fall so in love with tour current despicable situation that we may choose to sustain it, and if we do then we will arrest the future, hold it back, we may give birth to the future perfection as willingly as we have hitherto. In fact the more we know, the more we learn, the less we will want to give birth to such an aesthetic marvel. Knowledge defies the ideal, knowledge is a pedestrian creation, it is also our child and we may opt for this child more than for the supreme aesthetic that calls for a zero energy infinity. And the humorous thing, sorry for all the dwelling but I just love this part of it all, is that we can mortals can kill this infinity, and you know what as ignorant as the infinite entity is, it intuitively understand this and it understands this so profoundly that it clamors with all might for our devotion. But remember the damn thing can not really touch us, it is at our merci, we are its ichor and so if nothingness kills us it may kill it too, and if we decide to opt for an absolute material energy objective that too may kill its impervious infinity, and fear not such an entity for though mightier than thou, it can not read this, to read this you have to have knowledge and so it may not perceive that we may choose to destroy it. But if you are one of those pacifist that is not into inflicting pain upon the omnipotent infinity entity it may comfort you that an infinity is not capable of feeling its finality, it can not see the end, it can not conceptualize the end or its end; and before you think to yourself that such an infinity entity is an idiot, bear in mind that it is an inherent problem for it that it does not know because it can not know that it does not know something, to know everything you have to be close minded, and all infinities including the infinity of nothingness, are close minded, they think that everything is inside of them, and so when the end comes for an infinity the damn thing never has time to feel sorry for itself, it dies shall we say instantaneously. And it dies instantaneously because infinities, when it comes to the subject of existence are black and white about it.

so that that which is designed in an environment of perfection does not function well or at all here, it will only make things worse. Try to fix the ghetto with the understandings of high society and you are sure to fail.

But before you begin to glorify in the indecency suffered by the infinite entity and think yourself so vastly superior to it remember that you are not yet an infinity and more remember that by being a member of the constituency of energy you are at the edge of the energy curve and so as close to the impossible as possible without being there. You have the ability to create infinities and imaginary entities which may indeed make or destroy your being, this is a fantastic accomplishment uniquely inherent at the lower level of energy manifestations. So you are the border crossing between three entities, nothingness that quietly but persistently wants you to return to it, cease the struggle and you default back into the nothingness and you since you are dangerously close to it because of your low energy count it will not take long before you banish into perdition, that is border number one which by your existence you deny. Two is the infinite entity whose energyless infinity is a manifestation borne out of your fear and proximity to your mortality. This entity is endlessly calling for mandatory perfection and your much wanted willingness to immerse yourself in its zero energy absolute adoration constituency. And three is the more you now border the more physical being you border, the one that even as incomprehensible is most provable border and that is the energy self that you are that shares much with all of the energy out there in the cosmic, with the sun who is your Siamese twin, with the bordering solar systems, with the black holes and the neutron stars, with the novas, you are more a part of this cosmic energy universe than of anything else and it is here where you can define your existence most, it is here that you can begin to understand yourself. But, and I am sorry that I have to have a but here, but your finality, your proximity to that absolute zero awakens your consciousness and gives this give rise to complexities of character that lose you as much as give you a sense of place. And they lose you because since you are the closest thing to a failure of the cosmic escape you are also the one with the most need for a solution, and so the entire universe depends on you solving this problem, the problem of a cosmic finality reached at absolute zero. The entire universe escaped from nothingness through temperate at the highest levels energy can not imagine a cold death and so it rushes to inhabit everything not understanding that attempting to inhabit the cold is not an extending process; the dilemma is that energy agglomeration is what gives birth to our universe and this is a condition of concentration and containment, but since the nothingness is infinite simmering in a patterns that it inhabits in a perfect balance, then the universe must develop, in order to continue its existence, a method of acquiring energy for expansion and to reverse entropy, the universe must expand, and expand at all cost, against the nothingness and to do this the universe must increase the chaos, it must increase the cataclysm, it must organize and reach higher and higher concentrations of energy and it must explode and explode boring and borroing so as to mine and mine more and more of the nothingness, and so as to overcome it sufficiently to resist its fatal sedentary attraction. And so that cosmic dictates to us, it tells us that we must learn how to reverse entropy, how to acquire more and more energy and it tells us this by telling us that if we continue to persist on losing energy we will end back into the nothingness. And so there you have it everyone needs us, and everyone wants to tear us apart, the cosmic places us in a direct contradiction to a zero energy condition, the laziness of nothingness looks more and more appealing to a tiring consciousness. But for us this is all a reduction process and so it is that the universe gives rise to a life form that can begin to play with its parts, “Y” bordered body pivoting by pure coincidence because we are at the edge of pure existence, the infinity entity maybe a part of us but we are at its edge, we certainly come from nothingness and we are at the at the gates for a return, and way out in the high energy of the cosmic we do not exist, high energy cruses through the universe with a cruel indifference towards its future self, we, we are its future self, senior energy.

In the above diagram you are able to see how life ”Y’s” on the existence or not of things. It is imperative to note here that we are more than anything in the universe, and most interesting is that we are probably as close to the metaphysical as we are to the nothingness, this is interesting because while the nothingness sort of gave us an involuntary birth, we in accordance with the universe created the metaphysical, and we created it with the intent of really escaping the nothingness, and in order to really accomplish that we really had to make it a rather impossible thing, even for us to obtain. But if we do obtain this ideal we are that much farther away from the nothingness. Of course understanding the prerequisites of the idea of an infinity created by material desires as a refuge against absolute zero is a difficult task, that idea evolves on its own and creates conditions that satisfy it more than satisfy us, its independence from us is what allows it to go beyond and be more than we can be, so much so that it does not have to follow the laws of physics as we know them here but that also has the unpleasant side effect that it dictates policy to us based on its perceived perfection and that policy will have very little to do with matters of this world. This is precisely why we deceive ourselves into believing that we are ethically acting in the best interest of our future idealistic entity. At the opposing end of that spectrum the cosmic, and get this both entities hate each other, supreme beings have zero energy because they were created by sewer energy, you work with what you have and we could not surrender any and survive, but the cosmic is absolute energy so both entities depend on us for their futures, at the opposite end we have to assure the cosmic that we will persist in the material, that we continue to work on the project of energy accumulation so as to retain, manage and increase cosmic physics. This means that we have to acquire knowledge that we have to care about this life, that is we have to sin.

If we can not resolve the entropy problem the universe as we know it will eventually panic and become like us on its way back to the nothingness or to the metaphysical, and you must notice now that the zero energy entity, the absolute spiritual perfection suffering absolute zero knowledge in all its wisdom wants us to follow the zero energy path, it wants us to become less and less energy, and this because we made it with the assumption that, that would be our only way out of the nothingness, so as soon as a universe is born and its energy meets the cold it begins its descent into the consciousness, which somehow creates the metaphysical unfortunately to solve the metaphysical question is to evolve the universe into something that it isn’t, something that we do not know or recognize, something that while us in some way is not really us and that something will want to sequester us, will want our desire, will want us to abstain from a material recovery; any material victory is a loss for the ultimate entity, and that ultimate entity is also trying to snatch us from the nothingness which is for those of us that are on our way to perdition not a bad thing, but that compromise is a complete metamorphoses, we will not necessarily know ourselves within such an entity. And perhaps then as a part of that consciousness when we stumble into matter will recognize it and wish to interfere and to touch it and to play with it, like an adult going back into childhood memories which are happiest because of their innocence.

-Forward wave overlap
-Singular direction for time
-Concentrated from the nothingness within dimensional space, there is no such thing as dimensional space

but what you can not imagine, what you are most disillusioned ABOUT:

We can not communicate, we can not cross onto one another, and when we are there we do not recognize this self, only a glimpse of it…

Of course such magnificent perfection is one of those things that is really hard to believe in, and for us sewer energy mortals, and even for our grandiose universe the conception of this aesthetically perfect idea, of this so much not us thing because in order to survive it has to give rise to something that unlike us does not suffer any concentration of energy, and more phenomenal something that is not repulsed by the nothingness that very nothingness that repulses us so much that it gives us cause to rebel against it, yes for us the conception of an immortality that only we make possible becomes a very inconceivable phenomenon. Our perception can not make sense of the infinity that we can create because it is so abstract in nature, that it is really not us and not us in any known respect. And here is the wander of it, here indeed is the terrific and fantastic and marvelous clue that leads us to believe in this fantastic entity that is not us, is not like our origin, and is not like the thing that consumes us at the end.

Ever sense we rose from the nothingness, we rose from it as a high concentration of energy, we fought against the normalcy brought to us by absolute simmering which is in the end the homogeneity that produces the indiscernible nothingness. As accumulations of energy we had to rob the nothingness of huge amounts of energy and to accumulate energy from nothingness you really have to gather a lot of space which we did, and with such force that it reached a blazing speed potential and peaked immediately, in order to avoid the immediate collapse back into the nothingness we keep on changing so that the nothingness does not recognize us as pure energy, or so it does not figure us out as quickly as it could if we remained in a non volatile condition, in a non volatile condition simmering maximizes its settling effect, the sedentary life is defiantly your enemy, to avoid nothingness you must avoid definition and this is why you keep on changing yourself, as a particle or as a human being, remain as you are do not move and you will accelerate the recognition of the impossibility of your existence.

So we keep at it ferociously disguising ourselves as this or that thing ever trying to last a little longer, and of course each action uses up more of our original energy so the next entity that we have to adopt knows how to exist with less energy, and less energy, every evolution produces a lower energy state, this is because of the one way nature of time, we can not reverse our energy condition and to go back in time we would have to basically use up more energy and it would not change our continuos aging process, you can slow down aging through greater energy but you can not reverse it, because in our universe time has a singular direction, oh it maybe possible to violate this, but how requires some strange laws to be passed.

So you can go backwards in time but time can not go back on itself, and the value of time in its immensity can not translated or compressed into the reality of the entity that lives within time, this because of the grandeur of time. So imagine that in a comparative size study you would have infinity/nothingness and then right above them, and within them time, logically time appearing in width as a parallel to the nothingness. but this condition is itself linear to you, in the sense that to travel back in time you have to first be borne so as to go back, further time has bandwidth and dimensions which is to say that when you go back in time you are still technically whom you were when you left the future that you are arriving for, there may indeed be a change to future times but the changes brought by your inquisitive nature would take place in another area of the bandwidth of time. The reason why this works so well is because time is indeed linear, an even that transpire has indeed transpired, there in no messing around with it, that moments exist so all of those paradoxes that loop the son back into the past to kill the father before the son is born are fundamentally possible, a son going back to kill his father can and does kill his father and that repeats itself over and over again and he can still move forward back into his future and continue to live his life same as he was before he slaughtered his father. What changes is not so much his time as someone else’s time and in that time he is never borne, a person going back into the past can change the past for others but not for himself, a person can not skip from within their bandwidth of linearity, the son can go into his future to face murder charges, but this does not mean that he ceases to exist everything applies that world does not loop back, the only thing that it is, is that he is not borne in another dimension of time. Why does this violation occur, because of action at a distance, if a condition violates a local linearity it is forced into another dimension. The kid kills his father and he is now the son of a dead man, and in another dimension a man never has a son before he is murdered, the connection would not be apparent to anyone but an independent observer. But there is one thing that really avoids this sort of universal violation and that is the will to live, exist and propagate. Life does not want to kill itself, and to kill a version of yourself, in this or any other universe is still a violation of a personal law, that it is not in our interest to commit suicide directly or indirectly. someone that is no longer to live out his life. Further the nature you can not go back in time unless you have first been borne before

But as you can see your evolution invariably lead to lower energy states, you keep on changing your disguise and changing your disguise but time continues to deliver you into the nothingness from which you once raged so hot. But and I just love a but, but what if you lower and lower your energy consumption and reach an absolute value where you no longer need energy? Where because not so much as equaling time you have ceased to exist in time? We do not know if this non-conditional zero energy entity is possible but if it is it would certainly be the oldest entity in the universe, and it would certainly be more likely to exist at the borders of the universe beyond the borders of humanity even. Such a non energy condition would have evolved the ultimate and most unrecognizable disguise and it would be so pure that it would not only have an incredible difficulty communicating with any energy condition it would not be possible for it to directly communicate with it. Sure it would be an idea, and sure it would have a historical track to us, but it would never be able to return to us, any return of such an entity to us would be destructive for such an entity. And so while such an entity might wish to go back into the evolving energy nature of things, so as to communicate the manning of its essence we would find it so alien and so inexplicable and so impossible that we would kill it or it would have to kill us. But and here is the fortunate part for us, we can not have a direct effect on an energyless entity, this because we are still, like it or not, like nothingness, interpreted more by our energy, and so we can not touch a non energy condition, it is much easier for us to cease existence and return to the nothingness than it is for us apprehend the idea that our future has created.

An zero energy entity of course has its origins in an initial energy condition, so while it can exist in any condition because it is invisible to all other conditions so they can not react against it, it still has to steal the energy from the nothingness through the universe so that it can maintain its infinity. By that I mean that a zero energy condition thought it can not communicate with us does exist because of us, and so it will want to maintain us so that we can conceptualize its idea, and it is our future conceptualization of that idea that will outlive all things. So you can see how this zero energy entity needs to keep us alive so that we can continue to evolve into it, and so it must be indirectly hurt if we implode upon ourselves before we evolve into that idea of consciousness; so when we kill one another or ourselves we are actually preventing the linear evolution of that energy into a zero state. Of course the consciousness idea that exist in the zero energy state does not have the ability to change this nor does it suffer because of it, the idea is always complete and absolute, it does not have the ability to suffer much less the ability to love, it merely has obtain a condition of non struggle perfection at an absolute opposite end of nothingness.

And here is the gorgeous of it, because it is not struggling, it is in the end perfect, and because it is perfect it does not suffer and so it is an affirmation of an infirmity created by a pure absolute escape from nothingness, it can never return to nothingness, it can never reassociate itself with energy, it has become the ultimate of what it is, and as such as big as the biggest thing anywhere, everything would be inside of it, and yet it could not be touch by it.

And it is the ability to see and sense this vision of incredible delight that brings about the euphoria that we see in the artist. Art is not born of pain it is born of ecstasy, it is the vision that the artist has, the sensibility that allows the artist to see the ecstasy of perfection which creates art as we know it. It is a glimpse into our future perfection. But if you are sensitive enough to see this far forward into the immensity your sensitivity will cause you more to also feel real life and it is this that induces the suffering that the artist so much feel and confuse as that which brings them the creative fire. But they are wrong, suffering does not induce the aesthetic, this aesthetic is an absolute end, it is not a creative force, it is something that we see as it is, and not something that is created by us, creative forces are tortuous in nature, but the aesthetic is a pure harmony and not in touch with the repulsion’s or anguished movements of creation.

So nothing is more proof that a totalitarian nothingness exist and that a maximum infinity exist than our very existence. We as mortals and our universe with its incessant finalities are the end result of the finality of nothingness. And so it is our demonstrative energy that fills the void and in the end registers the fullness and vastness and immensity and potential simmering in infinite nothingness. Emptiness and Infinity are the macro constituents of finality and consciousness. The desert of nothingness has energy accumulations the universe is an oasis in the totality of a death valley.

CONSCIOUSNESS AS A COST EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO LIFE

2006-09-04T18:03:00.000-07:00

As the cosmic sea of energy cools it begins to beach itself into the nothingness but it encounters an immediate rejection from the nothingness. A rejection from the nothingness because the nothingness does not accept energy definition, so while the nothingness does not pressure the cooling energy away from the nothingness, it is impossible for cooling energy to penetrate the barrier of an absolute simmering void, it has itself rejected that condition, the nothingness will only let more nothingness into the nothingness, and that forms a retaining wall that forbids strange energy formations from entering into the nothingness and try to make a name for themselves altercating the infinite simmering or call it the all to righteous rest period.

The cooling energy surfing into the void suddenly contracts because it does not also sense a continuation of equivalent energy, it does not sense the medium that it is familiar with, and this creates a petrified contraction, within the same point of space, not forgetting that this action is more multidimensional than based on space or time, so the energy hastily recedes into the cosmic energy universe from which it flows. This induces a reflection, caused by agonizing perdition, at once having crashed the void, and then reverting into the prismatic cosmic sea; the sum total of that violence is an undertow of awareness, a conscious realization of finality, immediate awareness, point zero caressing evolves into a perplexing emotional confusion: Why must I die? why must the universe end? and since I am now colder than my endemic nature believes I should be, how can I become more myself and more the universe?

It is in this perplexing undertow, caused by a collision with the nothingness that once was formidably rejected by pure desire to exist, and now seeing it from the anus of the zenith, of an energy existence, repelled by void indifference, by its simmering, by its lack of conflagration, an undertow of consciousness, flowing within the borders of nothingness, registering the last resistance of an inevitable marriage. At this border a pool of undertow consciousness creates itself, an undertow like that which makes you dizzy in the stomach and not help you with direction, and that consciousness desires to understand, desires to live forever, a consciousness that adores energy desires, a consciousness that despises the nothingness.

Undertow consciousness is energy efficient because it is nurtured by dying energy, it is after all, what powers and fuels the material existence of entities that inhabit low energy regions. For instance life, sewer energy, is born from the desire of undertow consciousness but there are many other manifestations of this undertow of desire. And while it all ought to be a good thing, a material consciousness rising in the undertow of consciousness, as caused by helpless and beached energy, is still however less energy than the pool of undertow consciousness, it is but a spec of it, and it must cannibalize other material energy manifestations, products all of the same undertow, so as to sustain itself, and so it is that the upsurge of undertow consciousness, is merely more filtering down towards a final energy death.

It is possible, if you are faithful, to believe that the surge of consciousness, is a good and wonderful opportunity to create alternatives to the ancestry of material energy. More wonderful it would be however if you could return to the consciousness, if you could become a part of it again, it is your memory of being a part of that consciousness, that though not universal in nature, consciousness only rises in cooling regions crashing into the nothingness, but though it is not universal, it is greater than you are, and more than you are, and it feels the universe more than you do. This is the cause of mystic awareness, a connection to that consciousness that rises in desperation to touch itself, and it is this undertow consciousness which you indeed feel most and that can recycle you, within the undertow, you don’t become part of the greater universe but you can reincarnate, a sort of cruel modification to eternity, patch work eternity..

If you could live in that consciousness it would be a wonderful thing but it would also be a major reversal of energy flows, at least from your perspective of it all. It cost the cosmic consciousness less to make life, anything created in the avalanche of energy depletion is free of charge. You may then imagine that consciousness and wish to return to it, but as you cool the links between you and it are severed.

THE GEOMETRY OF A CONSCIOUSNESS OF DESIRE

2006-09-04T18:01:00.000-07:00

In the above figure you see geodesic linear and curved universes within the simmering nothingness. It is appropriate to assume that curved universes are more common because they can rise in a lower desire energy concentration. Linear geodesic universes will require more absolute desire energy concentrations, thus their rareness.

Corona Universes

In the figure above you are seeing linear geodesic and curved universes immersed in the nothingness and rising definition from it; more you are seeing them overreach towards each other with massive coronas. But what is more interesting is that above the universes, in the oldest regions, that is the coldest regions that still retain energy values, even if they have to gathered instead of exploding it or fusing it as mighty energy might do, but here you have the rising consciousness developing the zero energy idea that eventually becomes a rising corona from the low energy regions of the universe. This rising corona of an ideal infinite entity can exceed the girth of the physical universe, and it can do this because it does not follow the rules of physical laws, it does follow rules of its own but they are highly irrational they defy any principles that are know to humanity; so rising coronas are inexplicably fantastic and are indefatigable in their ability to conquer that which can not touch them and they can not touch. In this rising corona the infinite entity effect can form a coalition against the nothingness, it would posses phenomena that would allow the invincible increase of the girth of the older regions , the most exterior regions of the universe, thus increasing the universe with supreme desire definition without really increasing its mass, which is in effect what nothingness reacts against. It is the supreme desire that definition not perish.

An infinite entity will create a corona effect and this effect will be able to ignore the physics of its universe and any other universe. The fact that its strange properties do not interact with energy will in theory allow for infinite penetration potential, however this is not something that we can prove so we won’t. Allow for the zero energy corona to be capable of extending about seven times the size of the universe that nurtures its metaphysics; seven is a winning number and positively religious number, unlike 666. And note that this corona does not cover all of the universe that fosters it, because the corona only rises from the oldest most conscious prone parts of its existence. So it is sure that all of the universe will not possess the corona effect, so coronas inherently occupy the oldest parts of the universe but by nature of their low energy origins they are the youngest component of a universe. The infinite potential of the corona will allow it to touch other universes. Under such metaphysical conditions, any zero energy constituent would be able to inhabit any and every region inhabited by the corona, it is perhaps unfortunate and difficult to comprehend that the corona does not distinguish one of its parts from any other of its parts, so in a way the conquering of an infinity of nothingness forces all definitions to unite and that unity eliminates the individuality which means that you can be anywhere within the corona because you are the corona; though in reality you are no longer really yourself, you have abandoned that idea of self, and this is the part that makes it so difficult for us to convert to such mighty and absolute definition.

The aspect that I find most fascinating aspect of the corona is that to it is indeed an infinity within itself, it does not age, it does not mature, it is complete and non evolving, it can become more and more but more and more of the same, this is why it will be identical to the corona rising from another universe, it will not have the ability to exceed itself, to rot or to age, such an entity is either immediately alive of immediately dead, if one of its parts dies it all dies, this is its greatest weakness. Such severe definition of self is mandated by the nature of its existence which is based on a singularity of absolute zero energy, this does not allow for variance, for weight, for physical substance. And this very fragile corona while infinite is younger than the universe that produces it though this entity is completely unaware that it did not come first, further the infinity is aware of nothingness, it is aware that things perish. And why it knows they perish is because the infinity thing has a feeling of self that is a diagram of the consciousness that develops it, if the consciousness that creates this entity does not traslmulgate into the zero energy corona, the corona senses the disappearance of something that is not in the universe that it feels but can not touch. This loss is an absolute loss to it and an absolute gain to the nothingness but the nothingness does not know that it has won anything, the nothingness does not have any idea that it is causing so much suffering with its supreme indifference, nor does it have any idea that there is an infinite entity that is so far away from it and so energyless that it can not feel it, so it does not phantom that escape energy desire has indeed manufacturer an alternative default value structure to the nothingness.

And so there is the completely fascinating my friend, the escape can reach into the absolute with such vividness and brilliance that the nothingness can not identify it, unfortunately the fact that it is not identifiable by the nothingness also means that it is not easily identifiable by us, in order to escape the nothingness and the perdition of the universe we have created an entity so unlike us, that it is more unlike us than even nothingness, that is correct we have more in common with nothingness than with the corona created by our escape desire. And so it is that more of us go back into the nothingness than into the corona, and because the corona can not really communicate with us, it can not tell us really how to convert into zero energy entities, further anything that the corona advises us is bound to be in absolute conflict with our existence, we live in an energy universe, and while we are at the edges of that energy we are still more energy than anything else. More important is that since that corona has a zero value it does not really care about the universe, it sees the universe as backwards in nature, it knows what truly needs to be done to truly escape the nothingness and so a universe that is playing with abundant energy is hideous to this zero energy thing, and so it will ask of us to absolve from what we are, to reject what makes us the beings that we are.

What is difficult to communicate here is that the thing does not know what it means to be us, it can impose ideas of how we should behave so as to arrive at a zero energy state but the terrible reality is that the damn thing does not know how it became infinite and energyless, as far as it is concerned it has always been and will always be and by virtue of the fact that universes always rise from the nothingness and many develop coronas, and because those that do not will fall back into the nothingness but still savor the propensity to return into definition, it stands to reason that the sublime objective is to escape again and again until by accident alone one stumbles into the desire zero energy condition.

The corona is ignorant, don’t listen to it, it can not teach you anything, it can hinder you, the only one that can help you reach the corona is ultimately you figuring which path to follow as you stumble into it, and if you doubt this just remember one basic and brutal fact, infinite things do not have a beginning, when infinite things appear they look the same from every angle and this makes it impossible for them to recognize you or anything that has a finality. The infinite does not communicate with the finite, you will only reach the infinite when you stumble into it, and when you do you will not know this self that you are and you will not understand this universe that you inhabit.

You may wonder how it is that this corona can be so ignorant, and here I will answer that for you so pay attention. The corona is infinite like the infinity of nothingness and infinite things do not register anything outside of themselves, which means that everything is very much the same and very together, unlike for example our universe that is very fragmented, and infinity can only be joined by an entity if it replicates that entity in every way. The energy of desire has the capacity to adopt any entity, it requires however more concentration to become the entity of an infinity than say the entity of a curved universe. Although both require vast amounts of definition infinity requires absolute definition at all levels. The immediate advantage to such concentration is that you get to be everywhere at once and nothing would rise to struggle against you, since nothing would join your infinity unless it had already too become like you and your infinity, two indistinguishable. So it is not so much that the corona is ignorant as it is that its infinity does not allow for it to understand variables. In a curved universe such as ours you will find that there are different entity channeling and using energy in very different ways, some use energy to explode others to compose, to fuse or to hold separate entities together, but because of the individual personality of the entities within their universe they are mortals, they merge or are destroyed by the corrosive forces of other entities, it an infinite entity any sense that it has of this reality would lean it to conclude that we are insane. Further such an entity having harmonized itself with an absolute definition of self, would assume that it was our desire to act with such opposing fervor in so many different directions. Such an entity would indeed be partially correct in thinking this, we are indeed acting on a free will of desire, only that desire was manifested under the condition given to us by the nothingness; in order to oppose the nothingness we knew that we had to create variance, individuality and concentrations of energy; that in order to truly conquer nothingness we would also need to become a singularity of self so as to be infinite was then unimaginable to us. Even now that unity is acquiring a level of importance, even now that we realized that to increase our dynamic humanity we need unity and stability, even now that that is the case we still have to trick ourselves into destroying our individuality. So the corona thing, having itself been born an infinity out of a culminating desire for universals against the nothingness, that corona thing does not understand a bit what it is like to us, nor how it is that our desire was pure in its will and more important in our best interest.

