There has always been the question of how much we can really accomplish as individuals and as a humanity; there seems to never be a clear picture of what humanities incredible potential is. Humanity always seems more capable that it appears, and it operates under the pretence that each and all of its parts are under-performing in relation to an objectified potential.
The universal problem presented by this misconception is that our universe does not conserve. Our universe does not hold back; it does not over exceed either, it performs precisely as would be expected of a universe that has as much inherent energy as ours does, when an accumulation of energy occurs, if it is sufficient it explodes, if it is not it simmers, but it does not hold in reserve secret quantities of potential that are not known to itself. In short the universe does not in any way plan for the future. The future happens this much is true, and it may indeed happen because of some or all of our actions. But these actions are all based on maximums, they happen because they happen not because they can in any way be contrived to produce futures. A universe is in the end nothing but an consciousness that is aware of finality and seeks to reverse it through grandeur.
There are however only, and I must say, fortunately, two real scenarios for the universe to exist in, that is if it is to be assumed real. If the universe is not real there are infinite scenarios that can make unrealities. Impossible things are inherently extremely complicated, this is because they require a perverse and incessant amount of imagination for them to exist. Due to their ephemeral nature, their construct being the most artificial thing in the universe, they thus require infinite amounts of energy and imagination. This is particularly difficult because a thing that is not real can not directly consume externals to use them as nutrition. An unreal thing must first convince an entity that has a consciousness to reproduce it, and, what is for the unreal even more terrible, it can not just reach into the consciousness for expression, rather the consciousness has to discover it, stumble upon it and perhaps find it useful in some way. After an entity decides to propagate an impossible thing then that impossible thing lives on consuming the real universe via that entity. But it is most interesting and fantastic that impossible things exist only as ideas and that the things that they consume and use to propagate themselves are indeed real, while a real entity might be willing to die for an idea an idea would never suffer the consequences. Unreal things we can say are hypothetical parasites. The idea of a magic genie or a god are for instance very difficult to conjure as a reality, however they are both kept alive as an impossible through an infinite reaffirmation of historical imaginations. So these hypothetical parasites are known not so much because as entities we know them but rather because we see the results of their actions. In the end to molest thought so as to answer questions with things that are highly improbable is to place thought in an infinity of potential, not possible but done everyday just to answer questions that may not even have any answers. It is conceivable for instance that the universe never had a beginning and if this is so asking questions of origins is real life malfeasance. This is why our type of universe is favored, direct processes that consume, react and are consumed, it is less impossible to construct, it is more narrow, more knowable, more shall we say directly aware and real.
So our universe, fortunately for us, falls into the category of imaginably real. We can focus and because of that finality of detail we can narrow it down to two possible scenarios. One the universe exist only inside of our individual consciousness and is infinite because we are spherical in character. The fact that we detect a curvature in time and space is merely an acknowledgement of the curvature inherent in our consciousness. Such obligatory individual consciousness even in the singular is universal in scope and infinite within itself; but not really infinite due to its individuality, individual entities do of course have a finality to themselves, thought it may appear infinite to any internal or external individual entities or to a gregarious consciousness. But fortunately for those that don’t want to tolerate absolute egotism, internalized individual universes do not generally have room for anything outside of themselves. It does not even reduce their selfishness any to say that for that matter neither do their more generous counterparts which we shall call gregarious universes because they coexist with other consciousness, but such universes are agglomerations of similarities, hardly all encompassing. So individual universes outside of themselves are impossible, their consciousness does not allow it, there is nothing that can substantiate the possibly different nature of a universe outside of itself; its consciousness only thinks and feels in reference to itself, all things to it will appear or become familiar with proximity, and strangely alien or unknown with any acquisition of distance. But all things in this, and any consciousness in it would be composed of the same elemental particle of ideas, there would and ought to be no reason to suspect that anything truly different and original could or can exist inside of any absolute consciousness, and if something so alien and unique did appear, expect shock and immediate rejection and destruction to occur.
Because of the previously stated impossibility of impossibles, and the necessary familiarity of any conscientious awareness, the universe from any angle is merely a compilation of consciousness, an agreed reality and vision; and yet it has no external capacity to make arrangements with any consciousness that is willing to be fellow cohabitant. This and any universe is in the end impervious to reason, and it is so because the universe is instantaneous and reason requires analysis; the universe and this or any type of universe is most irrational always! This is not a universal option, insignificant systems of consciousness may find rational useful, but to the universe it would be a detriment. So the universe as it exist is an agglomeration of one or many globular structures of irrational consciousness, as linked together because they share the same view of the universe, not because they reason it so, but rather share an inherent view which will, incidentally impose upon them forces and laws, which are not easily appropriated and assimilated as individual creations, or as necessarily beneficial to this or that individual.
