In a complex world where everyone wants to comprehend everything nothing is a larger problem than the desire to satisfy that desire of understanding. We live in the age of explanation. And while the world at large wants to know at the same time the world wishes not to know, it has to claim a sort of ignorance about how things really work; and the world at large claims this ignorance because it really can not do anything to correct itself, the world at large knows that it is pointless to tune to something that is irrelevant. It is the infernal paradox that is true here, we can and can not trust the instructional knowledge of our humanity.
The reality that while we live in a condition of denial we also live in a condition of awareness of all things is a contradiction of sorts, thought not directly, because a pure contradiction would be to say that we are truly ignorant and truly knowledgeable, we can not say that, rather we can say we are truly aware and we truly chose not to know many things, particularly because we know better, and it is not really because we know better but rather because we are aware, and that awareness is protecting us from the burdens unnecessary knowledge can impose upon us.
Knowledge for instance imposes upon us the burden for action, knowledge produces a degree of dissatisfaction, in particular because it creates the idea that, that which can be known can be changed; and yet the reality is that nothing can be changed, you have to work with everything as it is, because the truth is that the manifestation of any entity, by the time it pricks at you to make you aware of its presence, it’s so defined that to change it is mostly impossible, it is very hard to change anything that imposes itself upon other entities, because the imposition can only take place after the entity imposing it, is so full of its desired existence that it will never be in its benefit to change. You for instance are energy, try and change that in this desire universe of pure energy, annihilation.
Can you change the fact that the environment is being destroyed by your humanities expanding of existence? Of course not, the expansion of humanity is paramount to its idea of self, it is because sewer energy has fallen in love with its essence that it will proceed to promulgate its essence into everything, so it is that the condition of simmering is inevitable for our universe. In order for humanity to exist energy flows must cool, humanities expansion does not just take place at the expense of the earth but also at the expense of the entire universe.
And all this is true because the goal of everything is really to be everything, humanity, in its search for extraterrestrial life, is not really interested in finding aliens that are fundamentally different from itself, rather it is searching for more of itself, other humanities that might have risen in other similar environments in the universe, ask a scientist what the probability for life is in the universe, and that scientist will surely perform a calculation based on how many possible earth like habitats there are. Humanity wants to link to itself, the goal is to find other humanities and, I would be willing to bet your life, that if there are other humanities out there, that they too are vigorously searching for us, and with so much determination that with good fortune we are on a head on collision course with them. Things that are alike attract each other, humanity is destine to find aliens just like itself.
Should humanity in its search for its same other stumble upon some very different alien life then you can expect that there will be a universal war to vanquished that life form, because that life form is a direct rival to our type of simmering energy, any life that exist within the borders of energy that is not identical to ours is a threat to the condition of simmering based on humanities terms and composition. In other words humanity will fight to be the worms that feast on the corpse of the universe!
It is the awareness that only sameness will help us to conquer the universe that ultimately tunes us to equality of belief, a sameness of mind, democracy is not so much a manifestation of an individual mental evolution but rather it is the synchronizing force that induces humanity to breath and chain the same ideas so as to be powerful. Democratic and capitalistic countries are not likely to fight against one another because they are so much the same sin, and you can’t find guilt within the sin itself. Democratic and capitalistic countries commit crimes that are not registered as crimes. Things that are alike unite to become larger and greater because they can not find fault because of their communality, things that are fundamentally different can be immediately identified as criminal and so different ideas and philosophies, such as communism vs. capitalism, seek to destroy each other. Evil is what is not like us. Judeo-Christianity fought to destroy all other gods that were not made in its own image by incorporating evil into its cosmology; no escape, you are the child of their god, if you reject him, you are evil in the Judeo-Christian hell. Incorporating a sameness of humanity into philosophy fills the void of ideas: Evolution: Big Bang: Psychology: Plate Tectonics: Relativity: Quantum: Democracy: Capitalism: Judeo-Christianity/Islam/Buddhism: Shakespeare, just give me one more damn original remake of Shakespeare you prisoners of Shakespeare, and all that.
Singularity of belief is very important so that ideas can rapidly propagate. Once you synchronize a people or a civilization with the same general receptors, say making them flexible to scientific, or political, or religious ideas, then it is just a question of what ideas you put in their neuron pockets. Christians for instance must first believe in the concept of religion in order to conceive and perceive any denomination of Christianity. Faith is not a requirement for a religious believer, religion is, but faith is something within the soul foundation of every idea, if a religious leader has faith, then that faith maybe imparted upon the followers of the belief structure; for instance, it requires a great deal of faith to give birth to any religion or idea, but the followers do not need to possess faith, they need belief. Faith works with unknowns. A scientist must, before accepting any scientific principle, must first have the ability to believe in logic, any inability to perceive logic as an operational tool will be a severe handicap for the advancement of any science, but faith in logic is not a requirement; once the desired belief faith has been born, practitioners are the order of the day. But of course there will still be faith healers, these are the ones that reinvigorate the faith by generating fundamental ideas for the practitioners to worship. A politician too will have to have an fundamental awareness of the general social consciousness, not such thing as a politician that isn’t a populist or isn’t a politician first. The predisposition for an idea is always more important than the idea itself is. All religious leaders would unite if faced with the possible extinction of religion as an idea. What keeps them superficially distinct today is that the mass number of possible believers is a plenty.