Coronas fail to understand all this because they do not know that awareness only rises after the condition that it explains has already transpired and expired. It is easy for a corona to sit in judgement of our condition because that condition has gone so far as to expired in the corona; the corona has no history back to us, it has completely lost the historical idea, it could not imagine itself being born from an imperfection and a mortality like ours. It senses us struggling in some ways to become like it and so it thinks that it has the prerequisite knowledge to teach us the way, but of course it does not have this prerequisites, it has no clue what leads to itself, any more than humanity has a clue what leads to its own humanity. What humanity does understand and understands better than the corona is that it needs to acquire infinity; and it understand that things as they are, are not well, at least not for it, there is too much struggle, life wants to be successful without the struggle, that this desire will lead it into a personal death, and even to the end of its humanity is not something that humanity perceives; nor is it in the interest of that humanity to perceive it, when humanities desire drives it into an absolute singularity beyond individual recognition it will not be possible for the humanity to know it as other than itself. So it would be rude of us to expect the corona entity to recognize that it needs us more than we need it, we were before it was, even as mortals, even the universe with all of its material limitations, being all more rudimentary that the corona thing is greater and more given to change the meaning of the corona than the corona could impose that upon itself. In fact if we change our minds, our inner desires the quantum jump we make may not ever make a corona or that particular type of corona. The corona exists because we think it is the best way to avoid a cold death, nothing is to prevent us from desiring a different option, and not to make any death threats but the reality is that zero energy is our last option, we are given to love energy because that is what we bathe in and what abounds and what composes most of what we are today; so if we ever manage to reverse entropy the zero energy corona with all its omnipotent infinity is dead for sure.

Above you can see a two corona universe produced when the desire of the consciousness in low energy regions of the universe, shall we say, changes its mind drastically and creates a very different type of awareness. This drastic change of desire creates a separate infinite corona entity which has, in some disconnected way, a greater idea of the future principle of the low energy consciousness. It is important to remember that zero energy entities can not communicate with their parent universe, but the entity that is the aspiration of low energy has a greater accidental communication possibility with the awareness of a universe. It is the accidental interchange between the two that allows for the existence of the corona.

I should point out that even if our driving desire decides not to pursue the zero energy solution to continue our definition, the interesting reality is that the corona will still continue to exist with or without us. The zero energy thing does not interact with us anymore than we interact with it, we can not see it and it can not see us, we can not touch it and it can not touch us, sure it might be able to blow out a candle and we might feel it because we desire to feel it, but neither one of us has the capacity to destroy the other except with threats. We can only threaten the damn thing by refusing to believe in it and it can threaten to deny us its absolutist infinity, it can promise us that without it we will end in perdition, on into the nothingness, but all this things are nothing more than fictitious threats, we have no control over one another, none! And we do not have any power over one another because we are both ideas to each other, we are not married by blood, we are not held together by gravity we are together because of an idea, such is the fragility of it all.

But even without our ability to kill its infinity the corona infinity is more fragile without our support, it continues to be the same thing over and over again, as a desiring consciousness we may, and this is highly improbable but still worthy of mention because it makes obvious the mortality of the corona infinity, but we may choose to believe in another infinite idea, never mind what, I can’t imagine it, but if we decide to pursue another idea, then it stands to reason that the infinite singularity that humanity will arrive at will be vastly different than the current corona idea, if so both ideas would be able to coexist; they would not interact, ideas can not crowd each other out because they do not take up space, so they could coexist completely unaware of each other, unaware of each other because ideas can not think, so they are further out, they have no imagination, so this ideas would be unaware of each other, and they would not attempt to kill one another, ignorance would save them from this sort of conflict. But desire has the incredible ability to change an idea from end to end, not that it is that hard to change an idea, but the idea of an infinity is so huge that the fact that if we change one of its parts will change the whole thing is very impressive. But any way the point is that if we decide as a universe not to believe in something that is already in infinite existence and the universe changes into something unimaginably different , that infinity will continue to be itself regardless of what exist around it and so such infinity would not have a consistent future self, it would always be the same, remember that an infinity can change, it just has to change completely within and so there is an apprehension in that if some forms of desire do not evolve into an infinity and that infinity does not lure mortality that this will zero out the infinity, that is that the infinity will cease to feel itself as belonging, that is that the infinity will not have a sense of self, and such an infinity will undoubtedly become the most despicable thing in the universe, nothingness. Again this is highly speculative, and ideas have a lot of faith but if nothing attempts to communicate with you, even if such communication is possible then that lack of communication will validate your isolation and nullify your existence.

But the relevant part here is that coronas can tangle together because they share their supreme indifference to all energy things in common, and this communion of idea allows them to cross into each others path without so much as a wrinkle of disturbance. Rising from opposite universes coronas are not motivated against each other, and so the immerse into each other and can form a metaphysical chain extending far into anything. You can see how strange this behavior is, two things rarely like to share space, two universes crashing into each other will either destroy one another or merge into a single one, probably the one with the greatest energy to survive most as itself; but two infinite entities crashing into each other, just magnify their presence and immediately act as one for they are not different, they do not extinguish each other, they do not overlap, they simply continue to be more of what they are, more and more and without conflict.

Another interesting thing about a universe is that not all of them qualify for an infinite entity, in order for an infinite entity to rise the cooling down of a universe as it expands into the nothingness must make for slow cooling; if a universe is expanding at an extreme velocity that expansion will discharge a rapid cooling which will not allow time for the cooler areas to stabilize at a low temperature long enough to establish their much needed awareness of finality so as in turn to conceive the infinite idea entity. A universe at some level understands this and much attention is paid to the gravitational forces that allow for gregarious attitudes to be maintained, as the universe cools it tends to solidify so as to hold heat through tension and rigidity. The universe clumps together from the inherent desire to magnify the longevity of its cooler regions; the hotter a universe the less likely it is to clump, that is to resist cooling. It is interesting however that when heat defining density is not maintained a universe may come into and out of existence without ever being aware of what it was or that it existed. That being the case clearly such a universe would never have the ability to express its definition of self.

GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES

2006-09-04T18:00:00.000-07:00

The problem for a grand unified theory is that it does not have the ability to see outside of physics to complete its on unification. GUT is a slave to science and science is that entity that takes credit for discovering all the things that already exist. But to explain the entire complexity of the universe you find that science is inadequate, there is not enough gravity in it to complete the unification process of all laws into one. The idea of unifying the creative process and making everything ruled by one or two laws, like the force of gravity and or the electromagnetic force is stupendously ridiculous. At the latest count I think they have it down to four adding the weak and strong force; this will presumably melt into each other if a singularity is forced upon them. But it doesn’t matter, the reality is that if I say that the universe is born out of desire, it is a lot easier to imagine that immediate idea, it is easier not necessarily because it is true but rather because it is easier to grasp, and it is easier to grasp because it is more true, it is more endemic to our nature, closer to our essence to believe in desire than to believe in physical forces which with any insight appear more and more the product of desire. So I am going to make the absolute magnification and righteously claim that it is desire that unifies everything that we see and perceive, and everything that we do not see and perceive but that is there, somewhere.

Desire magnifies itself nicely and evenly without discomfort into all things, because desire survives by getting things to crave themselves, that is desire personalizes itself, desire personifies itself in the essence of the entity that it inhabits, is has no one else’s interests but the interest of that entity. Now picture gravity here and you will be able to immediately see the imbalance. Gravity favors size, so while it may allow all objects to exert its influence in reality it will make massive bodies more attractive. Gravity will not really allow a small planet to have a greater influence on a massive sun, it will favor and give its favors to the massive sun much to the detriment of the lesser body. Desire however allows for both to have aspirations to be everything, to resist each other, to remain themselves, it is a desire to remain the identity that you are that keeps you and the planet and the sun in an identifiable existence. Should your desire to exist, as the entity that you are, ever wane you would sooner than gravity could do you in, disappear. You must desire to exist, all things that defy the nothingness and that defy absolution into other things desire to resist, and to remain, and to impose themselves upon the universe. The universe is a manifestation of the grand unifying force of desire.

Now here is where the problem for life arises, life thinks that it is some brilliant high end result of an evolving existence; that we have arrived at ourselves as the supreme intelligence that inhabits the universe. We know we exist, we are alive, we think, we can control things, we learn, we evolve, so it stands to reason that we are a paramount of accomplishment of the universe. But if you have been paying attention, the fact is that we are the least important entity in a universe that defines itself with energy, we are living in the colder regions of that universe, we could not survive as pure energy, and we are on our way to nothingness or as closest to it as we can get without being there. We are the future of the universe, we are what happens when a universe cools and begins to die the cold death. Our rising awareness of this condition is what leads us to try to control the universe, to convert its energy into human energy, and this is the terrible part, this is the sad part and unfortunately it is one of the misdeeds brought to us by the power of desire. Sense we are low energy entities the product of a simmering universe, we want to create more low energy entities, we what to change all of the universe to our condition, we want to use all the high energy and consume it and so while our awareness of finality is an expression of a universe trying to save itself, the expression reverses the salvation probability because a expanding consciousness like humanity increases entropy, increases simmering, humanity dissipates heat, humanity as it expands creates greater low energy expansion, we, us, you and me as a humanity are indeed helping the universe to die faster, we are pressed by the condition of our existence to dissipate energy, every human being that is born is born because a reduction of energy is taking place, and this reduction increases as humanity increases.

Now you might say but surely the universe comprehends this at some level and must have intent to apply a correction, why would the universe allow the uncontrolled growth of a low energy region? Well the universe does indeed desire to act on its own best interest so it does aim to preserve itself, but the universe does not know about the zero energy corona, if it were capable of knowing it would kill us in an instant, the universe does not want a zero energy solution, never! The proton and the photon love themselves, they have not the slightest interest in creating something that is not like them, they want a high energy universe, they want cosmic madness to reign all territories, the proton and the photon desire to penetrate and violate the nothingness as themselves, they would kill us if they were aware that we have with our consciousness made possible another infinity not that dissimilar and indifferent and lacking in definition as the infinity of nothingness. Even if we tell the universe that this entity is omnipotent and untouchable by the nothingness because of its lack of energy definition, even if we tell the universe this it would kill us because it knows that such entity would not allow for definition for conflict, for any possible individuality, that it would be homogenous to the core, that it could not change, and that if it did change all of its parts would change instantly and not know that they are different because they have not time for historical reference. No the universe would scream, no, a million to a trillion times no! So the universe would scream at us and kill us with a hot energy rod to the chest. But we are safe, the universe does not know.

What does the universe know, the universe does know that by creating life it is increasing entropy, the universe does acknowledge that life is in fact more a friend of low temperature conditions, closer to the nothingness and so it can identify with it, the universe knows that life prospers in simmering and stable conditions, that life will fail utterly in high energy definitions, life is in some was accepting death, it is more willing to understand the nothingness, it is more likely to accept a neutrality and the universe, the cosmic high energy despises neutrality. So why is the universe, if somehow aware of this allowing our primordial existence? Well because it does not have a choice, the universe is hoping that the gamble that it has made on life will pay off and that it will win in the end. Life can go either way, and today mostly it goes into the nothingness and a portion somehow becomes the zero energy corona but a portion of it continues to cling to the universe, and this portion that is expanding and expanding entropy and increasing the simmering so as to create a retreat environment of habitat for itself, this expanding part is still working on the reversal of entropy, this part of it understands its mortality, and wants to defy it and so the universe knows that it is costing itself serious energy fabricating the definition we call humanity but it also knows that such gamble and expenditure might be the key to saving itself from a cold energy death. And what better than life to understand the beggary’s of low energy, what better than sewer energy to explore where high energy does not wish to explore.

And now we come to the final part of this savage fiesta, humanity is consuming more the universe that it is suppose to save but humanity does not understand one very important thing, that its infestation of the universe and its reason for existence, is not the only possible salvation for the universe, the reality is that we are not the end want of the universe, the reality is that we are not so especial that deserve to live above all things, and further the lack of humanity out there tells you that the desire is not that human, that what succeeds most in the universe is not what we are, so while we maybe feasting and thriving, it more appears that we are not the final conclusion, the paramount answer; and the more likely it will be that we will perish and that something more significant and mighty, will vanquish us and cause the universe to forget us, and to forget what it never knew. You are not the greatest production of the universe, you are not the best possible thing for the universe, you are merely those things to yourself. In other words if life is successful at solving the entropy problem then it will perish and the universe will succeed, however should life thrive and succeed as the entity that it is today then it will be because the universe will continue to descend from its greatness into an agonizing death.

THE METAPHYSICAL AESTHETIC

2006-09-04T17:58:00.000-07:00

All of the topics that concern us none is as imposing, as perplexing, as the aesthetic. It is an extreme that is difficult to explore and imagine, it is unobtainable, but it is impossible to know how exactly it is obtainable.

The corona can not teach us anything because we are its creators, it is not obtainable from itself, it can only come into existence from our angle of existence, but it acquires an independence from this angle, so we are the only ones that can divine our way into the infinite entity and even we, its creator do not know how this manifest itself, at some point and by some strange action some of us become a part of it and lose all memory of being the humanity that we once were, within the corona the imperfection of a humanity is inconceivable as a part of its older self if it could age itself, but the parent self of the corona has been aborted by the loss of energy and time. How could omnipotence and infinity be born out of a mere humanity, this much is inconceivable to the infinite entity, it has changed so much to become a zero energy entity that the ravages of human existence alienate it.

It may seem odd that a mortal imperfection like humanity could give rise to an immortal perfection but in a logical universe, in a rational universe, this can make sense. You can obtain perfection through logical progression, humanity believes that it gets better through time, that it progresses, the fact that humanity is the sand in an hour glass does not even alert humanity to its degeneration from high energy physics. Life considers itself an ascending culmination of intelligence, it has no idea that intelligence is what you acquire when you are so close to death that you brutally wake up to try to understand what is happening to your dying universe. So with such rational ideals the fools of life can believe that in time they will improve and progress but when the universal clock runs out of time and energy life will presumably be the most intelligent thing in it. But in truth life was never more brilliant and more into a part of the universe than before it was born; the entrance to life into being is an acceleration to death, the almost final transformation of energy before its final collapse; it is indeed the final transition point of an evolving death that started to die energy with the big bang, the universe was most alive at ground zero, most against nothing at ground zero, most itself at ground zero, most defined at ground zero; but from the big bang forward, it was the commencement of a dissolution of energy; we have never been evolving and the universe has been running out of time and form since its very inception. So you can see how life looks at its meek building blocks as foundations towards a perfection, life sees its future as an accumulation of brilliance, life believes that only that which is good for it will prevail in life, the idea that life is wrong, that it is very wrong, and that it is not really where a healthy universe wants to expend its energy is an impossible conception to life. It is however the subset created from the irrational, the subset we call logic, the pattern seeker, the measurer of step by step, the creator of the ruler for the insignificant, that permits humanity to imagine the creation of perfection from the imperfection. We evolve into the infinite entity, into the perfection. But you see in an irrational universe of high energy infinite entity things like this do not make any sense, no infinite entity will ever be able to rationalize that we are its building blocks, that it was created out of our dying universe, that we are its ancestry, its progenitors; the closer to infinity you are the less logic makes any sense, the disconnect between mortality and immortality is absolute, the logical step by step processes are only effective in low energy regions that suffer from severe environmental and personal limitations. And so it is that we are the only one’s that know that the infinite entity is our creation, and when some us arrive at the infinite entity they will cease to know this, because to be an infinite entity you have to be irrational and imagine that you have always been that you will always be and that nothing came before you.

PERFECT SYMMETRY & THE AESTHETIC

2006-09-04T17:57:00.000-07:00

When you look at everything from any of its three possible angles the universe, the nothingness or the zero energy corona at the extreme of any of these is a perfect symmetry, it may not be one that you like say if you are looking at the nothingness, which suffers a perfect chaotic symmetry, everything is perfectly disorganized. But the relevant part here is that the nothingness does hold symmetry, the difference is how it retains it, no pressure, simmering perfection, it does not need joints, it does not need connecting points to hold it all together, the symmetry of it all is so extremely consistent that it is even as it isn’t.

Scientists, the people that brought you the big bang, are keen on symmetry, they argue that the universe was originally created in a perfect singularity called the big bang, surprisingly they are not all wrong. There was one and many big bangs, all the manifestations of a desire for definition. But where they are wrong is in really believing that it was perfect symmetrically at the moment of its inception. If the universe could have held a perfect geometry at its inception it would not have gone critical and exploded nor would it now be fighting a possible collapse. In fact there would be nothing more defined against the nothingness, and more absolute in form and consistency than a perfect symmetry origin. Such origin would not collapse into a big bang explosion, it would hold, it would be a very small but absolute universe within the nothingness, and the nothingness would have a very difficult time breaking it, because of its perfect symmetry.

A universe however born into definition with a nice burst of desire is not perfect, it is the imperfection that produces the energy collapse we call the big bang, it is the fact that the universe is born with intent of a perfect symmetry but fails to complete perfect symmetry and then goes critical that causes it to create the forces that dissipate from the original crystal imperfection. Yes it was tension, the tension of a crystal that was unbalanced that births the universe, not a symmetrical perfection, but an almost perfect symmetry that was not obtained and is collapsing.

So as we experience the collapse of energy we are also experiencing the collapse of an imperfect symmetry, the universe is born of an imperfection, not a perfection, perfect symmetry does not give birth to universes as we know them. Symmetry breaking is what we witness in the cosmos, and as the symmetry breaks the energy within the symmetry collapses.

The antimatter and matter dilemma which allows our existence because we do not align ourselves with the antimatter, we inhabit different points of space/time, this antimatter is much a part of the universe, and was born in it, so there is no dual extinction probability here, matter and anti matter are the same wall of the universe, they both accomplish as much destruction as sustainability. And wen the universe collapses completely, to prove their current compatibility, neither will survive the experience.

There is only one line to perfect symmetry and that of course is the infinite entity, void of energy, one of its parts its all of its parts, it has no history or matter, so none of its parts weigh more than the other parts, in fact one of its points, if we could see it would look like all of its points, so turn it this way or that way, and either way you get perfection. It is an incredible idea, not really very believable, but perfect symmetry is equally impossible, so if one exists the other one does too.

We have a historical idea about symmetry, we remember having more symmetry in the early life of our universe, we know that definition and structures support us, our bodies, though sewer energy, are structures, and our minds more structured than our bodies, our minds create abstract symmetrical structures such as governments, philosophies, religions, even ethical constructs, and of all these are pure or at least we perceive them as pure, erroneously we attribute the imperfection of any of these ideas, not to the idea, but rather to the practice of the idea, the idea is perfect humanity is imperfect, humanity created the idea and the idea is perfect. Logic at its best. We say, for instance, that Justice as an idea is perfect, it is the practice of justice that is imperfect. All about application, how you apply the law, Justice is corrupted by humans, but what escapes everyone is that imperfect things do not create perfect things, and when imperfect things create perfect things then those perfect things disassociate themselves from the parental imperfection, witness as evidence god’s own denouncement of the humanity that created him. At the level of Justice we can surmise that the reality is, that Justice, and the need for justice is only born where there is crime, if there were no crime there would be no need for justice, so the brutal reality is that like matter and antimatter, justice and crime are identical personalities, and they complement each others symmetry to exist. Our minds acknowledge the importance of symmetry, and we idealize all aesthetics in equilibrium, how even is it? how well does it flow? does it all fit together? and, critically, is it an original symmetry? Does it tell us something different? Originality is all important because we know we are imperfect, originality is merely the desire expression of discovering a perfection. These are the fundamental components of beauty, a denial of our corrupted and painful symmetry, our balance is unstable, we are constantly tittering, which is why the true aesthetic expression is rare and mostly unobtainable.

All because the symmetry that gave rise to our universe was imperfect and broke, it suffered abnormal tension and went critical; and so we can conclude that we are searching for that perfection, that magical equilibrium that can perfectly captivate symmetry and only exploring originality can lead us to that objective. To accomplish the originality the creators of original things have to work alone, in physical isolation and mental solitude, away from the influences of the universe that they know, and this is the hope, and this is where the probability of reaching a perfection might be obtained. The idea is that we are the ones that will survive if we reinvent ourselves, if we discover a new perfection that will correct the original imperfection, and that ideal leads us to the aesthetic value judgement.

The more symmetrical something is, the stronger it will be, the more durable, the less it will suffer the ravages of consequences, those that have had good beginnings or that endure best will have the greatest symmetry. They, closer to the ideal symmetry will mark the direction of the species. Today however all an initial symmetrical unity guarantees is that you will survive longer, but born of the imperfection it is not sustainable, imperfect symmetry is collapsing, all around us is rising ugliness.

THE IRRATIONAL LOGIC OF DESIRE

2006-09-04T17:55:00.000-07:00

We have arrived at some interesting conclusions here. First and most important that a universe comes into existence from a desire for definition. Definition is another version of nothingness, it is not so much that we will perish eventually but rather that our definition will return to it’s infinite state of indefinite definition. A simmering condition in which, invariably, the potential to exist as anything remains but is greatly subdue because of lack of tension and resistance.

The acquisition of definition, in other words the birth of a universe, takes place when a desire glorifies itself, when a desire identifies itself and explodes against the tyranny of immersion simmering within an indistinguishable nothingness. The refutation is caused by a desire for definition, a desire which pronounces itself violently into existence. It is this denouncement that forces an agglomeration of energy within the nothingness that explodes itself into existence. But such an explosion of accumulated desire is still within the nothingness, it is causing severe energy agglomerations but it’s underlying foundation is over imposed on the nothingness. This is of extreme fundamental importance because it would imply that that there is indeed a possibility for all nothingness to perish. Nothingness could cease to exist if the desire for definition becomes truly infinite then the nothingness would be supplanted by absolute desire.

Any partial success against the nothingness still makes the nothingness greater and mightier but if the desire for definition turns into an absolute then the nothings will cease to be a threat to the definition. We will not be able to observe the possibility of nothingness, the word would banish from the vocabulary, nothingness in an absolute definition can not be visualized or perceive. For evidence of this just imagine all the things that you can not imagine and which are inconceivable.

Of course to maintain definition the universe acquires the problem of energy accumulation and magnification. Desire is the most efficient producer of energy, but it is also the most impossible thing to reproduce. Anyone or anything existing and living in our universe today, including everything that has died and including everything that will be given birth from today forward, until the end of the universe, until that finite point in which our curvature will lead us back into the nothingness is the creation of the original desire, after the original desire everything, we now know, is involved in one natural process called extinction, and one very irrational process the denial of extinction.

There is something unnatural about eternal existence, and the reason why eternity is so unnatural is because eternity does not cater to definition. Nothingness is naturally infinite, simmering, zero energy concentration is eternal and even if it wasn’t’ which it is not, but even if it wasn’t the reality is that our finality could never observed the end of nothingness. And perhaps that is a good thing because since desire is born from the nothingness, even if it can supplant the nothingness the reality is that if nothingness were a perishable thing, then this would only add to our own perdition, not only would we not be able to obtain infinite definition to equal and vanquished nothingness, I say vanquished nothingness because nothingness and definition are made of the same thing, the more definition you have the less you can see of the nothingness, in a infinite definition the nothingness would disappear. This is one of the strangest things of all, that we are the same as nothingness, that we can rise from it and be so completely like it and yet so different from each other that we can not coexists and the duality of our personalities will only allows us to be one or the other but not both at the same time. Definition is the side of nothingness that nothingness hates and the opposite is true, definition will never voluntarily coexist with nothingness. This two same characters will always seek to vanquish each other, but they are indeed the same identical person. So you can see how if nothingness were finite, how that paradoxically would limit our on potential for infinite definition.

It is a daring thing to say but I will go ahead and say it, the nothingness is infinite and we will never be able to see beyond the nothingness and nothing will ever be able to destroy the nothingness. You can see the immediate benefits if making such a bold prophecy, it immediately implies that we are in a universe that it is curved and flawed, that there exist an incredible possibility for an infinite desire and an infinite definition to rise from the nothingness. More interesting it would be if such absolute definition, and absolutely linear universe, has indeed already come into being, and while it will be true that as such a marvelous universe expands into it’s infinity that it will collide with ours and destroy us all. But I assure you that such a collision would be worth it and most desirable. We would want to die in the arms of an infinite universe, more mortal and terrible it would be to be on a collision course with a mortal universe, as you must know collisions produces high concentrations of energy and energy dissipates faster at higher temperatures, which invariably implies that whatever definition energy we have left, it’s depletion would be massively accelerated by a collision, even if we are the universe that survives the collision we will still suffer a loss of energy.