The absolute agglomerated consciousness universe, one with many as oppose to the one with one, will still be infinite also because consciousness, like character, its nature is spherical, individual consciousness forms singular multiple sphere, incomplete without the other, more to not know that is, spheres of awareness of consciousness formed as a series of connecting amorphous structures with no absolute definition for size or shape. Consciousness can be great or small; the only genuine rule being that no structure of consciousness is to express geometrical sharpness ever nor at any level. Curvature is thus a fundamental component of the nature of all things. The reason why straight lines are so dutifully avoided its because they would reach an unknown, a straight line can keep going into an unexplored obscurity, a curvature maintains a reference point to itself, curvature allows for one to always reference the self, curved lines can always return to themselves or at least hold that promise if they need to, straight lines do not have this option, linearity has no historical reference, it can not look back on itself; consciousness is not a free floater, it requires reference to self, and even a chained conscious universe, needs to touch other curvatures to maintain an inherent warmth that will perish if all points in space continue to disperse from one another in straight lines. Curvatures in space are then evidence of a universe, or universes that are always willing to return to themselves, a universe or universes that have a sense of history, and universes that are paranoid of wondering beyond their own awareness.
There you have it, all the possible universes reduced to two. One of only one or one of many. This is less preposterous that you might imagine because if the universe exist as we imagine it, it exist as much because of our imagination as that is formulated by our consciousness, which may or may not have an accurate picture of the universe; but more it is that if the universe allows consciousness to arise, it is absurd to imagine that that consciousness would not have something in common with the universe that it inhabits. Things that do not know each other do not know each other and have nothing in common. By virtue of the fact that the universe allows our exploration of it, it tells us that we are a part of it, and as part of the universe highly given to guess its ways correctly, because they are in a sense our ways.
A universe with other conscious entities vs. a universe with only a singular consciousness may appear very different, one a populace of globular consciousness entities joined from spherical hip to spherical hip, and the other a mere singular individual needing no joints; but because they are real possibilities they can replace each other at will, and are indeed more likely to be a reflection of one another than complete unmatchable opposites. One might be as much a refinement of the other in that in one of one entity the subjective self builds itself regardless of the externals and in the one of many entities the same subjective essence is compromised to external relationships so as to accomplish astronomical grandeur. That is all for one idea of consciousness. The reason for this boring bricklayer sameness of a very different construct has already been given, a universe if possible shares infinite similarities with other possible universes because they are all possible; just like impossible universes would have more in common with impossible universes that with real ones.
It is entirely possible then to imagine an evolution that would allow for one singular consciousness universe to evolve into a multiple consciousness universe; or for the reverse of that, a multiple consciousness universe to evolve into a singular consciousness universe; or it is even possible for two same or different universes to collide with minor infractions and evolve as a singular or as a plurality of consciousness.
A universe inhabited by a single consciousness colliding with a universe inhabited with multiple entities of consciousness would be more likely to merge and lose its individual consciousness as it disperses under the combine weight of all of the individual consciousness entities, because they are likely to have greater energies and more variedly define energies than the one energy as represented by a singular consciousness. Varied energies will always represent a greater challenge to singular energies even if they are equals; a singular energy of consciousness will need disproportional amounts of greater consciousness on its side to successfully compete against diverse lower energies. But odds aside It is possible to imagine that if an individual consciousness universe, in colliding with a multiplicity of consciousness universe, if it has a greater definition of self, and if it is more entwined in its idea of self, that it could absorbed and re-channel gregarious consciousness unto its complete self, as itself in part becomes a very gargantuan consciousness. Or if the singular consciousness being massive in self energy may still not overcome the gregarious consciousness yet it could dispersed as self, dispersed within individual conscientious entities, immersed as self locally at the periphery and disappearing towards the center of agglomerated consciousness but yet converting others to itself thought more converted to the ways of the larger gregarious consciousness. It would be partially interpreted as the god thing in that universe because of its configured greatness. But it would not necessarily be known in all parts of that universe, it would have to proliferate from the regions where it collided with the gregarious universe and expand as permitted by the potential energies contained within it, or and with any conscious energies converted in that vicinity. It could then in theory reverse its own demise.