Monotheism is born from lack of faith, it requires a substantial amount of desire energy, progenitors of the faith, to give birth to a multiplicity of gods, many heavens, many infernos and many devils. A drop in spiritual hunger unites. Scientist are no different, more than fearing lack of belief in one particular aspect of science, such as relativity or evolution, more they would fear lack of faith in numbers, lack of faith in the rational empirical process, a lack of devotion to statistic and logic; more than anything scientists fear the teaching of religion in a secular structure for god is not objective, god is not logical, god is not sterile, god is not divisible! Fortunately for the scientists the politicians too fear religious teachings, because politicians work to divine secular structures, the division of a people is not allowed in a religious construct, all as one does not allow for one vote, or maybe it allows one vote but no more; if we are all in this together then we are all sinners; politicians like to disassociate themselves from that problem, so they can implore the public will, to grant them the power to fix the problem, the power. The power to resolve the issue, just give them the power, more important, there is no one higher up the chain of command than god, another power monger, so it is of paramount to governmental interest to keep religious faith out of the educational establishment, primarily to resolve hierarchical structural concerns. The fact that religious belief can not be taught, and that a religious soul can not be franchised, has been forgotten by all, even forgotten by the religious gurus and school masters who make a business and a political game out of religion. And my eyes have never witnessed more horror than when I spy scientist or religious practitioners trying to bridge the abyss that exist between the two camps. God is not a scientist! God is not reasonable! And there is no evidence of a god, none! Spirituality has nothing to do with money or politics, or rational, a soul finds god as god finds a soul because of their mutual spirituality, neither really knows the path that leads them to each other, because you don’t need to travel into yourself. But governments and the scientific community fearing the inherent bypass dynamics of spirituality, will proclaim their concerns only effect matters of the earth, the pragmatic here and now. Kindly they don’t care what we do in our next life. The irony here can be easily explained away and made right by their success, people wrongly view success as an affirmation of truth, but if a person is a spiritual being, they are spiritual before they are born, they are spiritual in this here life, and they will be spiritual in the after life, and no one can divide nor promulgate that essence. It is fascinating however, that the most trusted people to lead us into the unknown, and to teach us the unknown are the least open to it, and have the most to lose from it.
And so you might want to know how it is that we got to this junction, well it all has to do with the big bang, or evolution, psychology, or with any other idea, the big bang imposed itself on our frame of mind, and it is very difficult for us to not imagine anything other than a big bang, or an evolution, or a psychological evaluation of self; and this is because the big bang flows with most of our other beliefs, just like democratic peoples flow with singular beliefs; the belief that there is but freedom of choice is a narrow perspective, specially if we should later come to find out that destiny actually makes us all tick like clock work. But freedom of choice does explain away misery nicely. And nothing good can be said of the idea that we are all individuals when our aspirations are so connected to the well being of mass economic structures. All of that is about synchronization, brains that transmits similar energy waves, same ideas, same desires, will feel free within that sameness, and restricted where there is resistance and friction to those lucid brain waves. The success of capitalism and democracy is based on synchronization; those that are of such frame of mind are free within those parameters. You can only be a prisoner where the world is not like you.
What I am saying here is that it is too late for change, fundamental change takes place at the fundamental level of desire which occurs before the expression of the desired condition, that is, you are what you are. Love that or hate that with all your passion; and express as much of that desire as you can possibly accomplish; unexpressed desire reincarnates, do you really want to do this again? No sane person would lunge back into a known expression, reincarnated beings are the sorriest bastards on planet earth. Here there is no way out of yourself, no way out of that irrational logic that you are. Here there is no good reason for your existence, if it had to be justified it could not be, not with a god and not by your feeling especial and unique; but that can not prevent the desire, desire is fundamental to whatever fallacy you chose to believe. And the only way out of your preconceived desire is for you to kill yourself, so that you can end back into the condition of infinite desire again, that is the only option. And when humanity goes on a rampage against itself, murdering itself by the millions, it is reconstructing itself in the only way possible. Murders are the resonance of combined social desires, diffusions of contaminated or restricted expression. If an entity, any entity is restricted from its desire condition, it will destroy itself, it will destroy others, or it will destroy its environment. The stench of the earth is clogged desire. So for safety reasons we should not discourage suicide, after all, it is perfectly fine to die when you are an immortal.