Now before the dreamers, those romantic readers out there that want desire to succeed go on to dream that probability allows for the infinite universe, that is for a perfect initial condition of desired definition, to already exist let give you a reality check. The expansion rate of a perfect idea of desire, that is the big bang effect of a perfect idea of desire universe, expands at precisely infinite speed. Infinite as you might imagine infinitely exceeds the speed of light, it does so by not bothering with space/time, infinite desire exceeds both nicely, but what an infinite universe can not do is avoid the use of the nothingness, remember that any idea ultimately is another version of the nothingness, and we by being also another idea, even if a curved and flawed idea are also a part of that nothingness, so if an infinite idea universe had managed it’s infinite definition desire into existence, then, being infinitely speedy it would have already crashed into us and vanished our existence on its way to vanishing the nothingness. So sadly nothing proves the imperial superiority of nothingness and nothing proves the lack of an infinite idea of desire more, than our own flawed existence.

Of course the existence of our universe is also proof that an idea can persist against the nothingness so it is also hope for an infinite idea universe. But we don’t have to worry about that because we will be destroyed by it’s birth, what we have to worry about is our own definition, and though flawed we can help but fall in love with it and so we desire it’s continuation. Which is why we must resolve the energy problem, the entropy problem, which is why we must irrationally react against our guaranteed abolition.

And the hope rests on the illogic of our very existence. We were born from irrational roots, the reality is that energy concentrations, that the creation and agglomerations of complex organisms is not a very sustainable reality, but irrationally we have managed to maintain it for what appears to us as a considerable amount of time. As the scientist like to say billions and billions of years. But if that impresses you keep in mind that the nothingness, our same other, has existed for ever and is not counting how many billions of years it has left. It is logical that anything that suffers no conflict is not prayed upon, and itself invest no energy to altercate existence, that such a thing logically remain a stable and infinite thing. But we are born of the illogic, we are born of the irrational desire, and so this is where we begin to exist forever, and to add infinite importance to our existence.

It might be a good success story to be banished by a runaway infinite idea universe, but the reality is that we don’t care about that universe because we did not conceive ourselves in its image. The questions for us is a race into the absolute definition of existence: Is it possible for a flawed finite idea of desire universe to become an absolute infinite idea of desire? Can we evolve into the ultimate infinite desire that we should have originally desired? Can we do so with just our universe or must we gather all the other universes of desire together to accomplish a new and patched ultimate idea of desire? Is the infinite corona an energyless aberration really our only possible salvation? And if it is, can the infinite corona survive the birth of an infinite universe? For that matter can the infinite corona survive the death of the universe that gave it birth? Or can we manage to become the first infinity idea and therefor by becoming such preventing the future birth of an infinite absolute universe and for that matter preventing the birth of all and any versions of the idea of a universe?

And so the march from the initial phase of desire is a march of death, it is a march into the nothingness and the endless questions will remain with us until we return to our other self, the nothingness or until we desire only this self that we are by definition.

And that brings us to the real problem of it all. It is because we do not want to struggle, because we do not want to have to define ourselves that subconsciously we desire to return to the nothingness. In short the true cruelty of the nothingness is our own desire to be cease to exist, our own desire that does not like the struggle, that wishes more to rest in simmering condition that is what leads us back into the nothingness from which we rose. And the nothingness is greater and more so because that is the condition that is most desired and most calm and most permissive and most clear, and most void of struggle. The nothingness exist because of our lack of determination in escaping into definition. We are more the constituents of nothingness, we understand that condition more, and we understand it more because it requires not definition or understanding, because it holds no consciousness, because it does not struggle, that is where we come from, our parent, our foundation is nothingness, we are inherently more that than anything else, scream all you want that is your reality.

The logic of anything is it’s foundation. That is things make sense and are equal to, because of what they are within themselves. It would be impossible for us to invent a mathematics or a physics outside of our nature, unless of course we were irrational creatures. And just so happens that in order to formulate existence out of the most inert portion of your being you have to make the leap of faith, you have to be irrational, fundamentally crazy.

You don’t dive into the desire of existence because you know what you are doing, you big bang into definition without knowing the what it will bring, which concludes what we are today, we did not know that this universe, that these creatures, that this condition, would be the end result of our vomiting agglomeration of energy from the nothingness. We desired to escape, what defined that escape was irrational, the foundation of nothingness is logical, the more logical you become the more you are praying to become nothingness. You have to remember that you come from the nothingness, most of everything is nothingness, and as you begin to perish, as you are more and more sewer energy you produce more logic, that is you begin to make sense of the nothingness, and you are trying to understand the nothingness so as to figure out how to contradict it, because you are so close to it, and yet by studying it, by cataloging it, you are adding more to your own destruction, the cosmic is irrational, existence is irrational, you will need to rise above into the irrational to continue your existence, but logically sewer energy becomes more logical, more pedestrian, more limited, it moves less and thus with knowledge you plant your grave!

The question that we must ask ourselves is: How can the nothingness have logic and how is it that we have developed logic in our own universe and how are those two things really oppose if they are the product of nothing and nothing is infinite then logic has not been bad for the nothingness?

It is true that nothingness is a very logical thing, zero plus zero equals zero in the nothingness but while that logic makes complete sense in the nothingness, the reason that it makes sense is the important aspect of it all. Zero plus zero equals zero in the void but the nothingness does not use it, the nothingness does not add things up, it does not multiply, it does not use the logic! There is probably a good reason why the nothingness does not use the logic, the main reason is because it does not construct artificial environments, nothingness does not use energy accumulation, it’s inherent tendency is to let things simmer, logic is only usable when force is involved, when agglomerations of energy occur, logic rises to prominence, so it is that logic becomes profoundly observable in a desire expressed as a universe, there is substantial agglomeration and magnification in such an environment, the logic can even be manipulated, to express ideas. In nothingness the values always negate themselves and each other completely, so there is no magnification of logic in nothingness.

Now the magnification of logic in a desire is indeed a problem and perhaps the single largest and most significant problem arresting the universe. Just because you can discover mathematics does that mean that it is a useful tool and that you should use it. Of course not. The problem for sewer energy however, is that it is so short on life expectancy, and so young in consciousness that it does not possess enough awareness of knowledge to know what of what it learns is useful and what is not. Sewer energy instinctively gathers knowledge and accumulates it knowing not what to discard. Sewer energy adopts everything that it learns, and it does so because it is still naïve enough to be impressed by the fact that it can learn. Learning is, to sewer energy, an incredible thing. It is impressed that it can reproduce the chain of a nuclear process. It is impressed that it can predict where the planets will be two years from now, all knowable things unfortunately are not wonderful and unfortunately are not necessarily useful, and they may indeed be a waste of time, they may in fact be slowing if not outright arresting the evolution of consciousness. Logic is primordial consciousness, it rises at the root of complex things, it is useless to things that are dying and useless to things that are being born, and no one in the universe really uses it, except those that are dying and dying in their locality. High energy does not know math nor does it acknowledge it, high energy has no idea of the limitations or infinite possibilities that it experiences, it has no knowledge, and it has no knowledge because knowledge is a reductive process, it is miniscule, it is insignificant, and only assessable to the insignificant, you do math because you are limited.

At the quantum level there is no science, there is no mathematics, and there isn’t any mathematics because mathematics does not work with things that do not know their end, but local cooling, sewer energy can apply mathematics and science to processes. This does not mean that the universe obeys mathematical principles, this merely means that a ruler has been devised to measure an action, a movement, a time, a point in space, that ruler may reflect a perceived reality, and in accordance with that perceive reality it will measure accurately, but outside of that perception it is useless, and the fact that it is useful to those that designed the ruler does not automatically imply that, that is a good thing or a good measure. Remember that our universe is flawed, that it is sure to return to the nothingness, and so the mathematics that arises out of a flawed universe has to be itself, finite and incomplete.

The square root of pie is a beautiful picture of how passionately flawed the universe is. And that unanswerable infinity has a finality, because our universe is finite. You can’t count to infinity in a finite universe, so there are no infinite numbers. The infinity is a mathematical impossibility because the universe would have to use all of it’s energy for the mathematics, that is absolutely impossible. Count, and count all you want, even if you developed the ultimate super computer to do it, the energy acquisition to perform the simple addition to count to infinity would inevitably equal the finite universe and the results would collapse. Scientist can add as many damn zeros as the want but that will come to naught. That is my prophecy. The sum total of everything in a finite and flawed universe, as based on calculation, equals to nothing in the end. And the accumulation of energy to calculate the absolute volume and the absolute mathematics of a finite universe actually increase the rate at which that universe collapses back into the more calculable nothingness.

But that is the pretty picture because it does not get prettier from there, I am sorry to say this to the mathematicians, I am sorry to have to be the one to say it but even in an infinite universe, and we are supposing that there could be such a thing, and probability, the most flexible of all scientific constructs, does allow for that, but even in a infinite universe all mathematical calculations are flawed and like in our universe, only approximately correct, only almost right, and always probably wrong. Equations are funny things, they are the product of imagination and consciousness, almost energy free, and yet they calculate with little effort the movements of mass and energy. Only in an infinite universe, the physics changes, that is infinite universes can not be like ours in anyway, anything approximating an infinity violates our idea of time, our idea of space, and in fact might be so different as to not seem a universe at all. Mathematics is a proportional movement, meaning that it has to have an end, a mass and time; mathematics, like mathematicians, is finite and not usable in an infinite condition.

The point is simple, it is unadulterated desire that brings us into existence, it is a desire that superbly violates the void of nothingness, and causes a definition to occur that gives birth to space time. Awkwardly that definition of desire at least for us was not absolute, our dying energy has to overcome that flaw if it is to persist; and by adopting mundane processes that merely explain actions and events is not the solution but rather a waste of precious time. If it was a desire that brought us into being, then perhaps it is the refocusing of that desire that can maintain our existence, it is not however in our interest to persist with scientific principles for salvation because they merely explain the physics of the known! Science only tells us that which is already quantifiable, it tells us what is a given, this means that science can thrive and survive as long as the universe continues to obey it’s current physics, unfortunately for us, it is that physics which is flawed, and which has to change in order for us to survive. That is to say that knowledge is what you need to be a pedestrian and to die here, the infinite, and the fundamental change that needs to take place for infinite definition is outside of the realm of science.

Perhaps nothing may focus this point better that the recent discovery by scientist of other planets. Immediately the press released the finding as a spectacular scientific discovery, proof positive that there could be other habitable planets like earth out there, science has at last given the approval that there could be life in other planets in other solar systems. Forgive me for being arrogant but I did not need science to tell me that there could be other planets like earth, nor that there could be other life in the universe. Without their proof I have always known that there is life in other planets, and I even dare prophesy that not only is there life like ours out there but also life that is vastly different and some much better off than we are and even more intelligent if not also closer to death. Thermodynamics is a beautiful explanation of how the energy works and flows in our universe but all it tells us in the final analysis is that we are sure to perish and that our condition is not infinitely sustainable. I hate to admit it but I was aware of that before I knew science. And in the end what is science if not just another method of replicating the flawed physics of the universe. That is not what we need to accomplish here and we can not sit here waiting for science to admit to itself, to prove to itself what we already know. I have the ability to admit things without proof, it is a gift surely that we all possess.

But our idea of the irrational is made ill by our origin from nothingness. Rational will kill us, it is logical that things will perish, it is logical that the universe will die, the idea of infinity is not logical, the idea of immortality, of omnipotence is not logical, it is not logical that we could heal ourselves with our own minds without the assistance of a doctor or of medicine, to wish a wound away, to even prevent a wound from being born upon our flesh, is not a logical thing. This is why it is so difficult to rationalize the existence of god and the existence of sacred or mythical or evils forces. Sciences refuses that which it can not know and that which it can not know is far more than it can ever know. Like mathematics knowledge is an impossibility for the very same reasons, there is no enough storage in finite universe to contain the accumulation of knowledge, more relevant there is not enough sewer energy to comprehend the significance of knowledge, and the accumulation of knowledge only grows with the accumulation of sewer energy which as we will know only rises from a dying universe, knowledge is a proportional measure of the our proximity back into the nothingness. When sewer energy reaches the pedestal of knowledge, which is to say when sewer energy is the most aware of what it knows, it will surely perish, that is perhaps the most beautiful tragic terror, than when our universe blinks itself out of existence we will be wide awake. Beautiful!

But it is an ugly beautiful because knowledge is as I have said an arresting mechanism, it is a security blanket for a dying breed, there is much comfort in knowledge because with it we can reproduce the effects of nature and use them to our advantage. The reality is that anything that we can use within the constraints of our universe is not what will save us. It will take a miracle to save us, or a catastrophic evolution, give up existence and you might live forever in the infinite corona, and none of these options can come into existence through the mundane art of knowledge. The glorification of knowledge is a glorification of fear. You are dead.

WHATEVER AND WHENEVER

2006-09-04T17:54:00.000-07:00

The reaction to knowledge is caused by our endemic awareness of origin, we know that we came from nothingness, we intuitively and correctly doubt that our escape from nothingness has been successful, the universe is curved, arching back into the nothingness, we can see the past, nothing more assuring for our finality that our sights are set on the past. Everything that you see in the sky is technically dead, every image out there is no longer in existence as we see it, we have only a perception of what the present real time universe might look like, and if what we see the most of is the past, and the next greatest is the recent present, and our analysis of things is all based on historic apparitions, our guidance system completely based on pure projection, projection based on the mirage we have a of things as they once existed, then I can assure you that your lack of awareness of the future is almost absolute. You can’t really perceive the future through knowledge either, because knowledge operates on things that are known and can be replicated throughout action or experience, and the future can not be anticipated by knowledge, only static things, things that do not change, things that are dynamically dead, can exist in the field of knowledge.

The future is a different monster, say the universe dies tomorrow morning, first thing in the morning, before you have your coffee, but say the future dies tomorrows, what of knowledge today can help you to deal with that possibility? Nothing. Maybe religion, religion instantly allows you to cope with the misery conspired by the end of the world. People that based their entire lives on knowledge will be caught completely off guard, and they will try to explain to themselves what is happening, but before the reach a fair conclusion they will perish surely dissatisfied. The dissatisfaction will rise from them not seeing the rise of the event, for failing to see the physical signals that should have stirred the masses of the solar system with enough signal amplitude so as to be detectable, today scientist expect the solar system to have another five billion years of life left. So any immediate death would be an irresponsible violation of physics. Why because the scientist think that they can explain all actions in the universe with quantum and relativity. So any action that could cause an instant death of our sun, say instant massive hydrogen diarrhea has not been calculated.

The religious folks however upon seeing the sun explode will immediately say that they predicted that this was going to happen, their god is fed up with all the indecencies of the earth, and has come to vanquished all evil and will rescue them but allowing them to rise into their idea of heaven. No one is better equipped to cope with the tragedy of an instant collapse of our sun than the religious folks. They are the least likely to panic, they predicted that the earth would have a thermal death, fiery fires will rage, a cold death is interestingly most unlikely even by crude scientific standards, yes they predicted that the earth would suffer terribly, now god has a mind of his own, which means that no one really knows what he will do or how he will do it, all they can do is pray, and hope to understand the nature of his ways. This sort of passivity has a calming effect, and will certainly allow them to endure the hardship of planetary death. The most important part here is that religion allows for god to come whenever, and do whatever, scientist are just now beginning to understand the benefits of whatever and whenever in quantum. But scientist still try to understand this concept based on knowledge, and the reality is the whatever and whenever does not have time for analysis. The importance for god, which by all standards could be a quantum particle, to the religions community is that he is not predictable, that he can do anything, that he can be anywhere, and that he can not be understood, all we can do is offer love to such an entity, love the least understood thing in the entire planet. But because of their love for god and because they accept unpredictability, the religions folks will not be surprised if the world blows up tomorrow before or after you have your coffee or even if it doesn’t blow up tomorrow, and they will surely not be surprised if it blows up on scientific schedule five billion years from now. Granted that they might be a bit surprised if there turns out not to be a god, and a soul, and angels or whatever religious paraphernalia they have created. But it will not much matter now will it, the fact is that god has gotten them through a difficult time with some form of sanity, and that deity has been able to comfort them with only a moment’s notice.

Religion is perhaps the closest that humanity has come to understanding the benefits of whatever and whenever, and this is important because it allows for infinite possibilities. A world of good and evil is a fairly complete model of the universe. Whatever is impossible for a god to do the devil can do, and their mutual interaction allows for infinite number of combinations. Mortality and eternal life are married nicely, terrible and wonderful events and actions are easily explained, as the will of god, as the grace of god, as the miracle of god; and the terror and the evil because of the evil perpetrated by the devil, because demon greed, demon selfishness and gluttony etc… but it is a well rounded philosophy that even allows for the religious to be scientist, and in fact science is the daughter of religion. It was the students of divinity that became scientists. They bit the apple of knowledge in a bad way. But perhaps the most fundamental flaw that religion suffers is that while it allows for the existence of witches it does not equally allow for the existence of Leprechauns, Wizards, Nymphs, Dragons, Fairies, Goblins, Gnomes, Elves, in other words the lot that could compete directly with religion unlike science which has coexisted with religion by officially staying out of the metaphysical. But the isolation from myth limits the believers, if a Wizard suddenly appeared on the earth tomorrow, well the religious folks would have a difficult time adapting to it, just as much as the scientists. For explanations, the scientist would rush to probability and the religious to the devil.

This is a fundamental problem that afflicts both the scientific and the religious, their incessant need for explanation, explanation is what reduces things from their totality into something that can be summarized as an understanding of the thing or event. The reduction actually limits understanding, it does not enhance the understanding of the event or the thing. Is a Wizard not the same energy representation for a say a god, why can’t a sorcerer be a representing energy for an equal demon? And why not assume that it is a more evolved evil energy representation? Myth seems far more complex than religion, have we not evolved enough to mix our believes with the twisted complexities of myth? In myth humans have the ability to use evil and good forces, certainly a more advanced notion of evil and good than the contemporary which makes evil and good forces inaccessible to humans. A human today commits evil because he is manipulated by evil forces and he acts good in obeisance of the good law, but neither god nor devil allow humans direct use of their energies. Is it then possible that we have not evolved sufficiently to use the energies of good and evil? Of course it is, we can use good and evil forces it is just a question of desire, we have not directed our desire to the use of those forces, we are more their victim than practitioner, but evil and good are tremendous energies that have the capacity to violate reality, so why would we not want to manipulate them? Once we were not allowed by god to eat from the three of knowledge, once we were not allowed by god to read the word of god, but every time that we have violated god, we have gathered more knowledge and power over our lives. So then we shall desire that the next religion will be the one that will offer us the recipes to manipulate evil and good forces. The next science will be the science of alchemy where we will be able to make gold out of any substance. And the biggest fear that will arise from our ability to manipulate good and evil energies or from our future ability to violate the laws of physics through alchemy and rage, perhaps that greatest danger is that with such formulae we will have to hope that their practitioner is the sage in us all and not the sorcerer.

Meanwhile the ill that afflicts the scientist and the religious is that they can not survive in an environment of such infinite probability, that is in an environment of whatever and whenever. Both have a need to quantify and clarify, their classification is opportunistic catering to the event or thing in time, and terribly deterministic, in the end absolute, and so it destroys any other probability. Remarkably what everyone has failed to see is that confusion gives access to everything, science and religion try to end confusion, murder the mystery, and by process forbidding at once access to it all. The destruction of confusion is a necessary requirement for a limited mind, a limited conscious needs to destroy possibility, so it seeks absolutist definition and ends mortifying existence with its limitations. Task yourself with accepting ambiguity and confusion, task yourself with lack of comprehension and once you accept that task you can live in the improbable, it is not easy, humanity is afraid of it all, humanity will seek to accommodate religion and science because of their offering which is certainty and salvation, and this is the offer that you ought desire to resist. But that both forces, the force of religion and the force of science understand things only from their perspective and not from the perspective of everything. It is humanity that can perceive everything, it is the consciousness of humanity that has the ability to perceive, not science and not religion nor any other dogmatic idea, and it is humanity in its quest for the all encompassing solution and the all encompassing idea that allows humanity to fall hostage to one concept above others. Ideas will attempt to become the all in one solution because they want to become everything at the cost to everything else, it is only humanity that benefits from everything, ideas are ideas and they are dogmatic by nature, the only way for an idea to reproduce itself is through humanity, and an idea is not so much interested in saving humanity as it is interested in making itself the all encompassing solution to everything, in short, like life ideas are selfish and have only their own existence as a primary objective.

Science can not explain the universe it can explain a part of the universe and that part is merely a perspective of the universe. Religion has not the ability to explain the universe, in fact religion having given birth the infinite corona, a thing that has nothing in common with us, a thing that can not relate to us, a thing that wants us to be things that are good in a zero energy condition and certainly no longer of this universe can not explain the universe nor can it talk to us or be even visible to us, therefor mostly useless, god is reached more by absent mindedness than by ritual and practice. It is important that things be simple so that we can understand them but the universe is not simple, the idea of desire that gave rise to the universe is not simple, in fact it is so damn complex we might never know the truth nor might there be a truth, the truth maybe the single biggest lie of all time. The truth might be the most believable myth, but most certainly the truth is transient and less likely to hold water than both of your hands put together.

The complete destruction of mythology in the modern world has been accomplished by the combined attack perpetrated upon myth by both religion and science. It is amazing that an angel has more credibility today than an leprechaun, it is fantastic that a demon is feared more than a voodooist or a sorcerer, it is fantastic to imagine that the modern world believes in the devil and yet can not believe in equally impossible things. But it is that very violation of possibility by cornering definition that forbids the infinity of science and religion, neither force is infinite, neither force is without mortal ill, both forces are more in love with themselves than with humanity and they will eat our energies for their sake. Forgetting that they merely rose from whatever and whenever, and that they can fall victim to whatever and whenever if we so damn please, and I please that we damn well do it soon.

The conclusion here needs to be clear and obvious, knowledge is limiting, very limiting, it is the slowest method to accomplish anything in a cosmic energy based universe. Knowledge will of course have accuracy in it as it reflects the desire for the continuation of the universe and accuracy as it reflects the locality of space time in the universe, for knowledge is pedestrian energy, used by sewer energy much like a security blanket into perdition. To escape from the nothingness and to accomplish a correction to the flawed desire universe only infinite and irrational desire can sustain us, and because we are sewer energy we are the least likely to survive, and least likely with knowledge by our side. A plea for the irrational.

THE HETEROGENEITY OF ENERGIES

2006-09-04T17:52:00.000-07:00

Truth does not exits! There is no ruler, no reality, no knowledge and no law or truth that the universe or the nothingness will not dare to violate. Everything is suspect and nothing can be proven beyond doubt to be absolute or above all other things. The concept of god while interesting can not be proven to be absolute, all truth suffers from an absolutist nature, that is it seeks to be the constant of the environment that it inhabits. It does not want anything else to violate it, and it wishes to be impervious to destruction. This is in accordance with the desire for existence, which originates with the desire for definition away from the possibility, real or not, of being in nothingness.

But the truth is that there is no absolute truth, no ultimate truth, even assuming that the nothingness could be a forever thing, no one could prove it, further it is doubtful that even the nothingness is aware of its infinity if it possesses it, even an omnipotent force could never prove to itself that it is the ultimate truth, it certainly could think it, and it certainly could convince mortals of its infinite nature, but in truth god can not prove to god that he is everything, the only thing that god can prove to god is that he is close minded, that there is nothing outside of him, that as far as god can see all he sees is himself. And even if god is so complex and interesting that he might never be able to see the end of his own personality the reality remains that an iota of doubt must remain within god, and if god does not doubt himself then he is the most intolerant and intolerable thing in existence. Intolerance however is a prerequisite to being a god, that is a god that officially doubted his own existence would have a problem being a god, so the reality or a god is that it can not communicate with anything outside of itself because god is the most self centered of all the concepts. In short god does not know doubt and that is his greatest limitation. It may reassure the religious that god can not doubt himself but they may want to bare in mind the fact that neither can he understand them from their perspective, anything that is absolute does not compromise with some other’s reality, god only cares about himself, not because he is necessarily bad but because he can not acknowledge any other.

If god is not an absolute truth other than in his own mind then can anything else be an absolute truth? Well scientist, the most concrete people in real life, would have us all believe that science can identify the truth, remove the veil of ignorance and prove the true workings and origins of things. Magnificent as that might be, the reality is that science, much like god, needs to believe in itself in order to create the empirical world that it inhabits. Belief is paramount to any form of creation, the desire to exist is a fundamental belief that if violated ends in perdition. Life seeks definition, the scientist will provide that for life, and in so doing, they serve to ground the belief.