Now remember that the opposing happening is more likely, because again we are dealing with things that are more possibles here, and as you well by now know possibles make for possibles. Suppose that the agglomeration of consciousness universe were more ideally advanced, more aware of its energizing reality, if it were to collide with an individual conciseness universe, it, the individual universe alone would cease to have any real meaning or value to itself. Its identity would be lost in the vast agglomerated consciousness of the greater universe. Such a consciousness might, if possessed of real strength, certainly contrive at least a nova splash entrance into the greater universe, but it would fade and immerse quickly, converting most of its consciousness into the consciousness already in existence in the universal agglomeration; the vestiges of its consciousness time would certainly erase.
It is also possible that a universe with a singular consciousness will brake apart under the weight of its own consciousness and assume an agglomeration of individual consciousness. Consider if you will that the universe is one infinite consciousness and this infinite consciousness begins to acquire confusion, infinity has the ability to violate the laws of universal awareness, that is a thing knows itself and knows itself intuitively even if it refuses to recognize itself; a thing always acts on its own best interest, but in an infinity of self an entity may acquire a confusion of self and not recognize some of its own parts as parts of the self; when this occurs those ignored parts of the self consciousness, will developed a thinning out disparity of consciousness, which will allow for the separation of that part of the consciousness from its greater consciousness, the separation is of course by virtue of association never complete, it therefore maintains a link which will invariably relate to the greater consciousness. But here is the fascinating aspect of this breaking of awareness. The younger consciousness will have a tendency to grow faster that the more mature consciousness, this is due to the principle of inherent identity, a consciousness even if partial inherently understands where it once was as part of the greater consciousness, so its consciousness will expand at a faster dynamic rate to accomplish its understood sense self, as such was formulated by its cosmic memory of attachment; and in so expeditiously doing will, sooner than the large consciousness is older, assume an almost equal role in the new and combined universe of awareness that they form as two of one. The two of one is limitless of course and the split process, once it has been done once roots inevitably and nicely, this is because the hardest part of anything is original inception, replication is easier, which is why inception is so rare, originality is difficult to produce, which makes it more possible to imagine that there was and never will be such a thing. This individual explosion of one consciousness within the consciousness of another can multiply, and so there may indeed be a universe ever growing with parts of individual consciousness that are sort of braking off of it, and serving to make it greater, by expansion but less by separation.
The fact that an individual universe can sort of break apart under its own weight of ignorance leads for a consciousness of expansion that the infinite consciousness sees as a danger to itself because it approaches the possibility of an impossible, the straight line problem. The more you split a consciousness and the more that consciousness grows, the less the curvature, the more that expansion will seem further out into the infinity of things, which with growth becomes more and more distant by cause of separation; and it is this very process that causes the consciousness to want to bring all of its dissenting parts back together into a single universe. This being the case the singular consciousness will seek to implode, to collapse upon itself so as to bring all of its parts back into a universal singularity of absolute possession of self. Unfortunately for the mass consciousness its parts being more distant from its conscious center perceive this implosion of self as a negative, why it is a cavernous death for them which thought part of the same have some what acquire an independence. So as much as the great attractor wants to bring them together, they will insist in maintaining a separation, and that separation will be completely dependent on how fast they have matured to equal the consciousness that is now seeking to arrest them back into itself.
If each individual consciousness has the potential to reach the actual consciousness of the greater consciousness because as one part of it they have a complete ingrained history map of it; this is again why they grow dynamically faster because they are not initially learning themselves, they are merely reproducing themselves, only their adventurous reproduction is taking place in another dimension and or point of space and time, and so two things can happen that will determine their independence from the parent.
In scenario one the different time, space dimensions inhabited by the developing consciousness may foster a more beneficial growth or a more diverse growth in which case the larger consciousness will have a more difficult time re-channeling that consciousness back into itself. More accelerated growth will equal more distance, more distance means that the greater consciousness will have a more difficult time reaching all of its parts. More distance and growth can also mean that the consciousness can acquire an inequality of consciousness or even a more massive consciousness, in which case who pulls who together begins to be a problem for the older consciousness.
A new and greater one than the older consciousness will have a very difficult time bringing that consciousness together into itself, because of their difference they will not chain as well, so the more different the greater new consciousness is from the older consciousness, the more likely that they are to cohabitate in each others vicinities without one imploding into the other; that is without swallowing each other. But suppose that the space time and dimensional circumstance is the same? If so then the new and greater personality of consciousness will surely swallow the other because compatibility assimilates, and it this way it increases itself, eats its parent, and it increases the curvature, by length, of its universe; which is to say that it avoids the straight line problem. A singularity in space is simply the most curved onto itself thing in the universe.