Imagine how difficult humanities task is against the all encompassing nothingness. The task, the impossible task before us is not to adopt ideas as if they were a construct of our character. I am here to tell you that the world of belief is relevant in order to accomplish and peruse any reality, but that it is a deconstruction of self to believe that an idea is the truth, and worst, to believe than an idea is worth killing or dying for. And how can I say that without that idea, the idea of not belonging to any idea, sticking? Some how the paradox resolves itself when you accept it, and that is best, for language and logic create the paradox because of their inherent limitations. If the paradox is merely a semantic and logical error of expression it is absurd to try to solve it, more it is perfectly possible for the paradox, that is two opposing truths, to be equally true. The paradox is merely a manifestation of the inexpressive arrogance of linearity, the universe has many truths that do not agree with one another and they do not know that they do not agree with one another because they don’t use logic; and they don’t use logic because it is not a language that expresses itself within those realms. Humanity subconsciously ignores the paradox as well; anyone trying to solve the paradox is an imbecile, anyone using the inherent contradiction of the paradoxical to win an argument has lost more than the brain they do not posses.
This book is not about oblivion, though oblivion is certainly part of the constant theme, in the sense that I have had to place humanity in contrast with the nothingness so that I can explain how much bigger than us the nothingness is. When it is obvious that a nonentity is larger than a real entity, I hope, that will give you a clue into the non reality of being. There is no way, that which does not exist, which is indeed bigger and more dominant than the something that occupies existence, will accept its destruction kindly, no way, never. To accept its destruction you would need to be able to identify the nothingness, and then bring it to justice, but like all things that are dominant, it is difficult to find guilt within the nothingness, and it is guilt that makes a criminal identifiable. But the nothingness and its indifference are absolutes, you can not find guilt if what you are looking at is the sin itself.
It is, I shall warn you, easier to destroy something who’s position is known and categorized, and whatever of it is not known can be identified easier yet if it insist on definition. By adopting certainty humans expose themselves to the nothingness, the easiest human to destroy or to manipulate is one that follows a pattern, and a human that follows a pattern with the certainty of mathematics and evolution, that is with knowledge, is undoubtedly the most traceable thing in the universe. Further, because such strong convictions will not change easily, that is if faced with an adulterated reality, then the only option upon challenge is annihilation.
You can accept things like religion, capitalism, existentialism, psychology, evolution, mathematics, etc… as tools, not as truth, not as worth defending above all other things, the universe gains against the nothingness by fabricating more things and experiencing more things, not by narrowing realities. The reality of the universe is based on a desire to expand, focus murders the universe, focus murders the universe, murders the universe, murders the universe!
To learn how to think is to learn not to learn. It is foolish to waste energies trying to convince the self that any reality is absolute, or that the self owns any reality, or that it is in anyone’s interest to own reality, everything is useful at some point, at some level, equally it can be destructive, at some point and at some level. The bad side of god is the devil.
The fundamental problem that afflicts humanity today is that it believes in truth, and that it does not possess the truth, so it logically adopts belief as truth; and then it defends it with all prejudice. Of course if there is truth, truth being an absolute, truth being something that can not be destroyed, it requires no defense; all the valiant defenders of the truth can rest assure that the truth is self realizing, it will crash into us, the only thing that defends itself is that which is not sure it is the truth; and there is nothing more absurd, more ridiculous, more comic, than a human being that is owned and operated by a mere idea. Tragedy.
Someday humanity will disengage from the need to believe in truth, or to own ideas as truth, humanity will be able to start from any point, and to end from any point, and to continue from any point. And all of the energies that are subjugated now to the masters and makers of truth, will be released, and humanity will expand wildly through the universe, and kill it even faster.
How can I know that it will all come to pass? If you follow my irrational logic, no books are written that are not already a manifestation of the readers that they will find; the world does not express what it is not ready to hear, there are subconscious leaks everywhere, what is manifesting itself through me, is also manifesting itself through some other, the more sensitive and tuned of us will deliver the message first or best. In summary, I say that desire, intuition, belief, and thought always precede discovery, knowledge and action. And in that order. Further, I will claim that desire, intuition, belief and thought can bypass, and or make irrelevant, discovery, knowledge and action. Conclusively, all action is the abortion of thought! As for me, I am just an hourly employee for the bureaucracy that maintains our infinity, an expression bubbling on the face of humanity.
And now for a bit of bad news: The neutrino does not exist!
I shall pause here, some of you might have some questions.