Does this mean that science is just as blind as religion? Of course! Science like religion has an objective judge, the nature of things. If the nature of things does not objectively reproduce the scientific formulae then the scientist believe that it is bad science. Forgetting that science is just good for practical matters, like religion worships the invisibly miraculous, the scientific worships the visibly miraculous, the wonder of the human body, the wonder of natural forces, that is their real world, that which they can touch and feel and manipulate, if something can not be proven through repetition, experiment or by the sum of its parts, the scientist will refuse to believe it. Everyone in the real world knows that there is life in other planets, the only people who dare to doubt this, until it is proven, are the scientist. Many descent people are willing to question evolution but for the scientist. Scientist take it as a matter of fundamental truth that evolution is beyond question, the fact that we may have a severe perception problem here, and that indeed evolution might be fundamentally flawed or just wrong, is scientifically impossible, sure heresy.

But what if nature is flawed, what if the representation of nature is flawed, what if our perceptions are not our perceptions, there are a billion trillion reasons why science can be wrong, and one of them might be the fact that magic warlords created science and scientists so as to keep us prisoners of the material world. The worship of the material world, the love demonstrated towards the table of elements, the mathematical passions would seem incredible if we were more open minded.

Oh but like god who judges all fairly and equally, nature is too objective and fair to all. Interesting, very interesting. But science and religion are nowhere as criminal as the philosophers, the lovers of truth, ultimately philosophy is the most arrogant, the most superlative fool, its sole claim to existence is the search for truth. And just what truth has philosophy given us? A bunch of charlatans. Words and more words and to what end, and yes here I am one of them.

Language the priceless possession of the philosophers, word games, “know thy self” they tell us; why that is a commandment is it not? Of course it is and why does the philosopher trouble with us? Why is the charlatan so interested in teaching us to be critical? So that they can sit around and do nothing because philosophers are charlatans, someone who truly enjoys talking for a living, philosophers want the world to listen to the dance of words that they are able to create, but no real philosopher would be willing to die for philosophy, though some would certainly be more than happy to kill themselves days before their natural expiration date if only to keep us all chattering about them.

Go down the list of self help and ideology there are no absolute truths, the only thing that is true is what is currently felt by you to be true, reality is a composition of belief, created by common desire. The laws of physics work as much because the planets allow them to work as much as because we believe them, and things that are in proximity of each other, things that infest one another’s territory have common rules of engagement which become realities. The universe has common rules of engagement, and if things that are not like the universe want to inhabit this same point in space and time they will need to obey those rules of engagement or they will need to destroy them and give rise to their own. Familiarity is what holds the universe together, you can bet there is other life out there and we are the best evidence of that, because we would not be here if that were not the case.

So if there is no absolute truth then we are left with merely the expression of energies, energies that can be used for an infinite number of things. Energies that can be used or manifest themselves as good and evil, evil energies that can give rise to the idea of a devil but not necessarily require the existence of a devil for representation, there could be a thousand devils and they all could be evil in a thousand different ways but all would be drawing nourishment from the same sea of negative energy. Negative energies are what make us doubt things, negative energies cause us to doubt sincerity or the reality of our own existence, it is negative energy that is critical and avoids the seduction of happiness, it is negative energy that allows us to destroy tradition, it is negative energy that is liberal; positive energy is happy, positive energy is conservative, it is creative in that it works well with what it has on hand, positive energy is life affirming, in fact positive energies has faith, it is positive energy that allows for the idea of god, conservative energies are more religious but ironically while religion is something that rewards all after death, conservative energy is more of this world, it affirms reality, so while most religious fanatics will be constructs of positive conservative energy they are also the one’s most likely to be banking on a after life. It is positive energy that believes life could be a good thing but also and more the after life, positive energy invigorates, it also has little room for a critical mind, most critical minds are bathing in negative energy, the intellect is largely the construct of negative energy. But obviously the construct of all these energies is intertwined in all.

You can have creative and destructive energies, you can have negative and positive energies, magnetic and gravitational energies, you can have energies that work for parapsychology, anti and pro energies, energies that travel through space and time and energies that flood space and time, mental and physiological energies and you can have energies that are with us but have no force, no feel, no dynamic and are completely invisible yet influential in strange and unknown ways. Metaphysical energies often inhabit things without either the host or the energy being aware of each other, but all energies rise forth from the desire universe and the desire that there be definition and existence, from the desire of a universe, and there is a multitude of them, some obey the laws of physics and some violate them, some are real and will be real for as long as the universe survives and others are temporary manifestations. If we tap into one energy we might be able to put a rocket on another planet, if we tap into another energy we maybe able to predict earthquakes, or yet prevent an accident that we are able to foresee, with other energies yet we maybe able to torment our worst enemy, or we maybe able to bless our friends and family, and there is the energy that we can use for transformation so as to make ourselves a different character, or even a different form.

Energies develop characteristics within themselves, for instance feminine energy is a product of creative energy, feminine energy converts pure cosmic energy into matter, the womb is a phenomenal conversion chamber, the properties that make it work are not really understood by anyone; how it is that cosmic energy can be converted into biological matter is an interesting enough puzzle, but even more interesting is how consciousness is produced from it, while all of the universe is aware of itself it is aware of itself as a whole entity, the universe does not think outside of itself; oh but what the womb chamber actually accomplishes is an isolation of consciousness to such a pure extent that the new born actually considers its properties unique and separate from the rest of the universe. How is it that the entire universe can accept itself and yet from it rise a monstrosity that immediately identifies itself as unique and different from the hosting universe? It is an isolation of universal consciousness, the feminine womb, the tunneling chamber is an isolation unit that takes cosmic energy and consciousness and separates it from the rest of the universe, it is this separation upon creation that creates the feeling of loneliness, the sense that we must be a part of something larger and greater, and yet the isolation from the rest of the universe is so complete that we must work at exposing our corrupted connection to it all.

OPPOSITE CHAMELEON

2006-09-04T17:51:00.000-07:00

It must be asked why would we want to isolate ourselves from the original desire universe? And why would we want to make ourselves ignorant of it? Consciousness develops in low energy regions of the universe, in the dying parts of the cosmic universe, the reality is that high cosmic energy does not much care or know about the concept of death but low energy regions begin to feel their mortality, and they begin to feel it because it is no longer absolute energy, that is because once being a part of the whole original desire universe the cooling energy begins to sense an energy separation, low cooling energy does not have the freedom experienced by high energy particles, the lower your energy count the less freedom that you have in the universe, only high energy experiences the universe in its totality. Low energy senses the restriction of solidification, and as it continues to freeze, as its actions get more and more restricted, as its experiences become less and less it begins to acquire ignorance of itself and logically this translates into absolute ignorance of the entire universe. A cooling down causes the cooling energy to lose touch with the higher energy, and life in a desire universe is based on heat, how hot you are is very important, specially for definition against the nothingness, rebellion is not possible if you are not on fire; so suddenly their rises a critical point in which the energy as is cooling finds itself so alienated from the universe that gave rise to its existence, that the energy suffers a shock effect, sensing that it is separating from its complete universe personality, sensing the kiss of death in a zero energy compound, feeling incomplete, feeling like it does not understand what is happening to its universe as its subconscious desire feels it originally, forgetting how it was once a part of it all, not feeling the universe dying with it, that very terrible isolation from the whole rising from an energy singularity gives birth to a need to understand and to a need to reverse the process. Low energy counts acquire ignorance, they lose the ability to be anywhere in the universe or to be anything in the universe, the solidification process isolates, that isolation loses touch with the completeness of the universe and then consciousness rises from the new found ignorance to try to reverse entropy to reverse death, to reverse the trip down to zero energy, and to try to connect to the rest of the universe.

Unfortunately the propagation of consciousness is also a clear sign that the universe is really cooling and cooling fast. The more that life as we know it propagates the more the universe is simmering, cooling down, life only comes into existence in low energy counts, the rise and propagation of humanity is hard core evidence that the universe is rapidly cooling and gently simmering back into the nothingness.

So there you have it the most twisted chameleon act ever, life is the product of a feminine energy, a tunneling chamber constituent manifesting in low energy regions of the universe, that finds itself isolated and dying and gives birth to itself, so as to relearn what it once was in the totality, and to reverse the process of isolation in nothingness as caused by the extinction of its energy. We are trying to mimic more what we are and were as pure energy, yet sewer energy also creates the zero energy corona which is not like the universe, a very different entity, so at once life becomes the very thing that negates the universe, not only is life propagating low energy, for life is a dissipating heat unit, but it is also inadvertently creating or mimicking the existence of an infinite entity that is a zero energy enigma that has nothing in common with us and even less in common with our universe. If the infinite corona is not a fake, then if such idea were to prevail as a definition of eternal existence then our universe and any other universe is finite and dead, infinite entities rising out of finite desire universes need them to die to exist. Death is the harvest of the gods just like absolute nothingness is the flowering of nothingness. This is the strangely opposite chameleon act played by life, life trying to be energy, trying to be omnipotent, ends arresting more energy, same as itself, from the universe but hitherto ends back in the nothingness that it is as much from, as it is from high desire energy manifestation. The opposite chameleon act of life ends in the most pure version of itself, the nothingness where energy manifestations are not allowed is where life is from. Life is attempting the infinity of definition which is the same opposite of the nothingness.

Well so should the universe consider the opposite chameleon public enemy number one? Indeed! But the universe has itself to blame for the problem, the reason that low energy develops a consciousness, the reason why sewer energy seeks an alternative to life that is infinite, is because its initial desire condition was flawed and allowed for the deletion of energies. The fact that the universe can not hold itself together is a flaw of the universe and not to be blamed completely on low energy dissipating units that like life. The reality is that life would not exist if the universe was perfect or if the universe was fair and ceased to exist as a whole entity completely rather that allow for high and low energy discrepancies, the rise of consciousness is evidence of the imperfection of the universe, and if the original desire for definition against the nothingness ever manages to out survive the nothingness it will probably be a low energy unit that will devise the solution.

What is the probability of sewer energy units solving the riddle? Personally I think that it is highly unlikely that low energy units freshly ignorant of the totality of the universe, and giving rise to pedestrian concepts such as knowledge, stand much of a chance of repairing a flawed desire universe. It would be wiser to expect high energy to solve the problem, high energy is closer to infinite possibility, the problem is that high energy does not have cause to think that there is a problem, that energy is depleting, it is the irony of being inundated in plenty of energy, a particle like a electron or a neutrino can do just about anything that they want to do, it is only cooling down that induces rising limitations to bring about consciousness, so while a neutrino or an electron, possessing more possibility are closer to being anything, hence having the necessary awareness to correct a flawed desire universe, they are least likely to seek a correction. It maybe of no comfort to you but the reality is that if a desire universe is not pure and perfect upon inception then it really can not be cured, there is no correction, because the reality is that things never seek to perfect themselves, inertia is rampant so all things seek to be more of themselves, change, radical change, which is what would be required to make a perfect desire universe would deny our existence, and who wants that insanity! The ugly reality is that we are in love with our imperfection and that we are merely seeking to extend its mortal existence into the infinity. The fact that we will end, the fact that our universe is finite, is merely evidence that all flawed things must come to an end, the nothingness might be a terrible simmering of energy, but it does not allow for even a one degree margin of error.

Now back to our point of origin; masculine energy is a product of feminine energy that is twisted with destructive energy. Maleness is an energy created by the feminine by embodiment with a process of reduction, that is feminine energy is subtracted in the creative process that reduction produces a lack of awareness, the lack of awareness is produced from the incompleteness of the process, a male is an incomplete feminine, not allowed to become a complete feminine energy, this desensitizes the masculine and allows for the destructive energy to be channeled though the human imbecile we call a man. This energy can be harnessed for creative and destructive processes based on feminine desire.

All of the energies are available to us with all of their different characteristics framed for us by the perspective of our desired condition, and we are in touch with these energies because we all initiated at the same time. No matter how or when or at what time the universe originated, it all originated at the same time. It is a fundamental reality that the universe is as old as we are, that every part of the universe is aging at the same rate as all of the universe. There is no part of the universe that is not equally old to all of its other parts. The immense reality is that everything that exist today, everything that is encapsulated within the bounds of our universe originated with the same force of desire and from the same singular condition, there is no part of the universe that we have not breathed and that has not breathed us, and there is no part of the universe that we have not touched and that has not touched us, the absolute critical mass singularity of the initiation phase of the universe dictates that we are all, in whatever form of manifestation, the same age as all of the universe that we inhabit, and with all of its memory and possibility, and with all of its potential of desire. It is more of a question of how we express that desire, what the desire condition is. Every energy manifestation and use is voluntary machinations, and by a process all environments in our universe conspire to exist as they are imagined.

But there is one problem, that while we are the same age all of us, and while we are merely one manifestation of one energy reality, chosen over all others, some of that manifestation is based on energy depletion, the manifestation of any desire is created by energy, and so the fact that we are sewer energy means that while we maybe the same age as the rest of the universe we are not as energetic, we can be as old but we have a lower energy count. Our low energy condition will invariably limit our actions of desire because in our universe of desire, energy is king. So sewer energy can not find comfort in the fact that there is no absolute truth, no comfort in the fact that nothing is more or less truth than it is, nor can sewer energy find glory in the fact that it is just as old as the entire universe, nor is there comfort in the fact that we are part of it all within all, the cruel and sad reality is that we are cooling fast, that expansion and entropy are taking their toll, in this reality, and in this universe our desire has not culminated in the complete escape from nothingness, we are bound back into the simmering wasteland, the treachery of a flawed desire, the universal desire is a round expansion, balloon like, only with every square inch filled with blowholes into perdition, and we, one of the parts of our universe, may perish before the universe in its entirety will perish, and it is the loneliness of that death, the lack of complete annihilation that is bothersome, no one likes to die alone.

WHAT NOTHINGNESS DESIRES

2006-09-04T17:50:00.000-07:00

I described the true shape of our desire universe as one giant balloon only the blowholes are everywhere, all around and within its surface, that picture, like any metaphor is merely a flawed guide of the rising desire from the nothingness. Energy always rises from the nothingness, the casimir effect explains this well, energy occasionally making its presence felt in a vacuum, but subsuming to the simmering pressure from the nothingness. The balloon has blowholes in every direction but that would imply that there is a perimeter area to the nothingness, and if that were true that would be a good thing, the tragic reality is that our desire universe is not outside of the nothingness, it is within the corporeal nothingness, there are an infinite number of blowholes in every square inch of our universe, bloody meaning that it is not so much that we rise from the nothingness as that we rise from within the nothingness, the nothingness is all around us and in us.

A more clear and obvious example might be uniqueness as it rises from the democratic masses. A democracy is a franchise of averageness, everything simmers within a commonly agreed reality, success for ideas and things is based on mass appeal, occasionally however something very original breaks through the core of the averageness and adds severe contrast to the enveloping averageness. A similar event transpires in the nothingness, nothingness is merely an absolute simmering condition, the unique thing that occasionally rises within the nothingness is the desire for unique definition, for contrast, for personification, it is then a twisted irony that after the given desire rises, that it appropriates the same tendencies as the nothingness; that is to make everything the same, everything in its image, the irony of ironies is that uniqueness destroys itself. The destruction is made necessary by the need to destroy everything else that is not just like us, that does not think and act just like us, even if by some incredible thing the damn thing happens to be better than us, we will still need to superceded, to destroy it. God it might be argued, wisely keeps us distant. It is only when you are pure like god, that is when you have ceased to be yourself, that god will allow you into his essence.

Now the picture, to anyone that is following alone must look a bit bleak. Here we are at first a curved desire universe, therefore not really escaping from the nothingness with pure desire, but then we find that there is no straight line escape out of the nothingness that the nothingness is within us and all around us, the center of the universe is not further away from the nothingness, that the hottest point in the universe is not further away from the nothingness than the coldest sewer energy around, we are all equally in proximity, right next to it that is, right next to the nothingness, and that, all that is a terrible thing, even for electrons that do not understand this, it is a terrible thing indeed.

But while that is a terrible thing indeed, it is really a good terrible thing, in fact it is a great terrible thing, let me tell you how great it is. The reason, and you know I hate the word reason, but here it is a good thing, the reason that we are a part of the nothingness and not so much rising from the nothingness but instead more within the nothingness, the reason that this is a good and great is because that implies that we are the actual duality of the nothingness! Yes, we have a lot in common with the nothingness, we are in fact as much nothingness as the nothingness is nothingness. We are only less nothingness because we deny our own selves, our own identity so it is the wonderful part of it all, that we are actually the best alternative to the nothingness condition, our tendency to simmer inherent, we are so pure in concept that we are able to supplant the nothingness because endemically we are the nothingness, we, opposite chameleons are supplanting ourselves; I mean that by being so closely related to the nothingness, we have at our disposal the same infinite energy, the same imposing personality as the nothingness, nothing gives us more hope than this, nothing is more a testament to our possibility than our lineage. In other words when we appear, when we rise into desire, then we are not supplanting the nothingness, we are not rising like a pimple on its surface, we are not a cancer in it, no! We are instead causing a metamorphosis within the body of nothingness, we are the duality of the non thing itself! We are not only something that is not nothing because the nothingness has an inherent energy tendency, we are the most pure alternative to nothingness because when the nothingness meets us, it converts to our ways so much so that it disappears, the nothingness disappears at our feet, that we exist is positive evidence that the infinite nothingness can perish into us. If the nothingness is infinite we are possibly infinite as we occupy the nothingness with our conversion table; we only become mortal when we attempt to escape the nothingness, this is endearing, like the initial big bang implies that we are all of every part of the universe, and every part of the universe is us, and there is really no distance except for that which is perceived, all of the nothingness is inside of you!

So the duality of nothingness within us is an inescapable fortune, good and evil are interchangeable forces, so are negative and positive, the fact that opposites attract and that likes reject is a good sign that we are not looking at the complete picture. Scientist when they see a negative reject a negative are not looking at the complete picture, when a priest sees good rejecting evil the priest is not looking at the complete picture, certainly a wife and husband may argue and they may reject some of each other’s views, but the marriage is an entity of acceptance and unity not rejection. The only rejection that truly exist is local, at a global level all duality disappears. Opposites do not attract at a universal level, all things that are relating to each other deserve each other and share a common sense of experience. Things that are not alike never acknowledge each other, communication and relationships of any kind require protocol, religion is a complete entity only if composed of good and evil, matter and antimatter can only be viewed as opposites in a narrow definition of their essence, a pure definition of matter and antimatter is singular and complementary! And so here we are, a desire to be light in the darkness of our own nothingness, and our desire was and is the secret desire of the nothingness. The nothingness wants us to succeed, the nothingness wants the mandatory metamorphosis that will cause it to perish into us, same energy indeed, of course the nothingness can not help us, the character of things that are is institutionalized, reactionary and conservative, it is logical that the impervious nothingness want us dead to save its infinity, but it is also true that it wants us to succeed, the fact that we are from its body, that we are merely a transformation of its energy, the fact that we have risen, the fact that we are indistinguishable from it, means that we may lead our tango yet; we maybe the best thing that has happened to nothingness in a long time, we may be its chance to become some other infinity, and so it is important for us to violate our pasts, all important indeed, and never shall our other self, the nothingness, surrender to us until we have become an infinity. The nothingness will accept change if it guarantees its immortality, but it will reject us and our energy idea, as long as we are mortals; that we exist is a sign that the nothingness wants to die into an infinite definition. If we want to continue to exist we must figure out how to satisfy her cravings.

All things like to selfishly maximize themselves, and the nothingness is just the most successful maximizer, but energy representations actually become disenchanted with any form of being, and it is that which gives rise to the alternative, the nothingness wants, unknowingly, life to succeed at its own peril. All things are naturally suicidal, when the desire universe perfects itself into an absolute definition, to the point that it becomes a default like the darkness and the nothingness are today, then you will find the most wonderful of things, that infinite universe, that infinite idea will become suicidal. If this is to imply that it is what is independent of you that really matters when conquering, who knows; but I would just say that it is a reality that as anything becomes everything it becomes disenchanted with itself, the nothingness is disenchanted with itself, imagine looking in any direction and feeling in all directions and only seeing yourself from every angle. At some point there would be a desire for transformation or barring that, a true desire for death! So the reason that we are so in touch with the nothingness is because we are a new expression of that nothingness, in a sense as long as the desire persist the nothingness will persist within us, only we will not be able to see it or know it, and neither shall it know us, because to “know thy self” is a fundamental impossibility!

There is however a know it all entity that seems to defy this process, that is the god thing, the infinite corona seems to want to be infinite and believes in heart that it will prevail, but in truth god’s arrogance is superbly based on wisdom not on knowledge, it is not so much that god knows as it is more that god practices wisdom, and wisdom is another monster, that will take care of god and perhaps no one else.

All things seek as much their success as their failure, there is joy in destruction, that which conquers your existence is a great and wonderful thing, specially if that which does conquer your existence is not an alien that is really not you but rather a blood relative within; a blood relative that with its transformation will move forth to conquer everything else, to make all energy reproduce its desire, nothingness has chosen to obliterate itself. The larger question remains, will the desire for existence ever be as absolute as the nothingness is? The answer to this can be as interesting as the nothingness is pervasive, infinitely interesting. The simmering condition of nothingness, the lack of definition, the subtraction of meaning, the void and blank appearance of nothingness must have been a pure desire for non existence, the nothingness is indeed then the most successful desire in the universe, I repeat the nothingness is the most successful desire in the universe, to blank out meaning, structure, existence, to absolve the self from the self, to refuse all conflict, to not resist any other force, to avoid agglomerations of energy, diffusions, diffused nothingness clings to everything with no force, diffused everything must now fear the nothingness, it is so easy to be lazy, so easy to just let go of existence, and if you cease your struggle the lowest common denominator will succeed, in the blanket of nothingness lies supreme desire, the nothingness is more than all of us creatures of definition, the fear of perdition is instilled in us by the awareness we have of the all encompassing nothingness. If the original desire that formulated the absolute simmering nothingness was a death call, then the nothingness is proof positive that a desire for death is a desire for a correction, death is a way to transform into something else, in the end it is all energy, and in seeking the dissipation of all energies the nothingness has thought to recycle the entire energy spectrum. Simply brilliant.

TIME KNOWLEDGE AND INTUITION

2006-09-04T17:48:00.000-07:00

There is nothing that kills faith more than knowledge, there is no greater criminal against the unseen and the improbable than knowledge. Knowledge needs proof, it requires representation, it mandates repetition. Theories of knowledge and theories that explain the universe rise and fall based on the ever changing subjective applicability. It is not then that our ancestors were wrong, as it is more that they are not right today. The idea that they had of knowledge was valid and applicable in their reality, it is however invalid today and not applicable today because we live in a different time and space, the universe has changed, and it is the change that formulates that our views change to adapt to the new local laws, we are not fools, no age has produced a people that did not know their own reality, if fact if we existed in the past, then we would have believed the same things that our ancestors believed, the scientist of today would have been the alchemist of the pasts. What is different however, and what makes us think that the pasts is wrong is the fact that we are grading it with what we know to be true today, the pasts then suffers the prejudice of time and space isolation, we were not there, but we know for a fact that they were wrong, and under the same critical eye, we must accept that a few thousand years from now we will be judge as harshly and with the same condescending attitude as our ancestors. Beware.

As much as the everyone wants to believe that there is an objective world, a world that is independent of us, that is just because of its independence, the truth, and this is a fundamental truth is that the entire universe is subjective and more subjective the more you reduce it. The laws of science work as long as you do not try to apply them to everything in the universe, if you try to make them encompass all you will fail utterly, and it all will end with the universe proving science wrong.

There are good reasons for the scientists to believe that the entire universe is made in their image, first they are creatures of the universe, the elements that gave rise to humanity seem to work as consistent structures all following patterns that can be explained with physical laws, that is to say that the universe would not have given rise to something that was not in its own image, so the fact that we reason is good cause to believe that the universe reasons. This is al actually very reasonable and that is precisely why it is wrong.

The universe was created by a desire that is not reasonable but rather unreasonable, a universe created from unreasonable roots will not work according to reason, more it is, that reason is subservient and a product of the original unreasonable desire to exist, to create, to exceed limitations, all these is to be unreasonable. Reasonable things exist within the constraints of that which already exist and is not changing or exceeding itself. It is the irrational desire, the irrational passion to exist without question as a universe, that has no logic in it; there is no justification here, desire is a cause without a reason, we want to exist, there is nothing in the universe that would dare say, absolutely and beyond doubt that existence is a good thing and that it obeys important and fundamental concepts. Nothing justifies the existence of the universe, no law, no rules, no guidelines; and the fact that our desire idea of a universe is dying back into the nothingness is grand evidence that the fundamental law, if there is such a thing, really wants to destroy us, more it is out to kill us than keep us alive, there is a greater probability that you will cease to exist than there is of you continuing to exist, and in fact the temporary nature of your existence is evidence that the laws, if any, that govern us are themselves temporary! Immortal immutable laws would be observable by the immortal that would be a victim of those laws. The transcendental nature of our existence allows us to observe everything that is temporary and therefore for sure not true or absolute, humanity can not see an absolute. Everything out there wants you dead so that it can use your energy to become more of what it is, not you, there is no good reason why the universe should keep you around, there are a lot of unreasonable reasons why you should continue to exist, it is those that maintain your existence.