As these consciousness approach each other they of course what to prevent their arrival into each other because this is a problem for their individuality of consciousness and so they always try to go around each other, in the blind hope that they will have time to acquire more greater consciousness so as to be the arresting force rather than the arrested force. This process is the impediment, that forces everything in the universe to approach each other in a curved path. Conflict avoidance is fundamental to the maintenance of any consciousness.
But conflict avoidance has its limitations, as a consciousness acquires greater consciousness it wants to become one with everything and so it seeks to channels everything into itself, it seeks conformity, it wants to embodied everything, and to be everything and to equal any and all sums. This massive consensus of consciousness either isolated or in the aggregate will try to string-out all orbits so that they center immediately upon itself.
And it is the imposition of self, the imposition of everything that I am that really creates the potential energy in the universe, and the potential energy in the universe is always max out, a thing of consciousness, or a thing of matter, which are by the way the same, can never operate at 90 percent or at 110 percent; a thing is always operating with, 100 percent, all energy values that are possible to its consciousness. And this is because it takes a lot of energy to keep distance in space, and it takes much more energy to acquire other things from space, and it requires infinite energy to maintain consciousness so consciousness thus operates at maximum potential at all times.
At a more terminal level there is no room for you to exceed yourself, dissatisfaction is only possible when you imagine the things that you can not do, because if you are satisfied with what your consciousness can do, then you are satisfied with who you are. The untapped potential that you may think your consciousness possesses is non existence. When a body has a lot of energy it explodes, and then it simmers, both are aspects of the same thing, energy used and energy dissipation based on immediate ability. The universal and the individual conscious is max out.
So the universe has a fantastic idea about potential, but it is mostly impossible because the universe is already operating at its own full potential which again maybe a condition of apparent inflammation, or a simmering condition which may appear as a contraction but it is not; rather it is an expansion which disperses; all dispersing expansions appear as contractions because the consciousness reads itself as disappearing. A false impression but in the case of that particular dispersing consciousness some what terribly valid.
Following this very perverse logic you must wonder why everything would need to assume such an absolutist potential performance option, a valid concern. The reason of this unreasonable unexploded potential impossibility is burdened upon you and all consciousness by infinity. The crux is that if our universe, and even every other universe, out there turns out to be finite, infinity will not. There is no other side to infinity and the reason why there is no other side for infinity is because while our consciousness exist only under containment, that containment is impossible for infinity. The fact then, that regardless of all things finite, there is an underlying infinity that can not be perceived by an expanding consciousness, an attempt at perception is declared by its very expansion, but regardless, that infinity has inherent indifference to that understanding; a difference caused because everything happens within infinity, infinity can not expand, all expansion takes place within infinity. More important any detection of movement, or of progress is evidence of the finality inherent within a thing; but infinity which is equal to nothingness does not suffer geometry, it does not have a center, or an edge, perplexingly however, all of its parts are equal which makes it perversely powerful even as all the nothingness that it is. Infinity is in all points of space at once, but it may not be any larger than a neutrino which appears to travel fast not so much because of velocity but rather because like infinity, it is in so many places at once.
You as you exist today can not know infinity, and if you were to become a part of the infinity you would not know it, infinity does not need to be aware of itself because it is at the top of the food chain, it consumes all things that are finite and that have an edge, and never changes in the process. Infinity consumes but this does not mean that it matures or expands, infinity can not be any larger because it is already infinite, infinity does not have dynamic, nor can infinity be measured in volume because infinity does not, unlike your consciousness, acknowledge time. This is why ever expanding into the infinity, consciousness and universes are forever extending themselves to their maximum potential, reaching more for their finality than their suppose mass agglomeration; infinity dictates simmering because it is under you feet, it dictates a finality for all things that are struggling energy. To consume nothingness is impossible for things that exist while nothingness can and does consume existence; to consume and inhabit infinity is insanely impossible for a finality; your mortality is born out of an infinity, the fundamental anguish that awaits any consciousness is its relational finality, as it will be imposed by its subsiding struggle against nothingness simply because it can not understand finality within infinity. Fundamentally life and consciousness do not make munch sense, and both life and consciousness are the same things, same things that are discovered by each other, when things are closest to their finality, in the face of a true infinity.