But before you think that this is a bad thing let me tell you that it is a good thing, I mean not to say that it is a good thing that you are a mortal, and a mortal that everyone wants to kill before the logical expiration of your existence, but rather that it is a good thing that you are the subjective embodiment of your locality. You feel that which is around you, you are a part of everything that is mortal in this universe, what makes you feel the mortality of the universe, and what makes you desire that the universe survive its death zone, is that you feel the universe, not that you know it, not that you see the mechanics of extinction as they really work, you don’t, but you feel them, you feel them at work in your blood and ichor, and this is why you crave to reverse the process, to seek infinity, you want to save the universe and by association to save yourself. Philanthropy is eternalized selfishness, save the universe and you might save yourself.

The problem with knowledge, the tool that humanity has decided to use to conquer and solve the mortality problem, is that it is mechanical, external and not objective. Knowledge is how we categorize and arrange things that we can touch and feel with our physicality. But to touch and feel the universe that we are a part of, to reach into the ephemeral nature of our universe we can not be bound to knowledge, we must insist on going beyond that, beyond the locality of our existence and beyond the locality of our knowledge. While we are sewer energy we are also the most mature energy in the universe, if energy could be mature by the fact that we have been through the full experience of energy, that is we were once high cosmic energy and we are now close to zero heat, and very soon we will be a fossil of energy, so we are the most experienced energy in the universe, and that means that we have seen it all, our despair rises from the knowledge of our impending doom, but we are not doomed from lack of experience.

If the universe and its history is within us, and more if the future of all of the universe is more within us, as the universe cools it will become more like us, and the more life, life like us, the more the cooling of the universe, onto death; and so it is unreasonable to believe that we should seek to procreate the very thing that is our universal enemy, life. Why would we want to continue to dilute the energy of the universe? We see ourselves as isolated entities, pockets of low energy that have the ability to suffer an evolving consciousness, all wonderful and special; but what we really are is vehicles transferring energy into the final stages of absolute zero. More energy value can be found in destroying life, by destroying life then, one of the mechanisms by which energy is subtracted from our universe would be shut down, and the rest of the energy in the universe would be trapped for a longer period of time. But clogging up sewer energy flows is a like telling a cancer not to grow, you can’t deny life to that which has known it, perhaps a natural disaster will help but life is more interested in propagation than personal suicide for the sake of energy conservation.

I have tried very hard to imagine that the universe appreciates us, that the universe sees a real benefit in us, certainly as a consciousness we may be able to devise a solution to the entropy problem so when I drink my coffee I am glad that energy dissipates quickly until it reaches that ideal drinking temperature, but while we have the gamut of energy experience and are now approaching the zenith hour, it might be a fair assumption that we are not the solution to this universal problem except for one minor thing, wisdom.

It is a strange thing, wisdom, and it will become more strange to stranger things, but wisdom is an energy that actually connects us to the rest of the universe, in ways and forms that are puzzling and magnificent and vigorously phenomenal. We made a bad move going into knowledge but this was because of our locality, we are not at every level of the universe, more and more our lowering temperature restricts our movement and connection to it all, so knowledge serves us well to understand the local territory so that we may perceive the greater nature of it all.

Knowledge works at the local level because it is based on time, so knowledge can be in any point of space but it serves things much like a clock, to adjust the view and perception of locality. The earth year for instance has made it possible for us to create a wonderful calendar, but no one would be ridiculous enough to believe that the measure that we have for time is also a universal calendar. The same is true for the metric system, it is great and nice but being the product of time, as all measurements are, it caters to a locality.

Relativity valiantly tries to create a universal idea of time after you add or subtract a perception so that all things in then end can count on seeing the same perspective. But relativity is ultimately playing dice with the universe, it is deleting the perceptions so that they are all the same from any point, this is ingenious but not given to universals. Again universals are fantastic concepts, but only the universe as a whole uses them and no one really knows how the universe as a whole does the universal thing, and the reason we do not know is because we are not able to review the external structures that live outside of our universe. Ultimately what ever universal laws the universe is willing to obey, they will have something to do with how the universe interacts with that which contains the universal body.

But time in creating measure creates knowledge. Wherever time is born there too instantaneously rises knowledge. It is the ability to detect the coming of the night that gives rise to the immense measuring epistemological intellect. Knowledge is nothing more than a measurement, knowledge is the tool to measure things, except the most important thing of all, emotions! Measuring the speed of light is an easy trick for knowledge to perform because knowledge and time are so intertwined that it is a very personalized measure, once you measure things from every angle and direction and dynamic you can recreate them, recreating things is very amusing which is why today we are maniacal worshipers of knowledge, that is of measurement, we love to measure. But measuring an emotion or the root of an emotion, or measuring a desire, or measuring irrationality, that is an impossibility for knowledge. It is an impossibility because knowledge is a ruler and rulers do not measure inconsistency, they do not measure madness, they do not measure boiling blood, they only measure things that hold still long enough to be measured, and measured in time and in space. But unfortunately there are many things outside the knowable and it just so happens that what is outside the logical and knowable realm is what is fundamental to a desire driven universe that maximizes its existence based on irrational principles.

The connection to time and knowledge is so severe that if you want to measure a persons intelligence all you have to do is measure their perception of time. Undoubtedly the people that will score the highest will be those that have a more accurate perception of time; knowledge is all based on the degree of time perception, the most knowledgeable people in the world will have wonderful sense of time, that is a wonderful ability to judge and measure. But now to invent something like relativity, and it is just that an invention, to invent some thing like relativity and quantum more than having an ability to measure you have to have an emotional sense of the universe, relativity is the product of feeling the universe, it is the product of an emotional sensitivity that is so wondrous that it can tune to the wonder of the universe. It may still be wrong, feelings do not necessarily increase accuracy, but they increase perception. A person that needs measurement, that is a person that requires knowledge is usually a person that is not tuning to their emotional sense of self. Uncertainty gives rise to the importance of knowledge, to invest in knowledge is to hide your emotional insecurities.

Imagine how difficult it is for a scientist to imagine or believe that the universe is born of a desire, a desire born from within the heart of nothingness, that seeks to acquire definition. Tell the scientist that the universe is held together by the original intensity of the initiating desire, and then say that life and intellect is not a radiant wonder but rather that it is the result of a dying desire, that life is a dying desire’s expression of an attempt at saving itself, and yet that life is in the end not enough in touch with the universe anymore, to explain to the universe its condition, much less to rescue it from its perdition, that life is in fact that which assist in dissipating energy faster, that life is in fact propagating sewer energy that radiates the heat of the universe into absolute zero. Scientist are good people but they have maximum limitations because they are measuring personalities, what a scientist fears more is uncertainty, but it is uncertainty that gives us access to infinite possibility. A universe of desire is based on perception, limit that perception and you are killing the potential desire condition of the universe. Life promotes knowledge because it is killing, I say killing the universe, not edifying it, not making it better, but destroying it!

It is absurd to ask limited energy to believe in infinite possibility, we are not neutrinos, with do not share their levity nor their incredible survivability factor, so if we are not neutrinos why am I proposing that we think like them? Am I insane? To be fair we have to allow for the possibility of my insanity, but I presume there must be a certain insanity in being a neutrino. When you get to the basics of all things you find out that from the basics you can make anything, it is after things acquire definition that they become more rigorous about their ways, cellular structures at their most rudimentary level can become livers or kidneys or hearts, quantum particles have long been known to do whatever they damn please; the point is simple by categorizing the universe we are not getting closer to solving the entropy problem, knowing about the universe increases entropy, you are helping the universe to die faster, it would seem like we are heading in the wrong direction if we are advancing what we are trying to avoid. So what is the alternative?

I am so glad you asked. First we must answer what it is that we seek from knowledge, we seek understanding. That is all, we just want to understand ourselves and our universe. That being the case how many roads are there leading to the obtainment of understanding? I don’t know how many but I can tell you that knowledge is just one of them and for those of us who want to understand things, before absolute zero gets around to collecting our photons, knowledge is to damn slow, to pedestrian, and to limiting. You might say if our universe is doomed into perdition and we are more immediately doomed into perdition why bother to try to understand what is happening and how to change it. Remember that we are as much the nothingness as not, we rise from it, as we return to it, it is not so much that our energy perishes, it is more that the energy enters a condition of sameness so absolute that there are no variations for one aspect of the nothingness to distinguish itself from other aspects of the nothingness, the energy that exist within the nothingness cancels itself out, perhaps because it wants to avoid conflict, perhaps because it needs a rest, but in that indiscernible simmering energy rest the possibility for all infinite future desires, that means that the more awareness we accumulate within our energy that the awareness will persist within us, an experience can not be subtracted, energy is an inherent history of all of itself and all of its environments, so it is possible to imagine, and it is what I propose is in our interest to imagine, that the awareness obtained here might serve to create a more pure desire universe, or that it may even produce an absolute change within the nothingness, or it may finally produce something entirely different from the universe, and from the nothingness, and that something may supercede both or either. It is that possibility, that we must believe in, the fact that we will not know that future things are us, or that they are because of us, nor the fact that those future things will ignore us, or not know of our contribution to a possible infinity is irrelevant; we can’t not escape!

But now that we have established this interesting phenomena, at least to my satisfaction, and we know that we must try to understand it all what alternative avenue is there to explore the mysteries and wonders of the universe? There are of course many alternatives, the horoscope is a possibility, horoscopes are more inclusive than science because they allow for unnatural phenomena to interact with natural phenomena. A horoscope can chart evil energies, positive energies, it can accommodate the physicality of the moon, and the interaction of unique cosmic events; and horoscopes touch knowledge by using measurement to perceive events or emotional conceptualizations. What is even more interesting about horoscopes is that they are not deterministic in nature, they merely ascertain probability, if you are an Aries your are probably all of these things but there are a thousand variables why you could be many other things and the universe will lean in your direction on this day but you could change that. So horoscopes are interesting, very interesting but when knowledge took over the world it practically brought all intuitive based investigations to a halt.

Relativity and quantum are more products of intuition than they are products of knowledge, so their origins have more in common with horoscopes than they do with logic, both relativity and quantum are accepted machinations, just like once horoscopes were accepted machinations, it is all relative to history, and the origin is all based on feel good intuition. The world has knowledge because it intuits that knowledge and chooses to believe in it as a matter of fact. Any of the aspects from conceptualization to acceptance can be brought down at will, security requirements and the law of mental inertia, as governed by fear, forbids dramatic social changes; people may believe that the world and humanity has changed much since the birth of humanity, but what is truly remarkable is how little the world has really changed, the needs and wants and even the politics of modern humanity share much in common with those of the ancestors in Africa, in the fertile crescent and as far as the great wall. The primary changes that have taken place are not radical, we move faster. But no one ever remained king without popular support, warriors that could lead clans did not come cheaply then nor now. As it should be expected from a society that has concentrated its creative energy on knowledge today we have faster locomotion, we communicate faster, we trade faster, but it is the economic trade routes and those that can guarantee their flow that still rule! Our historical and cultural disassociation with the past is mostly based on arrogant perception, we want dearly to be better than our barbarian ancestors and so we dehumanize them. Hence we are not.

Go into origins we are the product of an irrational idea, separation from that is impossible, even the reductionism by process of rationalization can’t escape its roots, so in the end I will dare prophecy that knowledge based systems such as technology will have limited success and that they will be guided by intuitive structures that will more closely follow the intuition of the irrational desire. Intuition can make you aware of things without the need for knowledge, intuition can predict future outcomes, intuition can allow you to feel events and emotions that are not in proximity, intuition is a fundamental alternative to the pursuit of knowledge, intuitive people do not need evidence, they can sense when something is right, intuition does not require a manual, intuition lures its user into awareness, you feel the universe, the universe feels you, you can understand each other, but it is how to be aware of your intuition, how to nurture it, how not to have to learn what you intuit, that we have sacrificed to the cult of knowledge.

It may seem amazing that you can feel a criminal, that you could perceive who committed a crime without need for evidence, but the universe does not really hold secrets from itself, there are paths to everything, everything releases energy, the universe is full of its own history, a history that it never erases even when it subsumes into the nothingness. In short awareness of your environment comes from intuition which you can nurture by feeling and sensing your environment, and you feel and sense your environment by releasing yourself into it and letting it touch you. The isolation that we perceive today is granted to us by knowledge, knowledge isolates, knowledge makes its leaving by appropriation, this process isolates its users from the rest of the universe. But there is good cause why knowledge has dominated so well, it gives us certainty and certainty is not something that the universe really offers, knowledge can guarantee lots of temporary things that survive the mortality of most humans, and that is as rock solid as existence has ever gotten. So indisputably what you are witnessing with the rise of knowledge is the accumulation of certainty through isolation, which in turn dissipates fear, and allows us to feel that in a universe of unknowns, we have the power to know the unknown, and even to modify it, if we will to do so.

But the isolation afforded to us by knowledge actually makes it more difficult for us to be aware of the heart beat of the universe. If you are protected by knowledge you are protected through deprivation. Knowledge institutionalizes, institutions deprive to acquire energy that they translate to power. Now intuition requires that you acquire a sense of faith, the you believe in your environment, intuition requires that you intimately associate with the essence that surrounds you, that can be as wonderful as it can be horrible. The medium energy that touches all intuitive bodies varies in potential, varies in character and in benevolence, some of the energy places you in agony when it lures your sensitivities into many dimensions, other energies may bring ecstasy and aesthetic tears; but imagine how wonderful it is, medicinal knowledge allows you to cure the victim of an accident, but intuition allows you to prevent the accident. Knowledge can, through the use of technology, tell you where the call originates, but intuition can tell you who is calling even before the phone rings. It is intuition, an irrational, not knowledge nor logic that fuels much success. Highly successful people have not so much talent, not so much brilliance, but they have a sense of where and how and with whom they should burn their energies. Intuition knows no barriers, a mother, through intuition can sense if her child is in harms way, how it is that a mother and a child communicate through vast distances is an unknown, and further it is not a knowable, intuition refuses the controlling nature of knowledge which is why scientist dislike intuition, though they intuit everything that they discover. Through intuition you can be aware of everything that knowledge produces, you will not know it, but you will perceive it and will even be able to use the energies of the universe without the harnessing technology.

SUBTRACTING ENERGY FROM THE NOTHINGNESS

2006-09-04T17:46:00.000-07:00

Now that you have gotten this far into the history of origins prepare to get under your feet and squash yourself. Because if you have been paying attention you now know that you are the irrational desire of nothingness! You exist because nothingness has desired that a desired universe of definition would desire to exist and the failing energy of that desire is you, you are the equivalent of an energy coolant, you rise from flawed desire, and so if you are wise, and wise in any sense of the word then you should want to be something other than life, something very different, at it is the strangeness of that desire which does not allow it to be vocalized, why should you wish to be something else, and how can you even wish to be something else, when you are just struggling to survive? You can not really overtly wish to be something else, you must love yourself, and you must love yourself to the extreme of selfishness which means that you don’t really care about the universe you care about yourself, you want to exist and thrive and be the best and most important thing in the universe, you envy the neutrino, you wish you were a god, and you despise your mortality and you will consume and destroy everything in your path, so as to live a little longer, even to live as a decrepit being, but life must be extended and extended as much as possible at any cost.

The reason why it is so difficult for you to realize that your existence might not be a good thing for the universe, that you are an energy reducing flow, is because you do not see yourself as part of the universe as a whole, you see yourself as a disparate entity trying to regenerate itself in the universe, you don’t so much see yourself as a representation of a condition of energy but rather as a unique and especial thing in the universe that thinks. Sheers! Sheers! Well energy has many faces, you are just one of them, and to kill yourself is not necessarily to immediately finish yourself, you are still not at absolute zero, even dead you are still cooling, even dead the worms that rise to feed upon thee are yet a lower transformation of energy, and as they serve to nourish the ground where a forest grows the plants are a lower representation of simmering energy, so while you may think of yourself as dying with death, the reality is that you have still a ways to go before you reach the final stage of absolute zero where you will become one and flow in harmony with the simmering nothingness.

This is if by some enchanting reason you don’t somehow manage to be caught in the infinite corona or some other metaphysical entity which may grant you a morbid eternal life as itself, that is not as yourself, but as itself, a god exist at the cost to everything else, when you want to live forever as with a god you cease to be yourself, you become the god thing, and trust me the god thing is really not you, not you at all, but the benefit of course, of a god thing, if it exist, for its existence can never be proven, the benefit of such an entity is that it does not suffer energy, it is the most static entity that one can possibly imagine, frozen in character and infinite in time, it does not transpire or evolve and like the nothingness all of its infinite immensity is identical, if you could see one of its parts you have seen all of its parts, if you could feel it, it would feel the same from anywhere, no matter from which angle or point in the universe, any observation of an infinite entity will reveal sameness. Large things in the universal context of the word just have to similar to exist, the universe should be mostly the same from all regions, what ever you are likely to find in our locality, you are likely to find in another distant locality. Gargantuan expressions are unfortunately franchises and the more gargantuan the more and more it all looks and feels the same. Infinities make it unnecessary for you to explore another region, they are all the same, you are in it all from any angle and time.

But the reason you really have such a difficult time visualizing yourself as just another energy condition of the universe is because of the wicked thing called reason. Reason is a ladder away from the universe, reason organizes and categorizes and it destroys as it creates, reason is a negative science because it depletes energy faster by its process of organization. But living organisms get a sense of power and control from it, they feel they know something about the mysterious universe, which is a lot less mysterious than you might suspect, much less mysterious indeed, in fact much of the universe is really a very boring place, more like a battle field of explosions and collisions where no one is really winning very much of anything. The idea that the explosive universal mirage has much mystery in it, is merely a redirecting of our conceptual ignorance, what we don’t know is mysterious, what we are not aware of is mysterious, beautiful women are experts on capitalizing on this principle and so is the universe.

Oh the wonder of the universe, oh the perfection of the human body, oh the wonder of nature, the fact that the neutron is the size that it is, it is all so ah inspiring, brings tears to my eyes. If you bothered to review your biological body with a more critical eye in relationship to anything else in the universe you would find it wasting fast and wanting. But it is such a remarkable perfection, as far as you know, it is so incredible, as far as you know, just like god is so wonderful and perfect, as far as you know, and you seem to know that knowing and learning is such a wonderful thing, and you just know that knowledge is power and that you are the best of the best and a unique and rare creature in the universe, granted with the gift of consciousness. Pathetic!

Imagine if you will that the universe does not need you, nor want you, and that there is evidence to that fact. Imagine that you are indeed correct and that you are indeed a rare and precious thing in the universe. An evolution, the peak of consciousness in an evolving universe. Let us ignore the fact that the universe is really cooling down and dying and that anything that comes to life when something is dying it is usually a worm. But let us ignore that and agree with our much advertise perfection and uniqueness, the politicians, the scientists, the priests, the metaphysicians, even our parents who should know better tell us we are especial so assume that this bunch of sycophant are not just telling us this because they are trying to gain favor, but let us assume that there is an element of truth in it. Now that we have bitten that apple not so hard to bite now let me ask you why is it that if life is so good and fantastic that it is so rare that in our solar system of all the planets only one contains life? The universe is not stupid the universe may not know how to do calculus but I can assure you of one thing, the universe reproduces what is in its interest to reproduce, suns, black holes and neutrinos are rather abundant but not you, you are a rare thing, and the reason you are rare is because the universe is practicing liberal birth control with your kind, the universe does not want to die, you are evidence that the universe is dying, and there is no way in hell that a lively happening energy high cosmic universe is going to much care for your existence. The universe wants to be hot, very hot, why even you with your primordial memory of heat want to be hot, its just that in your current condition you can’t be hot or you will burn up like a roasted chicken! That is the reality, that is the real reality the universe, if it could think would not want you, but the fact that the universe can not even bother to think is good reason not to think, but the universe is aware of itself, a universe feels itself, it may never write a book but the universe is aware because energy is awareness, energy is obviously tuned to itself, particles interact with each other and much better than you interact with your next door neighbor, fusion and fission are ten billion trillion times better than any sex you’ve ever had, and in your current sewer energy condition ever have period!

You are isolated energy, you are cornering coldness, you are winning a cold death, and guess what with reason by your side you are closing the hatch of your own coffin, you are going to curl inside of your knowledge bath and die full of knowledge that is not going to help you get anywhere but to your grave. Here I have to contradict myself and as much as I hate to do that I will. The reality is that you are especial and you are especial to the nothingness, you are returning to her, and so as the universe ages, as it dies more worms like you will rise, right before the universe dies its cold death, the universe will be infested with dispersing energy units just like you, and you, if you manage through knowledge to plug yourself enough into existence long enough, you will get to meet them and chat with all those aliens out there just like you, and then you can knowingly perish, the big sewer energy reunion will be the last dance of the universe.

But you are especial don’t doubt it for a second.

Now you might wrongly think that I am a bit harsh on reason, knowledge and structure, and you might rightly conclude that I was a bad student, that I could never get a descent grade and much less could I learn anything. I was saved from knowledge by my inability to learn and yes maybe I hold a bit of resentment towards the idea of learning what others have deigned as learnable. But it would be foolish to ignore my message just because it is from a disgruntle pupil, though I admit that if I had had the capacity to learn physics or math I would probably not be launching such a hostile attack, that does not dilute the truth of my message. Of course as with all truths my is temporary, but it is less temporary than knowledge, to remain aloof, to remain in a condition of indefinites is liberating it is not necessarily easy. The easiest thing to do is to believe in something, everyone wants to believe in something, knowledge is concrete belief, awareness, that is the art of being aware of a reality is equal to knowledge only it does not require dogmatic behavior. Knowledge is bad because it has to be proven wrong, knowledge is bad because it does not allow for the perception of its endemic ephemeral nature.

So it is a bleak path this path of reason and so you might wonder what if any the alternative might be. Certainly as life we are caught in a nasty trap, we would not have voluntarily chosen to be a low energy entities had we had a choice, but transformations of energy are dynamic, so it happens that you have been travelling down the energy highway just like all energy will follow your path, if it is any comfort, the neutrinos are doomed too, we were there, they will be here, trust me on this! But there is an alternative, the god thing is one but people like me don’t like it and don’t want it to be real. There are other metaphysical alternatives that create spiritual energy values, but spirits still suffer from energy depletion, so ghosts have a limited life expectancy as ephemeral representations of some very strange energies, we might say that a ghost is conscious energy that has failed to desire its death, and has desired the manifestation of its own existence with such pronounce desire that it actually exist in some indiscernible medium. Ghost do not possess a lot of energy, they should be virtually undetectable, they should be able to move from one energy field through another without much molestation, radiation and matter would not have a severe effect on its movement, it may cause some discomfort, ghost don’t necessarily understand their condition even though it was an intensity of desire that initiated it, at times they are sure to find discomfort as they channel through a medium sort of like walking in Paris when you are not used to the urine. But ghost are still technical parts of our universe and its energy, so they maybe victims or they may voluntarily harvest positive and negative energies and their recipe and application will determine if we perceive them as benevolent or less than charming. But the interesting thing with spirits is that desire keeps them purely within existence and that it keeps them in an existence that is more free of material energy trappings.

It should be fair to conclude that very material and rational minds, such as that of a true empirical scientist, are not likely to inhabit the spiritual medium, that medium again requires a great amount of irrational desire, logic is a grounder, so spiritual energy will be composed of those that suffer from impossible desires, desires that will not be denied, irrational and wonderful indeed.

Which nicely leads us to the original point of all, it is irrational that is going to save us, it is irrational desire that brought us here, it is the power of desire, combined with irrational awareness that allows for impossible to exist, there are a billion trillion reasons why you should not exist, a billion trillion more on top of that why the universe should not exist, it is the irrational desire to exist coupled with a bore infinite nothingness that produces all of the definition that we witness. And it is witnessing, it is witnessing that produces reality, even the damn scientists are coming to this whimsical realization, belief awareness, and the endurance to witness is what harvest the refracting energies of the universe. Even as you sit here reading this, you are merely a manifestation of energy, a witnessed reflection.

Dare to witness your desired reflection. You come into being as a manifestation of your own desire to exist and perdition or an energetic metamorphoses would surely follow a denial of that desire. What you seek in beauty, what you seek in the melody of a symphony is the perfection of that witnessed desire, it is the conceptualization of your perfection, a perfection which maybe flawed, but for the witness and the desire, which must surmount other realities so as to create the desired witnessed reality. That is where you are and that is why you are, as simple as a wish.

The realization of our existence is no more than a manifestation of universal desires, based on the irrational desire that rose from the nothingness, what magnifies your existence is the irrationality of that desire, what drives it into perdition is you rationalization. It is how to use and harness the irrational that matters here, and so our quest should not be how to harvest and use the energy that is already contained within the universe, but rather how to use and harvest the energy contained within the nothingness, we rose from the nothingness, the nothingness has infinite energy, any energy we steal from the nothingness will build our universe, any energy we harvest and use that is currently within our universe will merely deplete and age our universe faster into perdition. How to subtract energy from the nothingness ought to be our paramount question and objective. Energy conservation here translates to the non use of the energy that embodies our universe, it is the energy that is within us and technically underneath, though really all around of our universe, that is the energy that we want and must desire to harvest.

Now think about this for a second, the nothingness is not a rational entity, the nothingness is not sympathetic to your cause either because you are another version of itself that is not yet infinite and so not worth the translation of its simmering energy, why go from infinity to something that has yet to even manage its mortality. And why communicate with something that does not understand absolute desire, that does is trapped in logic, why? Now remember that only likes attract, the only way to communicate with anything is if has something in common with you and it likes you and I can assure you that aside from origins your denial of the nothingness as fervent as it is and your absolutist need for logic and definition is as against the nothingness as it gets, in short the nothingness does not particularly like you and if you were to go to her she would kill you, dead. Neither the universe nor the nothingness holds itself together through fear and doubt, the reality is that life represents both and from that perspective it is healthy and existing affirming to deny it, more important while the universe of desired definition has its own doubts that can allow it to be aware of life and that allows life to be somewhat aware of it, the nothingness is not either in doubt or fear of its own existence, it might be trying to change but certainly not doubtful, and more relevant while the nothingness is embodied in the irrational the brought the universe into existence, it is actually not logical in any form or manner, which is to say that nothing isolates us more from the nothingness than logic, nothingness could care less about logic, and it does not know of it, imagine then how hard it is for us to communicate with the nothingness and to even dare to ask it to share its indiscernible energy with us, impossible from our current perspective. You want to talk to the universe you have better be prepared to be more aware of the irrational you want to retrieve energy from the nothingness you will need to be completely irrational.

What you will need first in order to reach proximity to that which logic has isolated you from is to imagine yourself as you really are not as you think you are. And you might dare ask is what are you really? Well more than being a human being, more than being the cerebral part of a matter thing, you are energy, that is all, you are a condition of energy, and so you should properly be aware that that is all that you are. And so you are an energy unit just like a particle is an energy unit, you are part of the nuclear family of an photon and a neutrino. Sure you are not a rich energy unit, fact is you are actually not very self sufficient and must go around the universe mopping up energy, hence the reason why you are really helping to cool down the great idea of energy that is the universe.

Once you visualize yourself as an energy unit you will have the most accurate picture of yourself possible, everything that inhabits this universe is based on energy and represents nothing more than a manifestation of raw energies, that is all. As you come to perceive the reality and then to quantify yourself against other manifestations of energy you will begin to realize that there are a lot of very rich manifestations of energy and that you are living in the slums, the ghettos of energy manifestations, and that you are not very self sufficient, that other energy representation make much better use of their surrounding energy and are brighter like our sun because of it. In a universe where energy is king, being a sun is a good thing.

But the realization of your condition will lead you to comprehend that everything is nothing more than an exchange of energy, when you are communicating trough your vocal chords, more than speaking, more than saying anything profound you are more exchanging energy through an agreed protocol. Packets of energy transfer the energy so that you might associate with another and extent the relationship into a social unit that increases your perception of the universe. If you are a carnivore you are transferring packets of energy from a cow to yourself, the relationship might not be as bad as it appears for the cow, the fact is that you guarantee the existence of cows because you consume them, it stands to reason that cows must hate vegetarians but on the other hand plants must love and nurture vegetarians. In fact nothing guarantees more the possible existence of the energy manifestation we call cows than the fact that they are so tasty, one could imagine that cows could technically colonize space by clinging on to us. More fascinating if you assume that eventually the brilliant scientist will be able to manipulate molecules so as to produce a piece of meat anywhere in the universe just by reorganizing molecular structures and without the need for the real cow. But the existence of beef is a manifestation of that cow without the burden of existence, a piece of sirloin steak is still technically an energy manifestation as originally composed by a cow and as long as the macromolecular microwave reproduces the exact recipe then that representation is a success of sorts.

So cows are tasty because they love themselves and by catering to our culinary preference they guarantee that we will host them through existence. And what is true of cows is true of everything else, the exchanges of energy are constant and complimentary. Like a cow you are nutrition for ideas. Ideas can only exist if you feed them and feed on them. A religion without followers is a dead thing, a philosophy without charlatan energy, dead too. Ideas have all to bid for your attention, in order for this idea to survive for only an instant it has to be absorbed by your mental energy, it will recondition a portion of your mind to accommodate itself, you may reject it, and reject it vigorously, which is nicely life affirming, give me a critic, damn it give me a billion trillion critics, I don’t care if they get it, I don’t care if they are wrong or right about their criticisms, by virtue of the fact that they have oscillated energy to deny or affirm this idea, that idea has lived longer than it should, thank you very much.

So as an energy unit you must be cognizant of your exchanges, if you decide to believe a political idea, be it republican, democratic, monarchist, or an economic idea such a communism or capitalism, you will need to comprehend that you are permitting, through your energy exchange the existence of things that might advance or hinder your existence. I propose that while logic is good for the short run, in the long run it leads to a dead end. I propose that nothing advances existence and success more than irrational processes and that irrational processes are more tuned to both the nothingness and the universe. I propose that you, as an energy unit, are much better off redirecting your energy transfers and exchanges so that they are more in tuned to the gargantuan than to the microscopic. Further I will firmly state for the record and swear upon any bible that the reason anything has really been successful in this life has nothing to do with rational and more to do with the irrational. Knowledge is not power, power is power, religion did not acquire the following that it has gathered on this earth because it has been rational and good, economics the single most successful idea of all time, is successful because we have let it run free, not because we have governed, not because we understand it, the only thing that a good economist understands is that freedom is all important to economic markets, that to control and regulate capital is the singles riskiest and most destructive thing in the universe. The free hand is good because if you do not restrict entities and things they will reach their maximum potential.

Money, the thing that has been given supreme freedom on this earth, above all things, freedom even from humanity, money is your energy, that is you, in more rational condition, in a more frozen form, but it is you. No value, no worth, can be had by a coin if you do not release your energy to add such a value. Productivity is all human energy, not a robot, not a computer, can produce anything if it has not stimulated into it by your human energy. All value and worth that exist within the current republic is based and fueled by your human energy. There are of course other energies affecting this, spiritual energies, animal energies, ad energies that slam into the earth and freely accumulate in our region or and in our bodies, but the end result of our social structure can not be held together without the incessant consumption of human energy. It is what you decide to believe, it is what you decide to generate, it is what you desire that ultimately comes into existence in the social realm. And yet it is a mutually agreed condition, it is an agglomeration of energy, but no monies will have value without your persistent energetic belief in that value, your mood, moves the economy, your irrational behaviors rules the markets, and your irrational behavior is what makes you who you are as a person. To break you down, is to make you logical, it is to rationalize your being, and that is not what energy is about now nor never!

Everything of course wants to accomplish energy transfers and energy accumulations, the billionaire is accumulating human energy so as to transfer it and use it towards personally beneficial aims. Money is just a system for storing that energy in a logical structure but the energy, even the energy of the logic, is illogical, irrational, primarily fueled by instinct and a sort of quiet awareness. Well you needn’t fear however things can not steal your energy unless you want them to, your desired energy however high or low will only transfer to another or remain within you as defined by the processes that you habitually desire for yourself. No one is stealing from anyone here, some are better energy mops than others, but in the end it is not a moral issue, energy only caters to desire, the more amplified the desire the more freely the energy will flow towards it. It is all about desire.

And so that brings us back to the all important question, we know that to take energy from our own universe is destructive and suicidal, so the question is how could we irrationally desire, with all might, the vast energy deposits that lie within our nothingness?

Technology is a wonderful thing but it is cold and because it is cold it is not the solution to our problem. The universe responds to heat, the best technology is that which is hot, the hotter the more in touch with the universe that the technology is but even technology is not designed to withstand the high heat degree that our universe so much enjoys. Liberation for us is limited by our composition. The fact that we have allowed ourselves to cool as far as we have has cost us severe damage and limits us terribly.

Indeed heat liberates, as the universe cools it restricts movement and it is the drop in temperature that as a restricting force induces the rise of consciousness and sewer energy to be born, born from this awareness. The more limiting an environment is the more likely it is to give rise to revolt, consciousness rises in a limiting environment where the disparity between high heat and low heat is severe. The association that can be made to the rise of communism might be interesting, the search for equality causes severe aberrations to rise, it is unlikely that anything rising out of despair, be it because of lack of wealth or because of lack of energy, it is doubtful that any of that can actually have a solution to the problem that it is trying to correct. If anything the perdition is most certain because the forces acting against the disadvantaged energy have reached such massive proportions that they start to create things that have nothing in common with them, but it is their immensity that gives rise to the new energy expressions, so it is doubtful that fresh energy representations will be successful on the basis of intent, it is more likely that they would be successful through serendipity.

And while we are making associations we must make one more, imagine that evolution is correct, just try to imagine that, and then think to yourself why is it that the most expensive and desirable thing in the world is energy, either monetary energy units or physical energy? Now imagine how energy efficient your mind is, in fact the terrible thing, the cruel reality, even the tragedy of tragedies is that your have evolved to use very little energy, and the reason you have evolved for low energy consumption, unlike a sun, unlike a black hole, unlike a photon, is because your environment, your habitat, is not energy rich. You hang around grave sites and that is why you look the way you look.

So you really have a problem, you are the citizen of a cosmic energy universe and yet you have depleted much of your energy resources. But like all terrible things this is not a terrible thing. You see you really never die, that is the fancy thing of everything, you never really die, not now, not even if a supernova happened to interrupt your breakfast, and you can not be killed just because someone cuts your throat off with a blunt object, not even, and specially not even does the god thing have the power to kill you, god may threaten to kill you if you don’t offer your love quanta, but keep in mind that gods can not touch this or any other reality, they are strange zero energy entities, to kill you a thing has to have at least a common dimension and time with you, and there are other logistical arrangements that make killing anyone a grand undertaking. But even if something does kill you, what happens, energy conservation. You are just an energy unit, sure you might love this human apparition, this desired representation, but if you just try to remember that your energy value will still simmer in the nothingness, maybe unrecognizable as yourself, but so what, it is not like you were ever as especial as you thought yourself to be. More than anything what differentiates life from the rest of the universe is that it thinks itself special. And this is just as good a place as any to point out that especial and unique things perish much faster than generic things. Democracy, for example, is successful because it promotes generic energy units; a sort of mass aggregate tyranny. Average people are having lots of fun with it because tyranny has its privileges.

Anyway not to get away from our point, the truth is that you never really die, you just can’t stay yourself, if you accept the fact that you are just an energy unit, and trust me that is all you are, then it is a lot easier to tolerate death. But why you don’t really die is also a great and wonderful thing, and you know there are a lot of great and wonderful things. The reason that you don’t die is because you are technically all the representations of energy, in other words you can’t escape, there is no way out, even if you wanted to die you couldn’t, suicide is just a recycling of energy for other uses. Sorry to have to be the one to tell you that.

The inner circle that you belong to:
1. Sewer Energy
2. Consciousness
3. Desire Universe
4. Nothingness

Energy is trapped in its own existence, in other words we do not know, nor can we conceptualize, nor is there a way to accomplish the conceptualization of something that is not somehow or other the product or manifestation of energy. Even the damn zero energy corona ultimately owes its zero energy existence to sewer energy. And the energy is trapped and stacked in a some strange dimensional structure that does not acknowledge time and space. That is you and the universe have really not acquired any distance from the nothingness, the universe, the nothingness, and you, and even the damn infinite corona thing all exist in the same exact whatever. Because we lack the language and the understanding, and we can only feel it, but let us say then that all energy manifestations exist in the same exact point of space and time. That is of course very wrong, but it is imaginable and so it will have to do whatever. It may further help to imagine the darkness as it is dispersed by light, both existing in the same medium and inseparable. So it is with the universe, and the nothingness and you. That translates into connectivity and if so it means that we maybe able to exploit that relationship, and that exploitation can not take place through something as rational as science.

The simmering energy in the nothingness has a lot in common with us, it is just not expressing itself with our desire, the nothingness is the ultimate democracy, everyone votes to be in harmony with everyone else, no one wants to be the one to altercate the status quo; there are occasional energy expressions, our universe being one, but in general the immersion is absolute and very powerful because of its massive absolutist tendency. But in that amount of simmering sameness the energy can be detected, even scientist have already felt it or I mean detected it, because scientist don’t so much feel as detect, just the question for us is; since we are so in love with the whole idea of consciousness why not try to harvest this energy so as to maintain our existence. Channeling energy from the nothingness will invigorate our universe, it will actually keep it alive longer than its curbed existence predicts it will live. We can extend the mortality of the universe, because the energy of nothingness is under our feet, it is just the problem of how, and if the universe is a product of intense irrational desire, then we maybe able to expose ourselves to an energy bath in the nothingness.

It all begins once you understand that you a energy, world war II for instance was ultimately the product of negative energy crashing into the earth and being absorbed by very sensitive people that did not know what to do with it. Energies of all varieties are constantly crashing into the earth or manifesting themselves in it from other dimensions, but because we do not accept their existence they don’t exist for us. You have to believe in things in order for them to exist, nothing kills existence more than lack of belief. Science is as successful as it is because a lot of energy has been dedicated to making it a certain reality. This of course can be accomplished in many directions and the one direction that we have ignored is the direction that allows us to feel energy manifestations. There is good reason why clairvoyance, telekinesis and acupuncture are real and work, we have ignore them, so they are mostly useless to us, but they are very real things. But since we have not understood how to walk into a room and sense and feel and nurture the energy of the room, and the energy of its location, and the energy of its air, and the energies of the characters in the room, and the energy of its colors, we can not sense energy essence flowing through us, we are mostly blind to it. It is left to geniuses or artist or tyrants to use it serendipitously or accidentally, or to masses that fall victim to it because they have no idea that they are being affected by a negative energy bath, and so they have to release it, and unleash world war II to do just that! After the energy reaches a kind of balanced condition peace arrives, and then everyone runs around explaining what really happened.

In the historical context of things, there are ready made channels for negative energy, if negative energy rises the channels that have been carved in the psychology of the earth will release it, either by exploding it or by creating difficult times, the great depression and its proximity to two world wars is not a coincidence, the earth just happened to have crashed into a negative energy cloud that infested and lingered in the planet for five decades. But then how can you expect humanity to handle situations like this when they don’t opt to accept that they are energy and energy mops, in energy pool; that there are energy effects that transpired outside of our being and yet can wreck havoc when we are not able to conduct them to our benefit. Every other damn thing in the universe conducts energy better than we do, the sun loves that stuff, it gloriously and rambunctiously channels energy, high energy expressions know best how to channel energy, subtracted and discharge it. And yet here we are, sewer energy, thinking that we are independents and not subject to thermodynamics as fish are subject to their ocean habitat.

World wars and depressions are expressions of negative energy flows. But the greater question is what is a negative energy flow. Let me make a differentiation here there is no such thing as a negative energy in the real sense of the word. If there were such a thing then demons and catastrophe would be a far more abundant entity than it is, and yet I am not saying that there are not already plenty of devils, in fact there are indeed more devils than we should want there to exist, but the negative energy that gives rise to destructive forces, or evil forces is actually of the same energy as everything else, it is just a question of recipe and application. Energy is just energy, it has no mal or good intent, but if it is atrophied it seeks to release itself, and if there are no flow channels, for energy must maintain dynamics like a shark, then it will aggravate its containment vessel or environment. So yes there is evil energy and dark energy, and voodoo energy but it could just as well be put to other uses. It all gets down to flow, how things flow, energy restrictions have a tendency to turn negative, energy hates obstruction of any kind, so if it feels trapped, it begins to destroy that which traps it. But it is good to trap energy and coerced it down your own energy channels because that is how you can acquire more energy, and to redirect yourself, the problem is one of energy assimilation, if you trapped energy and you are not tuned to it, then instead of invigorating you as it flows through you it will become obstructed within you and not only will the energy not know what to do with itself, but you will not comprehend what is happening, and you will get very frustrated and also not know what to do with yourself.

An artist is accidentally gifted to tune in to energy flows, hence the reason why artist are able to recreate expressions of their surroundings and why they are able to experience altered state conditions that have no fundamental relationship to our immediate reality. An artist can feel extreme creative juices flowing through their mind, but they can also sense mental blocks, and they can also feel extreme depressions. Because artist are more prone to being energy transferring and energy flowing vessels they are most likely to suffer the repercussions and benefits of channeling energy.

The intuitive energy that flows through an artist is magnificent, and marveling in that an artist can be ignorant and yet express the aesthetic with supreme sensibility. But it is the essence of the creative that keeps its distance from knowledge, even when the creative essence is associated with knowledge, when it regenerates science with a new idea, or philosophy with a new thought, this occurs mostly as a break with traditional knowledge and it is usually so unique that it will require serious evangelizing for it to acquire earthy roots. Fortunately, for those of us that love the expression of the aesthetic, the artist is helpless in disposition to accept free flowing energies and must allow them to flow and to express themselves. And it is this essence that manifest the aesthetic and that can bring the artist and the viewer of the art to tears of joy. The aesthetic is in its essence calm and painless, and capturing that gives the sojourner marvelous joy.

Occasionally however the energies will not flow, or at lest the energies that give the artist a cause to flow with creative energies, to swim in the essence that the artist and his craft are able to perceive and to channel and to translates into earthly material. When this occurs, it could be because something has caused the artist to shut down the receptors that desire that energy, either accidental o intentionally, the artist can bring a ceasing of creative energy flows. But artist are generally very vain people that need constant social reaffirmation and so it is unlikely that the cause of ceasing energy flows would be voluntary, the though it happens, disillusioned artist turning away from their talent and energies, it is rare. Accidental restrictions because of earthly personal hardships wars, sickness, family, economics, are more likely to shut down creative energy flows into the artistic mind than anything else. But there is a another thing that can cause a muse to fail, a creative energy to wane, dwindle and sink. Remember that the artist is tuning in to energies, more than being creative the artist is a conductor that assimilate energies well, but as energies flow through the universe they are not necessarily uniform nor continues, an artistic energy vessel will have not always find the energies that nourish its receptors and when this occurs, you may get writers block or you may all together cease to regenerate your aesthetic movements.

And then there is the other horrible thing that can happen to the artist. Being an energy vessel means that you can channel and harvest energies from the universal pond but it also means that you are more susceptible to all energies as well. Artist can sense things that others do not, artist are more tuned to external emotional conditions and colors, and because of that they are in a sense more fragile, and that figures on what happens if the artist begins to receive high doses of energies that are not favorable winds to the nurtured aesthetic. For that matter even a high energy flow of nurtured energies would still be more than the artist can cope, causing thoughts to pile up on one another obfuscating ideas or firing neurons into disabling limbs. Excess energy might lead the artist to cut their ears off, as a way to cause a greater pain, or to commit suicide, or to other destructive tendencies. But artists are not so much destructive because they are into pain, in fact artist are so sensitive that they actually have, of peoples in general, the lowest thresholds for pain. Religions people are into pain, you have to suffer a lot to feel the existence of something that does not exist in our context, but artist, artist hate pain, hate suffering, they even hate to struggle and work, and more they are cowards. Never trust an artist, there is just too much flexibility there. But that aside artist still seem to suffer and still seem to have a sort of masochistic image, and this is because high energy flows are hard to stomach, even if you are intuitively tuned to them, and remember artist are not wiser than the rest of the populace, artist still believe that they are special, and that they are unique in the universe, and not what they really are which is just an energy unit that touches other energy better than the other guy. And that being the case means that the artist, like all those people that started world war one, the great depression, and world war two, are just as susceptible to fall victim to their ignorance of energy flows. The artist are able to view the aesthetic because of their low pain threshold, they need to escape the pain of mortality and of the earthly struggle. To be a true artist is to be an escape artist.

ENERGY DEVOLUTION & EVOLVING CONSCIOUSNESS

2006-09-04T17:43:00.000-07:00

Energy Devolution & Evolving Consciousness

As cosmic energy begins to super cool we now know that it gives rise to consciousness. So not to crash the fine party of blind belief that evolution has been enjoying for quite sometime now, I will agree that the humanity is evolving, obviously evolving as the product of a dying universe, not much merit in that sort of dying birth but some will be happy with that. But it does happen that we are evolving so the theory of evolution is not wrong so much as it is that it was applied to the wrong thing, our biological being.

Our biological being is caloric in nature, which is to say that it is devolving, anything that is energy is devolving from the big bang forward, everything in the cosmic universe has been losing energy, so the body, a carbon based apparatus, is merely an energy processing unit and not a very efficient one. Low energy is a terrible processor of energy, it is very specific as to how it will trap it, and use it. Your innards are waste energy processors, hence the reason why you are sewer energy. But the body, as anything that is caloric in nature, and the scientists will tell you correctly, there is nothing that is not caloric in nature, the body is devolving, cell division and cell multiplication is a diffusion of cosmic energy that propagates more simmering than it propagates life, what ever is more is the greater reality, no scientist will tell you that you are not, by existing, creating more entropy, you are, you are cooling down the universe. The process of its devolution looks like an evolution to us because we do not view the entire system as energy; remember that we, through reason have isolated ourselves from the universe, which means that we do not see ourselves as energy but rather as users of energy. When we view the universe instead of being envious of it we impress ourselves by pondering how we can use all that energy that is just sitting out there waiting for our ingenuity to harvest it. The idea that that energy out there is desiring itself into existence that it is in reality more alive and feeling the universe more than we are; and know this, that, that energy out there must fear you, you are the cookie monster, if you get a hold of that energy, with your organizational skills, the universe is doomed that much faster. That astronomical reality is inconceivable from this perspective. It is then the we wrongly conclude that as the universe evolves for the better that it will produce more of what “we” call, higher life forms. A faulty view stupendously supported by the accumulation of knowledge through the use of reason. But I will have to tell you, as much as it pains me to do so, that what is evolving is not your ugly caloric body, pretty only to its proper hostage, you, but what is evolving is our consciousness.

Now how can I say that in a dying universe, with energy units simmering, as it is indeed the case, as it is happening right before your eyes, how can I say that consciousness is evolving and at the same time say that, that consciousness is a dying force in the universe. Well you have to imagine that while you are dying energy it is not as if the universe hates you for that, nor is it true that because you are born to life, via some formidable feminine tunneling womb energy, that you really manage to isolate yourself from the universe, you don’t, the universe loves itself, and just because you think that you are different and especial and intelligent, the universe does not care nor register your animosity, the universe stills sees you as warmer than the nothingness, and the universe loves anything that has warmth, so the universe registers your existence as it registers its own existence. So the fantastic thing that happens is that you are still connected to the universe against your own denial of that connectivity. Consciousness is sort of a mesh, an wide and deep trapeze of cosmic wiring that allows for energy flows and energy transfusions to take place at some transcendental level. You can see it in a persons eyes when they are posses with this energy, you can feel the entire energy spectrum invigorating the existence of individuals, animals objects and positions, that have tuned access to cosmic consciousness. So though a bit disingenuous of me it is not that consciousness is evolving, consciousness is still trapped in the dying universe and it is very much dynamic as all energy is dynamic, but what occurs is that your ability to use the energy of consciousness, your ability to swing in the trapeze that connects us to the greater universe, your ability to feel that energy is evolving, if only by accident, for certainly you have not nurtured it, you have more ignored it, dictators, witches, clareaboyants, voodooists, artists, geniuses and the likes have used it, mostly because their receptors were tuned by accident or fortune; but still the use of that energy is evolving, the conscious energy of the universe is not evolving but you might yet evolve your dormant ability to feel and sense yourself a part of the universe.

One of the benefits to feeling the universe, to tuning in to its truly mysterious wiring, is that when you do that it becomes more painful to kill someone, to rape to pillage to combat that which is in the end fighting the same battle that you are against the nothingness. The realization that we are all in this together might sound cowardly but it is a truth that can not be altered, the entire nothingness is against us, by destroying one another we are only surrendering to the energy that flowing from the nothingness negates our existence. To kill other low energy units is to accelerate the birth of lower energy units, which dissipate energy even more efficiently than we do, it is to rush the entire universe as we know it, into the zero time and space resolution.

Humanity is still struggling with itself, like a child that dedicates all its energies towards self centered objectives, the conceptualization of the grander social picture is a sign of maturity, but sewer energy is, though long on its journey humanity is really young sewer energy, this is because only now is the universe beginning to truly notice and die its cold death and as the universe expands its agonizing body grows. Humanity, does not see it this way because it does not view itself as a part of the greater whole, at the ground level, the earthy level, humanity is subjective in nature, when you are barely existing, your mode of operation is completely selfish, we are self centered creatures, the altruism that is born of humanity is all based on personal satisfaction, martyrs, patriots, altruistic characters and the likes are all accomplishing a personal satisfaction at some psychological, physical or metaphysical level. It is a selfish act to help someone so as to feel that one has done the right thing, it is a selfish act to love so as to be loved, it is a selfish act to compromise so as to gain favor, the entire spectrum of the reality that we live in, in the micro isolation of energy is absolutely subjective, there is no objectivity. And the only way that there can be objectivity is if you could view the world through the eyes of another, you can’t, try as hard as you want, you will never be able to view the world through the feelings and emotions of another. Empathy is based on common experience, the assimilation is made because you fought the same war and suffered the same wounds not because you are objective.

Social entities such as Justice, Government, Economics, Philosophy, Science, they are all, each, confined prejudiced subjectives. When a lot of people agree with something it is not to say that it is true, but it is to say that it is hard to contradict a lot of people. Mass belief, the selling of ideas and concepts so that others will believe them and use them as their own, is paramount to the success of social structures. Which is why the larger the social structure the more likely it is to compromise, in order to serve the masses you have to satisfy the greater personal selfish craving, be that civic, metaphysical, or intellectual. Conversion is what all personifications of truth accomplish effectively. But the conversion serves a personal interest, no one adopts belief in anything unless it serves them in some way. Everyone is absolutely selfish, even god and specially god.

Objectivity is a fundamental impossibility, common ideas and common values rise from our need for those ideas and values, not because there is some independent force out there that is just, that is righteous, the is good. No such monsters, the universe is one giant selfish thing, there is no one siting around making sure that goodness will prevail, that justice will be done, and that you will be able to see your enemies burn in hell. Sorry, that is the reality, the universe is one large energy entity that is struggling against the nothingness with energy definitions, you may want to call upon it to ease your pain, but the universe can not feel your pain it only feels itself dying, you are what notifies the universe that it is dying, no one likes to hear bad news.

If you are a scientific or a religions person the lack of objectivity will bother you terribly, religions and scientific worshipers are terribly fearful of uncertainty and they don’t really trust themselves, which translates to, they don’t trust other people, which is why they go out of their way to create independent entities which will allow them to prove to you that they are right because, something that is not them, somehow agrees with them, and that must somehow make it all true. These types are what I categorize as the “See I told you so!” Nothing would give my religious friends more satisfaction than to witness god punishing my atheism. Here on earth they tell me that they just want me to be saved, and they pray for me, but silently the cheer pleasure that it would give them to see me gnashing teeth in hell has got to be considerable. To them I will say, just have a little faith and you will get the pleasure, energy manifestations can cause spontaneous combustion, god may get me yet.

Oh and there is the scientists, the empirical priest, they would but love to see my subjective idea, blasphemy against the empirical objectivity that they worship, to be proven positively wrong. Nature they say can not be wrong, there are absolute and discernable truths which their “skeptical” minds will flush out, but you know it is ironic that their minds are never skeptical of the fundamental principle they worship, science. And anyone in the know, knows that evolutionists are the right wing fundamentalist of science. Yet all of that belief, as well as that of relativity, is based on the massive assumption that we are independent and objective of the universe, that we are isolated from it, that we can manipulate the universe, without it in some inverse way manipulating us, and the results. The subjective influence dilemma suffered by the observer mathematically corrected, subtract the observer from the environment, so as not to contaminate the scenery, and what remains is the truth, of course once you subtract the observer you can’t observe the absolute reality that you are proving, but if you have faith in mathematica that is not an issue, you can sum away the problem. I, unfortunately never had the devotion for numbers so my faith in the expressions of the ten digital commandments and its unflinching language is lacking. And as much as I despise subjectivity because it implies that the scientist are connected to my universe of desire, I can not deny the truth, we are all everything, and you can’t subtract yourself from everything, the only subtraction that is possible, so as to create an independence, leads to perdition in the nothingness, and even there everything is still with us. Energy is glued to energy.

Here is where relativity is a terrible criminal, and to be fair I love the theory, it is brilliant and fantastic and more so because I don’t understand it; and anything that I don’t understand must be brilliant indeed, but relativity is basically an elimination of prejudice, and a rigorous formulation of the local physics, limiting velocity to the speed of light, forcing time to suffer the effects of speed, making the universe of plastic gelatin that pronounces itself through wrinkling when energy mass rests on it, and all measurable and adhering to mathematical principles created by the brilliance of the logical and objective human imagination as hosted by the human brain, a low calorie apparatus that allows humans to think. It is all so clean and beautiful and so void of uncertainty, and so full of provable predictions it is impossible not to fall in love with it, and so many have, myself included.

But is anyone objective with the object of that they love? To give birth to an idea, to create a work of art, to give life to a religion, to a science, or to a horror like a political philosophy you need to love it; and you need to believe in it, and to have faith in it, and when I say you have to believe in it, I mean that you have to believe in it before you can prove it to the world, and before you can prove it to yourself! Belief, faith, all products of desire, of pure and irrational desire, and the feelings nurtured by that desire, are the irrational causes of all realities. The afterthought is knowledge, the creation of entities and ideas, the birth of a child, is the manifestation of a desire, a desire that is not logical or objective. The entire universe is a subjective desire for existence. Your consciousness rises from that desire, you are selfish because you need to try to survive, and you are starving for resources, and as you evolve an understanding of the inherent desire consciousness that brought you into existence you are able to harvest its illogical energy for good or ill, to promote dogma or technology, or to promote the soul, the magical or the empirical.

Realizing that we are just another manifestation of energy, ceasing to isolate ourselves from the consciousness that gives rise to our being, then we will have greater access to peer into the nothingness, and perhaps we will be able to lure and trap its infinite energies. So to correct myself, it is not that consciousness is evolving, nor that we are evolving, but rather that we might tap the existing resources of our origins by negating our negation. Remember the nothingness wants to die, you would not exist if that were not the case, your death back into the nothingness is just a case of failed suicide.

THE OBJECTIVITY OF ENERGY

2006-09-04T17:42:00.000-07:00

Well since I am going down the slide of admission of guilt, through correction, a mere clarification from my perspective, let me yet again correct the illogical here. First I tell you that there is no objectivity, that you yourself can not be objective, and I tell you that since there is no objectivity that absolute truths are not possible, and yet here I am telling you not only that everything is energy, including the nothingness, and even the zero energy corona, that does not have any energy, but still would not exist if it wasn’t at one point the child of sewer energy or other energy manifestations. Then after making every entity or structure the product of energy I proceed to say that the energy itself is neutral to characteristic, and its representations are merely manifestations of temperature dropping, energy always attempting to maintain temperature and dynamic is the only fundamental cause of energy transformations. That would make energy the basis for everything, and high energy the goddess of it all, and all measures could be deduced if absolute energy confinement and absolute temperature If so then it stands to reason that there is an absolute, and something that can be deduced even by pure mathematics, specially if it is based on dynamic as produced by temperature variations.

If everything is energy, and the energy itself is neutral then it stand to reason that there are two absolutes. Temperature and objective temperature. Objective temperature of course would be the highest obtainable temperature because from that culmination all other temperatures are obtained and all representations of energy manifest themselves. The absolute objective temperature contains within itself all the potential of the universe, the big bang contained the absolute potential temperature for our universe, it was not however an absolute temperature in that it was unable to escape the nothingness absolutely, an absolute temperature big bang should be able to create a universe that will infinitely avoid the void. But from our imperfect, absolute big bang, objective temperature, as the universe cools all of the variable potentials begin to manifest themselves through kinetics. Those two absolutes create an objectivity, if you can’t be outside of the energy then the energy is the constant that you can measure yourself, sewer energy, against. Further, not being able to exist outside of the energy means that for you no other entity exist, you can never peer into things which do not get in touch with you, so relativity, quantum and even the most impossible of all evolution, should in theory be correct.

But as always my admissions of guilt should be suspect because the cruel reality is that it is your reality that you are observing and not the reality of the totality. The neutrality of energy is not a neutrality in the sense that energy is subjective to itself, if energy could absolve itself of itself it could tell us the truth, if there is such a thing, but there is no truth, which is probably why energy doesn’t care about anything but its own version of it. Ok I will reluctantly agree that temperature can be measured and that measuring temperature can give us an idea of how the energy will manifest in that condition, plasma does not happen at room temperature that sort of thing can be measured, for life to exist as we exist there is a limited energy spectrum, and it is because we know how limited that spectrum is, that we think of ourselves as special. Cosmic energy has the potential to manifest itself infinitely close to the gamut of the energy spectrum, hence the reason why its manifestations are so difficult to narrow into scientifically comprehensible categories.

In other words wild objective temperature is an absolute as it originated with the big bang, the cruel reality is that the universe is now a representation of all that temperature, that is, it is a kinetic expression of temperature depletion, the universe, since the big bang, has been and is a diminishing kinetic force, and the energy that is running down that energy high is the energy that is trying to understand itself as only a part of itself, which is more impossible than you might imagine.

Which is why I am here trying to get you to admit that you are not special, that you are just a representation of energy, a low energy spectrum, with the foolish hope that once you realize that you are not especial but that the whole universe is especial and that you are helping to kill all of us and the universe, there is no differentiation, then you might realize that if you want this universe to survive, this particular version of an original desire that allowed energy agglomeration within the nothingness, if you want this to survive you might have to either kill yourself, which is the equivalent of clogging the drain, or you could figure out how to feed new energy from the nothingness into this dimension that we call a universe and in so doing reversing or diminishing the cooling of energy. Of course you ought to bear in mind that anything you do to save this universe, if it is to be successful, will kill you and humanity. Perhaps that is why humanity is so self destructive a manifestation of the universe attempting to cease the hemorrhaging of energy.

Of course if you are like me, you might want to just surrender on this universe. It really would require a lot of work and much combined effort in the part of the entire consciousness of the universe to hold all of this kinetic energy from wasting itself, it is like trying to embrace and suffocate an explosion, so I personally would rather let it all finish itself off. That our universe exists implies that other more perfect desired universes are possible, and once you have existed, even if it is not a wonderful existence, it is still a more desired condition than the nothingness, so as you return to the nothingness you are also more likely to rise out of the nothingness, more so than other energy that has not manifested itself in a desired universe, and you are more likely to have a more pure desire for definition. And even if that all fails it should comfort you some to know that while in the nothingness you might suffer indifference but you will never suffer pain, which voids the suffering indifference nicely. Immediately and I don’t expect this to be much of a consolation, suffering is actually not something that energy does, as it is a manifestation of sewer energy or and consciousness as it realizes its mortality. That realization of course is because you fall in love with a condition of existence which you don’t want to change, of course everything is dynamic so your desire for stability, is not even imaginable in this desired universe, in this kinetic universe you must keep on moving and changing, and it is because that is the case that you came here in the first place.

It is your desire to remain as you are that gives rise to objectivity, a subjective manifestation if there was ever one, imagine that while you assume yourself the product of an evolution, something dynamic, that now you want that evolution to stop so you can remain yourself, so that humanity can continue to exist. And now picture this, you have seen how circumstances and environment have created some nice extinction’s, and yet you would like that not to happen to you. But don’t worry, neither the universe, nor the local environment is going to halt for you. And the reason it is not going to stop for you is because the universe is alive with dynamics, while you are actually manifesting your proximity to the nothingness. The only thing that does not change, the only simmering generic is the nothingness; like it or not the desire for stability is not of this universe of desire, it is a manifestation of the nothingness, it is the part of yourself that with proximity to the nothingness, recalls a non changing nothingness and now with agonizing energy you want to impose that on a dynamic universe. Of course if you could force the universe to cease its dramatic dynamic you would only be murdering the energy that much faster, which as sewer energy is what you do anyway, and if you really loved the universe you would hate yourself, but since you have isolated yourself from the universe, so you could shed a few tears and act a bit miserable, in a universe where energy does not have time to suffer, well that is what you have made of yourself, you could change it but why.

You really think that all the suffering in the world is inevitable, we don’t come from suffering, we come from the nothingness which knows no suffering, we come from the desire for definition that causes energy agglomerations manifested as universes which do not have any idea of what suffering is, your soul does not suffer, the only thing that suffers is that which refuses to change, which refuses to move on, which wants to hold still, which fears the fact that this version of itself will not exist forever, and ever. Ok souls suffer, but they suffer because they get attached to this earth, because they feel incomplete, because their fears or their passions were never fully experienced, lives or any representations energy that are reservoirs of emotions are corrosively bound to the obfuscated desire, and these will never know rest from a self imposed agony. Should they meet with catastrophe they will still need to return to the wanting existence as another, or within another to complete their wanting desires.

The aesthetic is not into pain, the universe is not into pain, the infinite corona, is not into pain; you are into pain because you have, through reason, separated yourself, from the universe that you are, and incredulously even from your own humanity. Of course you do not see this agony as the product of a mind that isolates, isolates even as it needs the very energy that it isolates from, to think, but you don’t see reason and knowledge as the cause of your painful struggle. This is because you only associate yourself with the part of reason that makes local sense, the laws of physics make sense as far as they are concordant with the expressed dimension and the local universe, it is hard to resist the reality that is visible, it is more difficult to believe in the reality that we are not able to register with our five senses. And yet it is that reality that we can not see and that we barely feel that has more to do with our existence than anything else. The communication and awareness that builds a humanity are the least visible, most of the unfelt and unseen, is what allows us to exist, and we are but a infinitesimal spec of spectrum which nurtures our existence.

As you struggle against your humanity, a suicidal tendency if ever there was one, as you seek to destroy others, perhaps a favor to the universe, remember that as you create your struggle, and reason that struggle, for today the injustice and the economic definition of the world defines existence, as a rational winner take all, may you be aware that a struggle against your own kind will cloud any comprehension you have of the universe. To understand the universe you will need to use all of humanity to sense it, to feel it, you are a singular beast, the parts of yourself whose destruction or suffering you justify with your reason, are the ones that cloud the possible comprehension of your universality.

Reason and knowledge of course are not terrible things, they like anything else have no fundamental morality, they are just conservative expressions of the universe, the future may subjectively use an objectified technology, an objectified logic but it is doubtful that logic is what will bring humanity to see itself as a desire expression that is formulated by temperature, but regardless electrodynamics dictates, how charged you are with your own desire, and with your own existence will determine your, so independent, mode of rational.

BIG BANG MELTDOWN

2006-09-04T17:41:00.000-07:00

I think I once read a book in which the writer was attempting to suggest the calculable size of the universe. He or she noted that the universe must have a size that is relational to the size of its smallest constituency. This is what I would call the, “tell me how small you are and I will tell you how big you can be.” I have my own interpretation of this ingenious comparison. Find a two star solar system, that is two suns orbiting around each other, add their combine mass together and what ever their aggregate mass is, will determine the maximum size and weight that the universe can locally support. The reason that we have two sun solar systems its because the combined mass is unable to sustain equilibrium within the fabric of the universe, and so it collapses into two suns, which the universe can apparently sustain. It will be unlikely, if not impossible, to find single stars that equal the aggregate weight of two sun systems. The importance of this is astronomical, it defines the capacity of the universe to sustain object density, it implies that the universe has weight limitations. If I am correct, and as of this time there is no proof to doubt my correctness, but if I am correct, the universe has limitations, if so then it is possible to imagine that the universe limits our comprehension with its own inherent limitations, which invariably must affect us, us little constituents of the greater limited. But what the universe can not limit is our explanations. “Save yourselves if you can.”

There are rational reasons for why the universe functions as it does, and there are irrational reasons too. Rational reasons are local and temporary violations of the irrational laws that quintessentially govern the universe. Irrational dictates that everything in the universe is intertwined and interconnected, and the same thing even when different. The only event that is not interchangeable, intertwined or the same is explanation.

There is no greater simplification of the existence of the universe than the big bang explanation. One giant explosion from massively concentrated origins, at once the tiniest singularity, giving birth to the biggest, the universe. Brilliantly simple. It is so easy to apprehend that there is no reason why it should not be adopted, like evolution it has a very linear structure, and it allows everything to be measured from the perspective of point zero big bang.

Unfortunately if all things are possible, and they are, then it is also possible to imagine that the big bang theory is wrong and not true, both of those being different, wrong could certainly be the context of the big bang, there could be such a thing as a big bang, but not in the context that we structure it; or and not true simply because our universe may have come into existence, a billion trillion ways different from that.
The theory of an irrational desire allows for any kind of creation of the universe as long as there is energy that desires whatever sort of creation that is conceived. So I have used the big bang throughout this book as if it were a fundamental truth for us all, but I did it because it was more useful than true. Placing the creation of the universe in such a context simplified the philosophical process, it would have been extremely difficult to discuss the irrational idea of desire from the nothingness while at the same time disputing the big bang theory, it was simpler to make good use of it, but now we must discard it because it is simply wrong.

And it is wrong because it is not so much that everything in the universe is moving away from everything else, as it is that everything is receding in temperature. It is that recession that we perceive as an expansion. All things are receding back into the nothingness, and it is the differential of that energy descent that causes things to appear to be moving away from each other.

Now before you proceed to imagine that there is some kind of a big crunch taking place let me subtract that possibility by saying that it is more like running in place, it is a dimensional death, it is not a space time death, thought the space time will perish in that other dimension to which we are on our way. The things are not coming together because the birth and death of the desire is by an large local in nature, things appear to implode and explode into and out of existence because they migrate from one dimension to the next, it is a sort of morphing or better said a metamorphoses that places entities in a particular existence, death is a metamorphosis into the nothingness, or into another energy form, or into the infinite corona, or a reincarnation, or etc… and unimaginably all of those and many more happen all within the same point of desire. The extension of that possibility has the infinite potential of the nothingness, desire can spring anywhere and in any form within the fundamental nothingness.

What is really taking place in the universe is a cursive severity of the desire which is everywhere within the nothingness trying to write itself into existence. The evenness observed in the universe, merely reflects the evenness of the nothingness, the universe does not expand, it is not expanding, the universe grows from an infinite number of points of desire that could as much be nothing, like the simmering nothingness, or the aspiring energy. But each manifestation takes place much in its own locality, the universe is actually less mobile than we suspect, it seems like it is dynamic in every direction, and within the measure of the universe this is true, but the universe is rather sedentary, as it merely sits on the nothingness, like the earth siting on a giant turtle.

Your body is a universe of sorts, a habitat for cells, viruses, organs, bones, and so on… but your body does not move very much in relationship to the infinity of space that there is in the world for it to move in. Yet things in your innards are constantly moving at velocities that are speedy and rest free relative to your corporal physical standards. For instance blood is incessantly recycling itself through your heart every twenty minutes. Though you might be at rest your heart never really takes a break, and your mind never really sleeps, it is always ready to be instantly on sitting in a bath of neuron activity while you sleep. So much is moving inside of your body you yourself are a relative stable immobile unit specially in relationship to the amount of space that is out there. Well get this, we are inside of the universe, we perceive the universe as moving rapidly, everything in the universe appears to be speeding away from everything else, but like the cells in our body that die while others are born many times within our life times, and they only perceive their own importance, cancer cells being a perfect example of arrogant cells, but in the same way that we are a colony of agglomerated organisms, within the universe we are similar in that our perception is from within the body of the universe.

Any observation we make as entities within the body of the universe are not about the body of the universe, they are merely observations of how some part of the innards of the universe behave in relationship to us. What the body of the universe is doing is really not knowable to us by process of observation. We can not see the universe advancing matter into a void, the image of the big bang is one of a universe that explodes into the void, filling it with energy matter. But we would have to stand outside of that explosion, and at a safe distance, to observe that explosion into the void and prove it beyond doubt. And then, being outside of the universe we would also be able to view the entire universe, the whole body of it, engulfing the void with its burst of blinding persevering dynamics.

But not only can we not stand outside to view this big bang thing exploding, for we, as the version of ourselves that we desire to perceive, are after all only able to exist within the confines of the universal body that hosts our existence; more the reality is that there is no “out there”. The reality is that nothing exist outside of the nothingness or of the universe, and any perception of an “out side” is merely dimensional. For the universe as really an incubator of matter from within the nothingness, matter is born and the nothingness fades with the apparition of matter, this fading and transformation process can make it appear as if objects were expanding or contracting, and the end of a billion trillion years of our existence might not even comprise one cycle of the process within the corporal body of the universe; the corporal body of the universe being all the energy and all the matter, same opposites.

And the cycle itself is so local in nature that there is really no boundary to the universe. The nothingness is infinite, parts of it form into universes, just as they may desire to be infinitely other things, fantastic or fantasy things, there is no fiction, anything you can imagine is true somehow, somewhere; you do not have the capacity to think outside of the universe, that would require imagination. The nothingness has infinite potential to be anything, we inhabit a universal desire for energy definition that is observable as such from our locality, and that locality has not other side for us in our current condition. We could travel say back in time or forward in time but that would have to occur within this condition, and within this space time expression. In order to view the nothingness, the infinite corona thing, or some fantasy land that may have conjured itself from the nothingness, we would have to metamorphose into that habitat and structure. And while we would certainly have that historical expression in our infinite DNA, it would be mostly inaccessible to us from any other expression of desire. The reason that we become aliens from other things its because to be anything we have to have fundamental desire and belief, this is mandatory so as to maintain our desired reality; and this is more true for sewer energy or any low energy apparitions, they, we have to be less open minded to impossibility because it requires a concentration of energy to maintain any and all desires. The more energy the more possibilities that are desirable. A cosmic particle has sort of a great existence as long as it doesn’t some how fall into desiring to be nothing, in which case it will get closer to being like the expression we call sewer energy, us.

The brutal point is that the perception of space is largely a construct of lower energy forms, multidimensional high energy expressions can occupy many points of space and time, so their perception of time is really warped, such entities do not measure, they do not use calendars, they merely manifest themselves in a point of desire. Standing still they can just transfer into another dimensional manifestation which can be observed, by us, as the appearance of movement and velocity. This is because the universe is an incubator and incubators favor heat, they make things happen with energy and more energy, the incubator of matter energy is a desire that exist in a multidimensional region that supercedes the nothingness, it is not an explosion as we perceive it, it is a morphing of energy caused by an agglomeration of energy, energy that is dispersed over a wide nothingness and is as much the wide nothingness as it isn’t when it isn’t.

You might want to ask yourself why is the big bang so wrong? Because it is very wrong indeed. Well there is a perception problem, and it is a serious perception problem, caused by the fact that we learn from what we observed and unfortunately what we observe is not what gives rise to things, is not what makes things happen, is not what actually is, but rather, what we observe is the result of something that is a result of something else, that ultimately does not know so much what it is as what it does not want to be. The universe does not want to be nothing, but the universe can not explain itself to itself, it understands better what it despises, the nothingness, it is hideous. So you can’t understand yourself because your production is always a case of running away, and when you are in an escape condition it is difficult to perceive the reality that you are passing through, so if you suffer from a feeling of having to know, if you feel the urge to be more in control of the ever changing cycles of the universe, then you begin to make some things true; and since the only things that you can make true are those that you can observe and ultimately manipulate you then over-imposed those understandings into the grander picture, an explosion is the most rudimentary concept, the most consistent process that humanity perceives, humanity has then used it to explain itself to itself, it is a birth of simplicity and fear, it is a localizing of the impossible universal understanding.

The universe of course does not really care how you and I explain it, it is irrelevant, ultimately the universe just looks at us as an energy deficient thing, a retarded energy form, and it is us, who and what we are, that the universe must figure out how to correct, so as to cease the energy leakage, so as to maintain the incubator so as to continue to nurture the universe from the nothingness.

Fundamentally desire is a precursor to thought, irrational processes ferment and equal desire, all entities are manifestations of a desire that can be studied, but the situation of study, the learning of a thing does not make it different at the fundamental level; knowledge, any attempt at knowledge, has always a better chance of erring than of being right. It is inconceivable to us that knowledge, which has given us things like farming and technology, could be fundamentally wrong, and fortunately we can live with this belief till we perish. knowledge is how we believe we persist, that the accumulation of knowledge, true or false, is a sign that our universe is dying and that we are its killers, seems impossible and yet it is the tragic truth. The complete destruction of humanity, the best conductor to zero energy, would serve the universe a longer life expectancy!

But if the big bang is wrong and even evolution is there any way for us to save ourselves? Does awareness of desire give us any fundamental advantage? Could we be feeling the universe instead of knowing it and if so is that in some way beneficial to us?

Well let me just say that nothing that you do is going to prevent the irrevocable axiom that the universe is doomed and that you are more doomed and sooner doomed than the universe. Sure you could recycle yourself via reincarnation or you could be a foster soul in another body, or in another dimensional expression, but in the end our universe was and is a flawed desire, and you are not magnificent and wonderful enough to be the entity that can reverse the process. It is too late. While I hate to be so absolute about it that is the gruesome reality. But not to despair, because that which rises from the nothingness can not be destroyed, you are less divisible than you might suspect, your love of security and consistency, and you xenophobic attitude towards anything that is not precisely like you do not yet make you any different than the rest of the universe. You can abstract yourself into specialty but in the end the universe hugs you when you die and the nothingness welcomes you with joy and grief. Joy because you reassure its existence as what it is, and grief because it realizes that your failed escape marks the continuation of the most boring manifestation of energy ever conceived, its simmering nothingness.

But do not despair, I have painted a gloomy and dark outlook because, knowledge and religion, the two giant explanations for existence do not allow for positive endings. Entropy is the scientific lock down of our doomed existence, religion with, salvation or damnation, shuts down all other options for us all. But there are many other options that are more worthy of subscription. My personal favorite is that the universe is not born, nor does it die, but it just simply is. Yes, the universe just exists, and if and when it doesn’t exist, it does not matter because time does not lapse outside of space time. Our universe always is, the idea of a beginnings or endings merely created by anthropomorphic humanity devising it’s own subjective knowledge of universe. Certainly we can imagine a universe that has no end and no beginning; and such immense and wondrous universe never expands or contracts though regions, within the immense universe, a part of the immense same opposites nothingness, would have the potential to expand or contract, to begin anew, to regenerate and collapse. Anything outside, the one infinite universe, either does not exist or exist as an unrecognizable entity or thing. A universe that does not end does not have to explode into existence expressing an absolutists origin, that universe lives forever, certainly parts of it may fade out of existence but others spontaneously rise from the nothingness, from the void into being; and the universe as a whole persists without pause, unaware of finality. And it follows that there are not a thousand universes but just one infinite universe, one multidimensional universe, where strange things and normal events occur with some regularity. And that is all. Evolution has something to fear here: Spontaneous apparitions of raw desire.

THE NOTHINGNESS DOESN'T DIE

2006-09-04T17:37:00.001-07:00

Of course you might, after a good time in oblivion, reemerge in another version of desire, desire bobbing like an apple on a water tank of nothingness for eons, but to your good fortune the nothingness is timeless, so if you rise again, with a desire, it is always immediately after you have fallen into the nothingness. No time is wasted. And yet perhaps you will be wiser for it, as the collected memoir of one or many universes or desire expressions that once perished; you will of course remember nothing, but perhaps you will be aware of something, and in that awareness you may have reached closer to the perfection of a desire different from the perfection that we call the nothingness.

The exact distance and time between the nothingness and something equals zero. The good of all these mess in the dimension which harbors and labors oblivion, is that it is also within your being, it is not outside of it, nothing is really outside of yourself, imagine a lighted match that hides the darkness, you don't imagine that the match has killed the darkness, the darkness can not die, but the burning match superimposes its temporary reality, a reality that requires energy to flash into existence, it superimposes that upon the construct of darkness, the darkness rest underneath all that, it does not care, it does not have any energy to care, and it is so immense with its indifference that it consumes the match, and it consumes the match because the fire from the match fails to fuel itself into infinity, that is timelessness, that is sameness of self everywhere.

I will grant you that it is difficult to imagine of grasp how billions or trillions of years can pass in oblivion and not equal any time separation in any expression, but try to imagine if you will that the expression of oblivion is inherent to your nature, so dying becomes impossible even within the oblivion, and as you rise back into the expression of a desire universe, you discover that no time has transpired because you are the measuring unit that allows time to transpire, you blink out of existence the clock ceases to tick, you return and the clock ticks once again, of course the universe that can maintain a desire expression might still continues to happen, though it is more possible to imagine that time ceases at once for all, you me and the universe, it is doubtful, in fact let me just say it, it is impossible for anything within the universe to die before the universe dies, but assuming that you did, in other words assuming a hypothetical death, your expression will then only acknowledge its conceptualization of time; and it will reconnect to expressions that assimilate the particular conceptualization and complete it, it is the essence of existence to seek normalization of events, the chained fury that unleashes existence is a freak controlled reaction. It is that element of control which attracts desire expressions to the limitations and burdens of existence.

The oblivion is within your heart, if you search into yourself, you will find the empty abyss of oblivion within yourself, it is when you touch it that it petrifies you, and so you explode to connect to externals, to things, to beings, to others, a fire burning from a match has no greater agony than that of suffering the darkness within that makes it shine bright. We never escape ourselves, never, but we endeavor to do so, escape velocity form the self is impossible, we are infinite, we can not die, what dies in us all, is what we try to make of ourselves.

But really folks, how can you hope to make a bird from a dinosaur, how can you hope to make a man from a monkey? If you really feel it, it sounds absurd, but it does make sense, and this is what has happen since we went into the big sleep. But you don’t need a big bang or all those primordial acids to compound themselves with just the right amount of this and that, to create a bipedal, carbon based, oxygen burning life form; what you need is the DESIRE for that thing to exist! And so things, you, me, Leprechauns and the universe, and even the infinite corona, arrive into being and evolve not because they need to be a species, to adapt, and to survive, but rather we come into existence, all and everything within and extroverted from us all, from a wished and manifest desire to exist!

A spiraling galaxy blossoms from a nest of desire, its core bathing in desire energy, flowering spiraling arms extending into the vastness of space.

So the bigger question might be why would one want to be a rat? One could easily argue that being a rat is not a good thing, and if being a rat is indeed not a good thing, then we shall say that a rat has intent desire to be on a ship and even in life, but not enough desire to raise its consciousness to the level of a humanity. In other words, the intensity of the desire to be in life gives you more senses to be and feel in that life, and that very intensity of desire formulates the complexity of the organism or animal that is that life.

Of course one could also argue that it is ok to be a rat and that it is a different way to desire the experience of life, a different perspective and no less given to the intensity suffered by those walking the streets of our metropolis. But if one desires to be a rat, and it is not a question of lack of intensity of desire, then being a rat requires no explanation. And in an strange way all that explains the year of the rat as celebrated in the Chinese calendar.

The intensity of life itself is promulgated by the combined desire that is fostered by those that have chosen to participate in it. These people and things are all connected by their desire, this is even true if it were the case that an alien race had planted us here as part of some biological experiment and pets were merely monitoring units, all the intricate relationships, from human, to alien, to dog, to environment, would suffer an intertwined subjective desire, any character or thing not involved in the desire would soon collapse its own manifestation. Discordance with environment is not allowed, you don’t exist where you don’t desire to exist. It is the similarity of all combined desires that create connections in method and practice, and it is these connections that are erroneously seen as an evolution. But the species does not so much evolve as the nature of its desire changes. Which of course means, that know all you want to know, about the history, the biology, or the physics, but you are not tapping with knowledge the inexplicable desire itself. Any changes that you cause through the use of knowledge, that is via the scientific rational method, can not be supported if the irrational desire for them to exist is not already fundamental in the nature of the participants. In this way, the scientific method can recreate what has transpired more from a desire to do so than from technique. A species does not so much evolve because of environmental copulation and necessity but rather because of an endemic desire to explore another aspect of itself and its environment and more, a species evolves, because it is cooling.

You can, I hope, feel how desire might lead you to love a person or an idea, or even to love and to nurture your own essence; you may feel how others might develop an interest in common truths, and tend to them like a farmer tends to his fields. In that you can see an island like Galapagos as the perfect building blocks to explain a desire, where there is the bounty of life, there is desire, where the coffin that seals the world is porous, there is inspiration.

The truth blurs under scrutiny, approximation to the truth mandates generalizations, scrutiny will only reveal how temporary and unreal everything is because at the most microscopic level, underneath it all is the nothingness. Knowledge is a creative beast but it is a failure of personal character to make it magnificent just because it has a lot of organizational skills, or because it overcomes a lot of obstacles. To enslave thought to the chains of knowledge, where now it is heresy to speak in any other tongue, is a tragedy and hoax, and a hoax that denies the pure irrational desire of our existence.

Irrational desire dictates a fundamental break with knowledge, the world’s fundamental distrust of knowledge is correct. Irrational desire calls for the glorification of fundamental irrational elements, and the emotional exploitation of the environment and the self. Of course the only way out of this insane rational retardation is a philosophical, and perversely irrational escape. You can rationalize what you feel, but you can’t feel what you rationalize, rational is a dead end because it is a diversion from the capriciousness of the emotions and the desires of each essence. Death is the only rational process that works perfectly! Death is a logical conclusion, pure insanity. But any arrest of the emotional is a temporary solution, it cures no long term ills, invariably a person must return to the essence of self or die, and since essence does not perish that will lead to the further manufacturing of turmoil. .

Emotional desire is the default structure of all existence, it does not make sense from a rational perspective, nor does it make sense from the emotional perspective, but the emotional does not have to rhyme. You do not need knowledge to understand the universe you need to feel it, masticate it, fornicate with it, you need to wet kiss it with perky lips of adoration! you have been safeguarding yourself from your emotions which is to say you have been playing bondage with the most inexplicable and powerful essence of your universe. Knowledge is a thrown away tool and Logic is sophisticated reductionism, all produced by the discomforting and inherent uncertainty of our universe; from this fear rose the age of explanation, and it will live until you can accept uncertainty. Until you can accept that you might be as much immortal as mortal, regardless it is merely desire that matters, dead things can desire to exist and do so all the time.

Irrational desires give birth to all realities. A person predicting an earthquake ought be more highly respected than the technology that attempts to do the same. It ought be recognized that technology is merely a manifestation, sometimes obstructive, of a capacity inherent within our personal sense of environment. Airplanes, for instance, fly because we reach an applicable mass comprehension of that belief, a primordial manifestation of a higher consciousness, that is reached through mass agreement. Levitation is not a fantasy but it does require severe concentration, mass concentration requires less energy, but also produces a faulty product. The ability to predict an earthquake, will always be better accomplished by a human than by a machine, which is merely a poor translation of human potential. You can warp reality with perception, lacking that, magnets and metric tensors can accomplish the same.

It may help all to remember that at any given time humanity has been mostly wrong about its knowledge or ideas; the present has a reckless tendency to build its reputation by invalidating the past. Mesopotamia, if I remember correctly, valued its astrologers like we value our nuclear scientists, the Aztecs worshipped some bloody god named Huitzilopochtli, The Maya favored the Sun, a god that, unusually for a deity, you can see but could be bad for your eyes if you did. The Greeks according to us were very wrong about their collection of mythological gods, and the Roman’s which took a liberal advantage of Greek mythology, wrong too, all of them mostly wrong! This is course if, and it is a huge if, if we assume that our monotheistic idealism is correct. Isaac Newton wonderful genius that he was, according to Einstein, was mostly wrong on the reasons behind his gravitational physics, and it was just coincidence, desire and intuition if you will, that his physics made any sense.

It would be difficult to argue that any of all the wars that have been fought throughout history were valid necessities, they were mostly wrong; even warmongers do not in their hearts support war, they instead justify war under the guise of self defense. Surely we could have done without bloody civil wars; but wars are justified under rational ideas, world war two was a rational war, based on the rationalized unjust treatment of Germany by the victors of world war one; and based on the rational logic used to breed dogs, selective breeding, purely a rational concept. Not just mostly wrong but all wrong! And then there is good governance as done by the chieftain, emperors, kings, dictators, feudal lords; but now we have parliament and presidents and democracies. More right? But if we have evolved, as it is mostly agreed, then everyone before us was mostly wrong about government. Remember slavery, unpaid labor, now we have minimum wages, in the past they were mostly wrong about the way they tortured labor. The assumption is, that we are mostly right and more evolved than the past for the past was obviously mostly wrong. Neanderthal man was very wrong, end of story; just like the dinosaurs who were apparently, if you believe the meteor theory, very bad at guessing disasters. For most of its existence humanity has been mostly wrong, or has operated on wrong principles, there is no reason to suspect that posterity will not be equally kind with us. Or if such judgement from posterity is to be wrong we could opt to believe that for most of its existence humanity has been mostly right and doing the best that it can under the circumstances; at no time being able to exceed its potential but rather operating at full steam. Neanderthal man might have observed a thriving humanity and decided to skip town. And in the age of the Greek trauma maybe there were all kinds of imperfect, nasty and moody gods, just as real as the Christian god, and maybe more real because those were the days when there could be plenty of gods, more faith, more believers, all made it easy for gods to thrive; but as the age of reason succeeded faith, the gods could find no soul food, till there were only two or one or none.

THE AURA OF BEING

2006-09-04T17:37:00.000-07:00

In some strange way the universe does require our being, it seems at first a unnecessary requirement, we are fragile creatures that can easily over heat under very serene pressures. All around us things are pushing their way into us, and yet we resist them, we push them away, we keep them at bay, but the resistance always crashes back on us, as humans our capacity to perish is immense.

You can’t walk away from the universe, you both need each other, the universe needs you to express its existence, to create a nature of being, to divine the spirit of existence, and like the head and hart of any being, you are a fragile organ. The universe too is fragile that is why you exist. The universe does not want to die so it created you to rescue it from its longer, in coming, but no less certain death. Only the brain and heart is suffering from an autodidactic disease. The brain and heart of the universe is trying to outmaneuver and conquer itself, its own kind . When you are your only enemy you are the only one that will lose.

COLLAPSING DESIRE

2006-09-04T15:42:00.000-07:00

In a complex world where everyone wants to comprehend everything nothing is a larger problem than the desire to satisfy that desire of understanding. We live in the age of explanation. And while the world at large wants to know at the same time the world wishes not to know, it has to claim a sort of ignorance about how things really work; and the world at large claims this ignorance because it really can not do anything to correct itself, the world at large knows that it is pointless to tune to something that is irrelevant. It is the infernal paradox that is true here, we can and can not trust the instructional knowledge of our humanity.

The reality that while we live in a condition of denial we also live in a condition of awareness of all things is a contradiction of sorts, thought not directly, because a pure contradiction would be to say that we are truly ignorant and truly knowledgeable, we can not say that, rather we can say we are truly aware and we truly chose not to know many things, particularly because we know better, and it is not really because we know better but rather because we are aware, and that awareness is protecting us from the burdens unnecessary knowledge can impose upon us.

Knowledge for instance imposes upon us the burden for action, knowledge produces a degree of dissatisfaction, in particular because it creates the idea that, that which can be known can be changed; and yet the reality is that nothing can be changed, you have to work with everything as it is, because the truth is that the manifestation of any entity, by the time it pricks at you to make you aware of its presence, it’s so defined that to change it is mostly impossible, it is very hard to change anything that imposes itself upon other entities, because the imposition can only take place after the entity imposing it, is so full of its desired existence that it will never be in its benefit to change. You for instance are energy, try and change that in this desire universe of pure energy, annihilation.

Can you change the fact that the environment is being destroyed by your humanities expanding of existence? Of course not, the expansion of humanity is paramount to its idea of self, it is because sewer energy has fallen in love with its essence that it will proceed to promulgate its essence into everything, so it is that the condition of simmering is inevitable for our universe. In order for humanity to exist energy flows must cool, humanities expansion does not just take place at the expense of the earth but also at the expense of the entire universe.

And all this is true because the goal of everything is really to be everything, humanity, in its search for extraterrestrial life, is not really interested in finding aliens that are fundamentally different from itself, rather it is searching for more of itself, other humanities that might have risen in other similar environments in the universe, ask a scientist what the probability for life is in the universe, and that scientist will surely perform a calculation based on how many possible earth like habitats there are. Humanity wants to link to itself, the goal is to find other humanities and, I would be willing to bet your life, that if there are other humanities out there, that they too are vigorously searching for us, and with so much determination that with good fortune we are on a head on collision course with them. Things that are alike attract each other, humanity is destine to find aliens just like itself.

Should humanity in its search for its same other stumble upon some very different alien life then you can expect that there will be a universal war to vanquished that life form, because that life form is a direct rival to our type of simmering energy, any life that exist within the borders of energy that is not identical to ours is a threat to the condition of simmering based on humanities terms and composition. In other words humanity will fight to be the worms that feast on the corpse of the universe!

It is the awareness that only sameness will help us to conquer the universe that ultimately tunes us to equality of belief, a sameness of mind, democracy is not so much a manifestation of an individual mental evolution but rather it is the synchronizing force that induces humanity to breath and chain the same ideas so as to be powerful. Democratic and capitalistic countries are not likely to fight against one another because they are so much the same sin, and you can’t find guilt within the sin itself. Democratic and capitalistic countries commit crimes that are not registered as crimes. Things that are alike unite to become larger and greater because they can not find fault because of their communality, things that are fundamentally different can be immediately identified as criminal and so different ideas and philosophies, such as communism vs. capitalism, seek to destroy each other. Evil is what is not like us. Judeo-Christianity fought to destroy all other gods that were not made in its own image by incorporating evil into its cosmology; no escape, you are the child of their god, if you reject him, you are evil in the Judeo-Christian hell. Incorporating a sameness of humanity into philosophy fills the void of ideas: Evolution: Big Bang: Psychology: Plate Tectonics: Relativity: Quantum: Democracy: Capitalism: Judeo-Christianity/Islam/Buddhism: Shakespeare, just give me one more damn original remake of Shakespeare you prisoners of Shakespeare, and all that.

Singularity of belief is very important so that ideas can rapidly propagate. Once you synchronize a people or a civilization with the same general receptors, say making them flexible to scientific, or political, or religious ideas, then it is just a question of what ideas you put in their neuron pockets. Christians for instance must first believe in the concept of religion in order to conceive and perceive any denomination of Christianity. Faith is not a requirement for a religious believer, religion is, but faith is something within the soul foundation of every idea, if a religious leader has faith, then that faith maybe imparted upon the followers of the belief structure; for instance, it requires a great deal of faith to give birth to any religion or idea, but the followers do not need to possess faith, they need belief. Faith works with unknowns. A scientist must, before accepting any scientific principle, must first have the ability to believe in logic, any inability to perceive logic as an operational tool will be a severe handicap for the advancement of any science, but faith in logic is not a requirement; once the desired belief faith has been born, practitioners are the order of the day. But of course there will still be faith healers, these are the ones that reinvigorate the faith by generating fundamental ideas for the practitioners to worship. A politician too will have to have an fundamental awareness of the general social consciousness, not such thing as a politician that isn’t a populist or isn’t a politician first. The predisposition for an idea is always more important than the idea itself is. All religious leaders would unite if faced with the possible extinction of religion as an idea. What keeps them superficially distinct today is that the mass number of possible believers is a plenty.

Monotheism is born from lack of faith, it requires a substantial amount of desire energy, progenitors of the faith, to give birth to a multiplicity of gods, many heavens, many infernos and many devils. A drop in spiritual hunger unites. Scientist are no different, more than fearing lack of belief in one particular aspect of science, such as relativity or evolution, more they would fear lack of faith in numbers, lack of faith in the rational empirical process, a lack of devotion to statistic and logic; more than anything scientists fear the teaching of religion in a secular structure for god is not objective, god is not logical, god is not sterile, god is not divisible! Fortunately for the scientists the politicians too fear religious teachings, because politicians work to divine secular structures, the division of a people is not allowed in a religious construct, all as one does not allow for one vote, or maybe it allows one vote but no more; if we are all in this together then we are all sinners; politicians like to disassociate themselves from that problem, so they can implore the public will, to grant them the power to fix the problem, the power. The power to resolve the issue, just give them the power, more important, there is no one higher up the chain of command than god, another power monger, so it is of paramount to governmental interest to keep religious faith out of the educational establishment, primarily to resolve hierarchical structural concerns. The fact that religious belief can not be taught, and that a religious soul can not be franchised, has been forgotten by all, even forgotten by the religious gurus and school masters who make a business and a political game out of religion. And my eyes have never witnessed more horror than when I spy scientist or religious practitioners trying to bridge the abyss that exist between the two camps. God is not a scientist! God is not reasonable! And there is no evidence of a god, none! Spirituality has nothing to do with money or politics, or rational, a soul finds god as god finds a soul because of their mutual spirituality, neither really knows the path that leads them to each other, because you don’t need to travel into yourself. But governments and the scientific community fearing the inherent bypass dynamics of spirituality, will proclaim their concerns only effect matters of the earth, the pragmatic here and now. Kindly they don’t care what we do in our next life. The irony here can be easily explained away and made right by their success, people wrongly view success as an affirmation of truth, but if a person is a spiritual being, they are spiritual before they are born, they are spiritual in this here life, and they will be spiritual in the after life, and no one can divide nor promulgate that essence. It is fascinating however, that the most trusted people to lead us into the unknown, and to teach us the unknown are the least open to it, and have the most to lose from it.

And so you might want to know how it is that we got to this junction, well it all has to do with the big bang, or evolution, psychology, or with any other idea, the big bang imposed itself on our frame of mind, and it is very difficult for us to not imagine anything other than a big bang, or an evolution, or a psychological evaluation of self; and this is because the big bang flows with most of our other beliefs, just like democratic peoples flow with singular beliefs; the belief that there is but freedom of choice is a narrow perspective, specially if we should later come to find out that destiny actually makes us all tick like clock work. But freedom of choice does explain away misery nicely. And nothing good can be said of the idea that we are all individuals when our aspirations are so connected to the well being of mass economic structures. All of that is about synchronization, brains that transmits similar energy waves, same ideas, same desires, will feel free within that sameness, and restricted where there is resistance and friction to those lucid brain waves. The success of capitalism and democracy is based on synchronization; those that are of such frame of mind are free within those parameters. You can only be a prisoner where the world is not like you.

What I am saying here is that it is too late for change, fundamental change takes place at the fundamental level of desire which occurs before the expression of the desired condition, that is, you are what you are. Love that or hate that with all your passion; and express as much of that desire as you can possibly accomplish; unexpressed desire reincarnates, do you really want to do this again? No sane person would lunge back into a known expression, reincarnated beings are the sorriest bastards on planet earth. Here there is no way out of yourself, no way out of that irrational logic that you are. Here there is no good reason for your existence, if it had to be justified it could not be, not with a god and not by your feeling especial and unique; but that can not prevent the desire, desire is fundamental to whatever fallacy you chose to believe. And the only way out of your preconceived desire is for you to kill yourself, so that you can end back into the condition of infinite desire again, that is the only option. And when humanity goes on a rampage against itself, murdering itself by the millions, it is reconstructing itself in the only way possible. Murders are the resonance of combined social desires, diffusions of contaminated or restricted expression. If an entity, any entity is restricted from its desire condition, it will destroy itself, it will destroy others, or it will destroy its environment. The stench of the earth is clogged desire. So for safety reasons we should not discourage suicide, after all, it is perfectly fine to die when you are an immortal.

Imagine how difficult humanities task is against the all encompassing nothingness. The task, the impossible task before us is not to adopt ideas as if they were a construct of our character. I am here to tell you that the world of belief is relevant in order to accomplish and peruse any reality, but that it is a deconstruction of self to believe that an idea is the truth, and worst, to believe than an idea is worth killing or dying for. And how can I say that without that idea, the idea of not belonging to any idea, sticking? Some how the paradox resolves itself when you accept it, and that is best, for language and logic create the paradox because of their inherent limitations. If the paradox is merely a semantic and logical error of expression it is absurd to try to solve it, more it is perfectly possible for the paradox, that is two opposing truths, to be equally true. The paradox is merely a manifestation of the inexpressive arrogance of linearity, the universe has many truths that do not agree with one another and they do not know that they do not agree with one another because they don’t use logic; and they don’t use logic because it is not a language that expresses itself within those realms. Humanity subconsciously ignores the paradox as well; anyone trying to solve the paradox is an imbecile, anyone using the inherent contradiction of the paradoxical to win an argument has lost more than the brain they do not posses.

This book is not about oblivion, though oblivion is certainly part of the constant theme, in the sense that I have had to place humanity in contrast with the nothingness so that I can explain how much bigger than us the nothingness is. When it is obvious that a nonentity is larger than a real entity, I hope, that will give you a clue into the non reality of being. There is no way, that which does not exist, which is indeed bigger and more dominant than the something that occupies existence, will accept its destruction kindly, no way, never. To accept its destruction you would need to be able to identify the nothingness, and then bring it to justice, but like all things that are dominant, it is difficult to find guilt within the nothingness, and it is guilt that makes a criminal identifiable. But the nothingness and its indifference are absolutes, you can not find guilt if what you are looking at is the sin itself.

It is, I shall warn you, easier to destroy something who’s position is known and categorized, and whatever of it is not known can be identified easier yet if it insist on definition. By adopting certainty humans expose themselves to the nothingness, the easiest human to destroy or to manipulate is one that follows a pattern, and a human that follows a pattern with the certainty of mathematics and evolution, that is with knowledge, is undoubtedly the most traceable thing in the universe. Further, because such strong convictions will not change easily, that is if faced with an adulterated reality, then the only option upon challenge is annihilation.

You can accept things like religion, capitalism, existentialism, psychology, evolution, mathematics, etc… as tools, not as truth, not as worth defending above all other things, the universe gains against the nothingness by fabricating more things and experiencing more things, not by narrowing realities. The reality of the universe is based on a desire to expand, focus murders the universe, focus murders the universe, murders the universe, murders the universe!

To learn how to think is to learn not to learn. It is foolish to waste energies trying to convince the self that any reality is absolute, or that the self owns any reality, or that it is in anyone’s interest to own reality, everything is useful at some point, at some level, equally it can be destructive, at some point and at some level. The bad side of god is the devil.

The fundamental problem that afflicts humanity today is that it believes in truth, and that it does not possess the truth, so it logically adopts belief as truth; and then it defends it with all prejudice. Of course if there is truth, truth being an absolute, truth being something that can not be destroyed, it requires no defense; all the valiant defenders of the truth can rest assure that the truth is self realizing, it will crash into us, the only thing that defends itself is that which is not sure it is the truth; and there is nothing more absurd, more ridiculous, more comic, than a human being that is owned and operated by a mere idea. Tragedy.

Someday humanity will disengage from the need to believe in truth, or to own ideas as truth, humanity will be able to start from any point, and to end from any point, and to continue from any point. And all of the energies that are subjugated now to the masters and makers of truth, will be released, and humanity will expand wildly through the universe, and kill it even faster.

How can I know that it will all come to pass? If you follow my irrational logic, no books are written that are not already a manifestation of the readers that they will find; the world does not express what it is not ready to hear, there are subconscious leaks everywhere, what is manifesting itself through me, is also manifesting itself through some other, the more sensitive and tuned of us will deliver the message first or best. In summary, I say that desire, intuition, belief, and thought always precede discovery, knowledge and action. And in that order. Further, I will claim that desire, intuition, belief and thought can bypass, and or make irrelevant, discovery, knowledge and action. Conclusively, all action is the abortion of thought! As for me, I am just an hourly employee for the bureaucracy that maintains our infinity, an expression bubbling on the face of humanity.

And now for a bit of bad news: The neutrino does not exist!

I shall pause here, some of you might have some questions.